Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating the user into research on engineering design systems

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineering design research has historically been evaluated in terms of its computational performance. However, in many cases this research implies hypotheses about human behavior which are ignored. In this paper, we argue that the systems emerging from design research will benefit from investigating how people use them to accomplish work, and from the incorporation of principles of Participatory Design (Floyed et al., 1989) at the earliest stages of the development process. Using a case study, we present the evolution of a CAD system that supports complex mathematical modeling. This design effort is examined according to principles outlined in another well-documented effort in Participatory Design. Finally, despite the common misconception that such considerations impede basic research, we argue that continuous user involvement can guide research by validating experimental hypotheses and pointing to areas for future inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., and Kyng, M.Computers and Democracy-A Scandinavian Challenge. Aldershot, England: Avebury, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, J. and Henderson, A. Reflections on Participatory Design: Lessons from the Trillium Experience.CHI '90 Conference Proceedings: Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seattle, WA: ACM P, 353–360, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Krasner, H., and Iscoe, N. A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems.Communications of the ACM 31:11, 1268–1287, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, V. and Ranganathan, N. Integer Programming versus Expert Systems. An Experimental Comparison.Communications of the ACM 33(3), 326–336, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Andrade, R. Memory and assessment in behavior.Measurement in the Social Sciences Blalock, H.M. (Ed.), Aldine Publishing Company: Chicago, 159–186, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, C. Outline of a Paradigm Change in Software Engineering.Computers and Democracy—A Scandinavian Challenge. G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (Eds.). Aldershot, England: Avebury, 191–210, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, C., Mehl, W-M., Reisin, F-M., Schmidt, G., and Wolf, G. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development.Human-Computer Interaction 4, 253–350, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P.K., Lavoie, R.C., and Radcliffe, R.R. An Industry Evaluation of SPEEDUP.Paper Presented at the AIChE Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, 1984.

  • Hayes, John R.The Complete Problem Solver. Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, BrigitteBirth in Four Cultures. Montreal: Eden Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, D. and Meeraus, A. GAMS, an Introductory Technical Report.Technical Report, Development and Research Department at the World Bank. Washington, DC, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W.J.Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York: Methuen, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penzias, A.Ideas and Information: Managing in a High-Tech World. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J.D. Equation-Oriented Flowsheeting. In A.W. Westerberg and H.H. Chien (Eds.),Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Foundations of Computer-aided Process Design. 309–367. United States: CACHE Publications, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piela, P., Epperly, T., Westerberg, K. and Westerberg, A. ASCEND: An Object-Oriented Computer Environment for Modeling and Analysis. Part 1—The Modeling Language.Computers and Chemical Engineering 15 (1), 53–72, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbrock, H. The Background to the Project.Designing Human-Centered Technology: A Cross-Disciplinary Project in Computer-Aided Manufacturing. London: Springer-Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shacham, M., Macchietto, S., Stutzman, L.F., and Babcock, P. REVIEW—Equation-Oriented Approach to Process Flowsheeting.Computers and Chemical Engineering 6, (2), 79–95, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford University, Department of Operations Research, Systems Optimization Laboratory MINOS system manual. (Technical Report Collection, SUORSOL-7731), Stanford California, 1977.

  • Suchman, L.A.Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoresen, K. Experiences with Participatory Design.PDC'90: Participatory Design Conference Proceedings. A. Namioka and D. Schuler (Eds.), Scattle, WA: 34–35, 1990.

  • Westerberg, A. ASCEND: A System for the Rapid Building of Equational Models.CIT, The Magazine of the Carnegie Institute of Technology 9 (2), 23–26, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg, A.W. and Benjamin, D.R. Thoughts on a Future Equation-Oriented Flowsheeting System.Computers and Chemical Engineering 9 (5), 517–526, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg, A.W., Hutchinson, H.P., Motard, R.L., and Winter, P.Process Flowsheeting. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, F.Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piela, P., Katzenberg, B. & McKelvey, R. Integrating the user into research on engineering design systems. Research in Engineering Design 3, 211–221 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580843

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580843

Keywords

Navigation