This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Tallent, N., and Reiss, W. J.: Multidisciplinary views on the preparation of written clinical psychological reports. II. Acceptability of certain common variables. J. Clin. Psychol., 15: 273–274, 1959.
—: Multidisciplinary views on the preparation of written clinical psychological reports. III. The trouble with psychological reports. J. Clin. Psychol., 15: 444–446, 1959.
—: Multidisciplinary views on the preparation of written clinical psychological reports: I. Spontaneous suggestions for content. J. Clin. Psychol., 15: 218–221, 1959.
Dailey, C. A.: The practical utility of the clinical report. J. Consult. Psychol., 17: 297–302, 1953.
Meehl, P. E.: Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: a Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis. 1954.
Sarbin, T. R.; Taft, R., and Bailey, D. E.: Clinical Inference and Cognitive Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York. 1960.
Tallent, N.: Clinical Psychological Consultation: a Rationale and Guide to Team Practice. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1963.
Holt, R. R.: Clinical and statistical prediction: a reformulation and some new data. J. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 56: 1–12, 1958.
Hammond, K. R., and Allen, J. M.: Writing Clinical Reports. Prentice-Hall. New York. 1953.
Klopfer, W. G.: The Psychological Report. Grune & Stratton. New York. 1962.
Mayer-Gross, W.; Slater, E.; and Roth, M.: Clinical Psychiatry. 2d edition. Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore. 1960.
Grayson, H. M., and Tolman, Ruth S.: A semantic study of concepts of clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. J. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 45: 216–231, 1950.
Johnson, W.: The degree of extensional agreement among twenty psychologists in their use of the labels “hypothesis,” “theory,” and “law”. Iowa Academy of Science, 52: 255–259, 1945.
Tallent, N.: On individualizing the psychologist's clinical evaluation. J. Clin. Psychol., 14: 243–244, 1958.
Davenport, Beverly F.: The semantic validity of TAT interpretation. J. Consult. Psychol., 16: 171–175, 1952.
Balint, M.: The Doctor, the Patient and the Illness. International Universities Press. New York. 1957.
Ruch, F. L.: Psychology and Life. New edition. Scott, Foresman. New York. 1941.
English, H. B., and English, Ava C.: A Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Psychoanalytical Terms. Longmans, Green. New York. 1958.
Ebel, R. L.: Must all tests be valid. Am. Psychologist, 16: 640–647, 1961.
Ebel, R. L.: Technical Recommendations for Psychological Tests and Diagnostic Techniques. American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C. 1954.
Ebel, R. L.: Technical Recommendations for Achievement Tests. American Educational Research Association, Committee on Test Standards. Washington, D.C. 1955.
Tallent, N.: Manifest content and interpretive meaning of verbal intelligence test responses. J. Clin. Psychol., 14: 57–58, 1958.
Webster's New International Dictionary, 2d edition, unabridged. G. & C. Merriam. Springfield, Mass. 1959.
Glover, F.: The therapeutic effect of inexact interpretation: a contribution to the theory of suggestion. Int. J. Psychoan., 12: 397, 1931.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
From the Veterans Administration Hospital, Northampton, Mass.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tallent, N. The psychiatric utility of clinical records. Psych Quar 37, 642–665 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01566434
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01566434