Abstract
Profile analysis can be used in sex research as a statistical procedure to assess the degree of similarity between various samples on different parameters of sexual behavior. Data are presented to analyze intergenerational changes comparing three independent samples including a time interval of approximately four decades. Profile analysis can differentiate the intergenerational trend. Results show (i) a clear trend of male-female profile-convergence over time; (ii) intergenerational changes in males are few with male sexual behavior seemingly little influenced by social changes; (iii) females show large intergenerational differences. These asymmetric trends demonstrate that the sexual changes within the last four decades are a one-sided process of females liberating from the “behavioral double standard.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asayama, S. (1976). Sexual behavior in Japanese students: Comparisons for 1974, 1960, and 1952.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 371–390.
Barrett, F. M. (1980). Sexual experience, birth control usage, and sex education of unmarried Canadian university students: Changes between 1968 and 1978.Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 367–390.
Bell, R. R., and Chaskes, J. B. (1970). Premarital sexual experience among coeds, 1958 and 1968.J. Marr. Fam. 32: 81–84.
Bell, R. R., and Coughey, K. (1980). Premarital sexual experience among college females 1958, 1968, and 1978.Fam. Rel. 29: 353–357.
Cattell, R. B. (1949).r p and other coefficients of pattern similarity.Psychometrika 14: 279–298.
Clement, U., Schmidt, G., and Kruse, M. (1984). Changes in sex differences in sexual behavior: A replication of a study of West German students (1966–1981).Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 99–120.
Clement, U. (1986).Sexualität im sozialen Wandel Enke, Stuttgart.
Croake, J. W., and James, B. E. (1973). A four year comparison of premarital sexual attitudes.J. Sex Res. 9: 91–96.
Downey, L. (1980). Intergenerational change in sex behavior: A belated look at Kinsey's males.Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 267–317.
Ferrell, M. Z., Tolone, W. L., and Walsh, R. H. (1977). Maturational and societal changes in the sexual double-standard: A panel analysis (1967–1971; 1970–1974).J. Marr. Fam. 29: 255–271.
Fleiss, J. L., and Zubin, J. (1968). On the methods and theory of clustering.Multiv. Behav. Res. 4: 235–250.
Giese, H., and Schmidt, G. (1968).Studentensexualität Rowohlt, Hamburg.
Glenn, N. D., and Weaver, C. N. (1979). Attitudes toward premartial, extramarital, and homosexual relations in the U.S. in the 1970's.J. Sex Res. 15: 108–118.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Mahoney, E. R. (1978). Age differences in attitude change toward premarital coitus.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 493–501.
Raboch, J., and Barták, V. (1980). Changes in the sexual life of Czechoslovak women born between 1911 and 1958.Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 495–502.
Schlosser, O. (1976).Einführung in die Sozialwissenschaftliche Zusammenhangsanalyse, Reinbek.
Schmidt, G., and Sigusch, V. (1972). Changes in sexual behavior among young males and females between 1960 and 1970.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2: 27–45.
Sherwin, R., and Corbett, S. (1985). Campus sexual norms and dating relationships: A trend analysis.J. Sex. Res. 21: 258–274.
Sigusch, V., and Schmidt, G. (1973).Jugendsexualität, Stuttgart.
Tolone, W. L., Ferrell, M. Z., and Walsch, R. H. (1975).Attitudinal and behavioral bases of the sexual double-standard. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clement, U. Profile analysis as a method of comparing intergenerational differences in sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 18, 229–237 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543197
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543197