Skip to main content
Log in

Profile analysis as a method of comparing intergenerational differences in sexual behavior

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Profile analysis can be used in sex research as a statistical procedure to assess the degree of similarity between various samples on different parameters of sexual behavior. Data are presented to analyze intergenerational changes comparing three independent samples including a time interval of approximately four decades. Profile analysis can differentiate the intergenerational trend. Results show (i) a clear trend of male-female profile-convergence over time; (ii) intergenerational changes in males are few with male sexual behavior seemingly little influenced by social changes; (iii) females show large intergenerational differences. These asymmetric trends demonstrate that the sexual changes within the last four decades are a one-sided process of females liberating from the “behavioral double standard.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asayama, S. (1976). Sexual behavior in Japanese students: Comparisons for 1974, 1960, and 1952.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 371–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, F. M. (1980). Sexual experience, birth control usage, and sex education of unmarried Canadian university students: Changes between 1968 and 1978.Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 367–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. R., and Chaskes, J. B. (1970). Premarital sexual experience among coeds, 1958 and 1968.J. Marr. Fam. 32: 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. R., and Coughey, K. (1980). Premarital sexual experience among college females 1958, 1968, and 1978.Fam. Rel. 29: 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1949).r p and other coefficients of pattern similarity.Psychometrika 14: 279–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, U., Schmidt, G., and Kruse, M. (1984). Changes in sex differences in sexual behavior: A replication of a study of West German students (1966–1981).Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 99–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, U. (1986).Sexualität im sozialen Wandel Enke, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croake, J. W., and James, B. E. (1973). A four year comparison of premarital sexual attitudes.J. Sex Res. 9: 91–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L. (1980). Intergenerational change in sex behavior: A belated look at Kinsey's males.Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 267–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, M. Z., Tolone, W. L., and Walsh, R. H. (1977). Maturational and societal changes in the sexual double-standard: A panel analysis (1967–1971; 1970–1974).J. Marr. Fam. 29: 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L., and Zubin, J. (1968). On the methods and theory of clustering.Multiv. Behav. Res. 4: 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giese, H., and Schmidt, G. (1968).Studentensexualität Rowohlt, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N. D., and Weaver, C. N. (1979). Attitudes toward premartial, extramarital, and homosexual relations in the U.S. in the 1970's.J. Sex Res. 15: 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, E. R. (1978). Age differences in attitude change toward premarital coitus.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 493–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raboch, J., and Barták, V. (1980). Changes in the sexual life of Czechoslovak women born between 1911 and 1958.Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 495–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, O. (1976).Einführung in die Sozialwissenschaftliche Zusammenhangsanalyse, Reinbek.

  • Schmidt, G., and Sigusch, V. (1972). Changes in sexual behavior among young males and females between 1960 and 1970.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2: 27–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, R., and Corbett, S. (1985). Campus sexual norms and dating relationships: A trend analysis.J. Sex. Res. 21: 258–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V., and Schmidt, G. (1973).Jugendsexualität, Stuttgart.

  • Tolone, W. L., Ferrell, M. Z., and Walsch, R. H. (1975).Attitudinal and behavioral bases of the sexual double-standard. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Chicago.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clement, U. Profile analysis as a method of comparing intergenerational differences in sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 18, 229–237 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543197

Key words

Navigation