Skip to main content
Log in

Metastatic properties of distinct phenotypic classes of lectin-resistant mutants isolated from murine MDAY-D2 cell line

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Single-step mutants were isolated from the murine metastatic MDAY-D2 cell line after selection in toxic concentrations of wheat-germ agglutinin. They were partially characterized by measuring their relative level of resistance to WGA, PHA, Con A, RIC, and LCA (Lec phenotype), and by comparing their karyotype and their ability to produce metastases upon transplantation into syngeneic DBA/2 mice. Based on their Lec phenotype, a total of 19 independent isolates were ranked into 10 distinct classes. Among them, two EMS-induced mutants were nontumorigenic (Lec II, Lec III), one nonmetastatic (Lec IV), and one spontaneous mutant (Lec I) failed to produce blood-borne metastases. Other spontaneous mutants belonging to Lec I, Lec II, and other classes were as metastatic as their parents. The Lec IV phenotype was found to segregate independently from metastatic potential in somatic hybrids. Metastatic ability was recovered in mutants expressing the Lec IV phenotype, after further selection for resistance to RIC. Our results strongly suggest that the loss or reduction of the invasive property of tumor cells is associated with only few Lecr phenotypes and, therefore, that a restricted number of cell surface glyconjugates are essential for this particular function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Briles, E.G. (1982).Int. Rev. Cytol. 75:101–165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stanley, P. (1980). InBiochemistry of Proteoglycans and Glycoproteins, (ed.) Lennarz, W.J. (Plenum Publishing, New York), pp. 161–189.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Montreuil, J. (1980).Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 37:157–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stanley, P., Caillibot, V., and Siminovitch, L. (1974).Cell 6:121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stanley, P., Caillibot, V., and Siminovitch, L. (1975).Somat. Cell Genet. 1:3–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stanley, P., Sudo, T., and Carver, J.P. (1980).J. Cell Biol. 85:60–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanley, P. (1981).Mol. Cell. Biol. 1:687–696.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanley, P. (1983).Somat. Cell Genet. 9:593–608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerbel, R.S., Dennis, J.W., Largarde, A.E., and Frost, P. (1982).Cancer Metast. Rev. 1:99–140.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tao, T.W., and Burger, M.M. (1977).Nature 270:437–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tao, T.W., and Burger, M.M. (1982).Int. J. Cancer 29:425–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Finne, J., Burger, M.M., and Prieels, J.P. (1982).J. Cell Biol. 92:277–282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Finne, J., Tao, T.W., and Burger, M.M. (1980).Cancer Res. 40:2580–2587.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerbel, R.S. (1979).Am. J. Pathol. 97:609–622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dennis, J., Donaghue, T., Florian, M., and Kerbel, R.S. (1981).Nature 292:242–245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lagarde, A.E., Donaghue, T.P., Dennis, J.W., and Kerbel, R.S. (1983).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 71:183–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dennis, J.W., Waller, C., Timple, R., and Schirrmacher, V. (1982).Nature 300:274–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dennis, J., Carver, J., and Schachter, H. (1984).J. Cell Biol. (in press).

  19. Peters, B.P., Ebisu, S., Goldstein, I.J., and Flashner, M. (1979).Biochemistry 18:5505–5510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhavanandan, V., and Katlic, A.W. (1979).J. Biol. Chem. 254:4000–4008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Briles, E.G., Li, E., and Kornfeld, S. (1977).J. Biol. Chem. 252:1107–1116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yogeeswaran, G. (1983).Adv. Cancer Res. 38:289–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dent, P.B., Clealand, G.B., and Liao, S.K. (1980).Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 8:27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rotman, B., and Papermaster, B.W. (1966).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 55:134–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Luria, S.E., and Delbruck, M. (1943).Genetics 28:491–511.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kerbel, R.S., Lagarde, A.E., Dennis, J.W., and Donaghue, T.P. (1983).Mol. Cell Biol. 3:523–538.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trowbridge, I.S., and Hyman, R. (1978).Eur. J. Immunol. 8:716–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dennis, J.W., and Kerbel, R.S. (1981).Cancer Res. 41:98–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frost, P., Kerbel, R.S., Bauer, E., Tartamella-Biondo, R., and Cefalu, W. (1983).Cancer Res. 43:125–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boon, T. (1983).Adv. Cancer Res. 39:121–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stanley, P., and Siminovitch, L. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:391–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dennis, J.W., Donaghue, T.P., and Kerbel, R.S. (1981).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 66:129–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kerbel, R.S., Lagarde, A.E., Dennis, J.W., Nestel, F.P., Donaghue, T.P., Siminovitch, L., and Fulchignoni-Lataud, C. (1984). InTumor Invasion and Metastasis, (ed.) Nicolson, G.L., and Milas, L. (Raven Press, New York), pp. 47–79.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stackpole, C.W. (1983).Cancer Res. 43:3057–3065.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Capizzi, R.L., and Jameson, J.W. (1973).Mutat. Res. 17:147–148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lagarde, A.E., Donaghue, T.P., Kerbel, R. et al. Metastatic properties of distinct phenotypic classes of lectin-resistant mutants isolated from murine MDAY-D2 cell line. Somat Cell Mol Genet 10, 503–519 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534855

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534855

Keywords

Navigation