Skip to main content
Log in

An operant counting scale for children

A preliminary methodological psychoactive-drug case study

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This pilot study is the first attempt at objective measurement of well-defined molecular behaviors through covert field observation. Though the main thrust is the development of a methodology for the clinical investigation of drug effects on children, a method that minimizes or overcomes many of the special problems that have plagued child drug research in the past, some preliminary data on the behavioral effects of haloperidol and imipramine were obtained. The technique developed is called an operant counting scale, and it promises to be useful in future full-drug studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant QR: Psychopharmacology in childhood emotional and mental disorders.J Pediat 61:626–37, 1962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fish B: Drug use in psychiatric disorders of children.Amer J Psychiat 124 (8):31–36, 1968.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nyhan WL: Developmental pharmacology. In RE Cooke (Ed),Biological Basis of Pediatric Practice. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Minde KK, Weiss, GC: The assessment of drug effects in children as compared to adults.J Child Psychiat 9(1):124–33, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg L, Conners CK: Psychopharmacology in childhood. In NB Talbot, J Kagan, and L Eisenberg (Eds),Behavioral Sciences in Pediatric Medicine. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zrull J, Westman J, Arthur B, et al: An evaluation of methodology used in the study of psychoactive drugs for children.J Child Psychiat 5:284–91, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Werry JS, Weiss G, Douglas V, et al: Studies on the hyperactive child: III. The effect of chlorpromazine upon behavior and learning ability.Child Psychiat 5:292–312, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conners CK, Eisenberg L: The effects of methylphenidate on symptomatology and learning in disturbed children.Amer J Psychiat 120:458–64, 1963.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Millichap JG, Boldrey E: Studies in hyperkinetic behavior.Neurol 17(2):467–71, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin M: Single subject designs for assessment of psychotropic drug effects in children.Child Psychiat Hum Dev 2:102–15, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sykes DH, Douglas VT, Weiss G, et al: Attention in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate.Child Psychiat Psychol 12(2):129–39, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conners CK: A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.Amer Psychiat 126(2):884–91, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kupietz S, Bialer I, Winsberg BG: A behavior rating scale for assessing improvement in behaviorally deviant children: A preliminary investigation.Amer J Psychiat 128(11):1432–36, 1972.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fish B, Campbell M, Shapiro T, et al: Comparison of trifluperidol, trigluoperazine, and chlorpromazine in preschool schizophrenic children: The value of less sedative antipsychotic agents.Curr Ther Res 11(10):589–95, 1969.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Freed H, Peifer CA: Treatment of hyperkinetic emotionally disturbed children with prolonged administration of chlorpromazine.Amer J Psychiat 113:22–26, 1956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenny TJ, Badie D, Baldwin RW: The effectiveness of a new drug-mesoridazine and chlorpromazine with behavior problems in children.J Ner Ment Dis 147(3):316–21, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bender L, Cottington F: The use of amphetamine sulfate (Benzedrine) in child psychiatry.Amer J Psychiat 99:116–21, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knobel M, Wolman MB, Mason E: Hyperkinesis: Organicity in children.Arch Gen Psychiat 1:310–21, 1959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenberg L, Gilbert A, Cytryn L, et al: The effectiveness of psychotherapy alone and in conjunction with perphenazine or placebo in the treatment of neurotic and hyperkinetic children.Amer J Psychiat 117:1088–93, 1961.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Knobel M: Psychopharmacology for the hyperkinetic child-dynamic considerations.Arch Gen Psychiat 6:198–202, 1962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zrull J, Westman J, Arthur B, et al: A comparison of diazepam, d-amphetamine, and placebo in the treatment of the hyperkinetic syndrome in children.Amer J Psychiat 121:338–89, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zrull J, et al: An evaluation of methodology used in the study of psychoactive drugs for children.J Child Psychiat 5:284–91, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burk W, Menolascino EJ: Haloperidol in emotionally disturbed mentally retarded individuals.Amer J Psychiat 124:1589–91, 1968.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ucer E, Kreger KC: A double-blind study comparing haloperidol with thioridazine in emotionally disturbed, mentally retarded children.Curr Ther Res 11(5):278–83, 1969.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. LeVann LJ: Haloperidol in the treatment of behavioral disorders in children and adolescents.Canad Psychiat Assoc 14:217–20, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lucas LR, Pasley FC: Psychoactive drugs in the treatment of emotionally disturbed children: Haloperidol and diazepam.Comprehens Psychiat 10(5):376–86, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  27. LeVann LJ: Clinical comparison of haloperidol with chlorpromazine in mentally retarded children.Amer J Ment Def 75(6):719–23, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Claghorn JL: A double-blind comparison of haloperidol (Haldol) and thioridazine (Mellaril) in outpatient children.Curr Ther Res 14(12):785–89, 1972.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fish B: Drug use in psychiatric disorders of children.Amer J Psychiat 124:31–36, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Millman HL: Psychoneurological learning and behavior problems: The importance of treatment considerations.J Clin Child Psychol 3:26–30, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spivack G, Levine M: The Devereux Child Behavior Rating Scales: A study of symptom behaviors in latency age atypical children.Amer J Ment Def 68:700–717, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spivack G, Spotts J: The Devereux Child Behavior Rating Scales: A study of symptom behaviors in latency age atypical children.Amer J Ment Def 69:839–53, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cunningham MA: A comparison of the language of psychotic and nonpsychotic children who are mentally retarded.J Child Psychiat Psychol 9:220–44, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wolff WM, Herrin B, Scarborough D, et al: Interaction of an instructional program with a psychotherapeutic milieu: Developmental direction for seriously disturbed children.Acta Paedopsychiat 39:83–92, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Sheinbein is Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Health Sciences Center in Dallas and can be contacted at Children's Medical Center, 1935 Amelia Street, Dallas, Texas 75235. Dr. Wiggins is also an assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Health Sciences Center, Dallas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheinbein, M.L., Wiggins, K.M. An operant counting scale for children. Child Psych Hum Dev 5, 142–149 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01433673

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01433673

Keywords

Navigation