Skip to main content
Log in

Level of consciousness and age as prognostic factors in aneurysmal SAH

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The prognostic value of the level of consciousness and the patient's age for the outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is studied in 74 patients admitted on day (D)0 to D3 after aneurysm rupture.

For the level of consciousness three groups of patients are compared: grade I+II (alert patients), grade III+IV (drowsy patients), and grade V (comatose patients). For the age, two groups are compared: patients aged under 50, and patients aged 50 and over. The timing of surgery was: D0–D3 51%, D4–D6 20%, D7 and later 18%, and No surgery 11%.

The overall management results were: Good (satisfactory result) 43%, Fair (moderately disabled) 18%, Poor (severely disabled+vegetative survival) 19%, and Death 20%. The outcome was strongly related to the level of consciousness, the rates of Good result decreasing from 71% (grades I–II) to 14% (grades III–IV) and to zero (grade V), and the mortality rates increasing respectively from 5% to 14% and 61%.

The relationship between outcome and age was less marked: 54% Good result under 50 and 30% over 50. Out of the Grade V group, 56% could be operated upon and 44% died before surgery. No patient from the other two groups died before surgery. The literature concerning the Grading Systems published so far and the various prognostic factors are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Botterel EH, Lougheed WM, Scott JW, Van Den Waper SL (1956) Hypothermia and interruption of carotid and vertebral circulation, in the surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 13: 1–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dautheribes M, Boulard G, Guerin J, Leman P (1985) Hémorragies sous arachnoïdiennes spontanées. Plaidoyer pour un système standard d'évaluation. Neurochirurgie 31: 37–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deruty R, Mottolese C, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Soustiel JF (1991) Management of the ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Early surgery, late surgery, or modulated surgery? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 113: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drake CG, Hunt WE, Sano K, Kassel N, Teasdale G, Pertuiset B, Devilliers JC (1988) Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Grading Scale. J Neurosurg 68: 985–986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber CJ, Lang DA, Neil-Dwyer G, Smith PWF (1993) A simple scoring system for accurate prediction of outcome within four days of a subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 122: 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hernesniemi J, Vapalathi M, Niskanen M, Tapaninaho A, Kari A, Luukkonen M, Puranen M, Saari T, Pajpar M (1993) One-year outcome in early aneurysm surgery: a 14-year experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 122: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunt WE, Hess RM (1968) Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysm. J Neurosurg 28: 14–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt WE, Kosnik EJ (1974) Timing and perioperative care in intracranial aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery 21: 79–89

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hunt WE, Kassell N, Pertuiset B, Sano K, Teasdale G, de Villier JC, Drake CG (1988) Report of the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. J Neurosurg 68: 985–986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inagawa T. (1993) Management outcome in the elderly patients following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 78: 554–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jennet B, Teasdale G, Braaman R, Minderhood J, Knill-Jones RP (1976) Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet 1: 1031–1034

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kassel NF, Torner JC, Haley EC, Jane JA, Adams HP, Kongable GL, (1990) The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 1: overall management results. J Neurosurg 73: 18–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindsay KW, Teasdale G, Knill-Jones RP, Murray C (1982) Observer variability in grading patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 56: 628–633

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindsay KW, Teasdale G, Knill-Jones RP (1983) Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoïd hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 58: 57–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyaoka M, Sato K, Ishii S (1993) A clinical study of the relationship of timing to outcome of surgery for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A retrospective analysis of 1622 cases. J Neurosurg 79: 373–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishioka H (1969) Report on the cooperative study of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoïd hemorrhage. Section VII. Part I. Evaluation of conservatory management for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 25: 574–592

    Google Scholar 

  17. Niskanen MM, Herniesniemi JA, Vapalahti MP, Kari A (1993) One year outcome in early aneurysm surgery: prediction of outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 123: 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sano K (1983) Cerebral vasospasm and aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurosurg 30: 13–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sano K, Tamura A (1985) A proposal for grading of SAH haemorrhage due to aneurysm rupture. In: Auer LM (ed) Timing of aneurysm surgery, de Grueyter, Berlin, pp 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saveland H, Hillman J, Brandt L, Edner G, Jakobsson KE, Algers G (1992) Overall outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. (A prospective study from neurosurgical units in Sweden during a 1-year period). J Neurosurg 76: 729–734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamura A (1987) Grading risk, angiography and computerized tomography. A grading system. In: Sano K, Asano T, Tamura A (eds) Acute aneurysm surgery. Physiopathology and management. Springer, Wien New York, pp 126–129

    Google Scholar 

  22. Teasdale GM, Knill-Jones RP, Lindsay KW (1983) Clinical assessment of SAH. J Neurosurg 59: 550–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Teasdale G, Knill-Jones RP, Van Der Sande J (1978) Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41: 603–610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deruty, R., Pelissou-Guyotat, I., Mottolese, C. et al. Level of consciousness and age as prognostic factors in aneurysmal SAH. Acta neurochir 132, 1–8 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404840

Keywords

Navigation