Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric hepatic CT: An injection protocol

  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. To determine an injection protocol for pediatric hepatic CT and to investigate the use of power injection.Materials and methods. Eighty-seven studies were prospectively performed using ioversol (320 mg iodine per cc) at 2 cc/kg. Three techniques were used: helical (1 s/slice); dynamic, non-breath-hold (5.5 s/slice); dynamic, breath-hold (10 s/slice) scans. The liver-scan time for each study was determined. Scan initiation ranged from 25 to 80 s. An injection duration (50–100 seconds) was selected. From the contrast volume (2 cc/kg × kg body wt) and injection duration, the injection rate (cc/s) was calculated for each patient. Each study was grouped by injection rate corrected for body weight (cc/kg/min) into: 1.2–1.5, 1.51–2.0, and 2.01–2.4. The aortic/liver attenuation curves were plotted for each group.Results. Liver-scan time for helical studies was a mean of 26 s, for dynamic, non-breath-hold studies 75 s, dynamic breath-hold scans were 154 s. Injection rates of 1.2–1.5 cc/kg/min produced a scanning interval of 165 s. Injection rates of 1.51–2.0 cc/kg/min produced a scanning interval of 120 s. Injection rates of 2.01–2.4 cc/kg/min produced a scanning interval of 90 s. There was no increase in hepatic attenuation for the injection rates 2.01–2.4 cc/kg/min compared with 1.51–2.0 cc/kg/min. There was one complication related to injection through a central line.Conclusions. An injection protocol was determined for helical studies with injection rates of 1.7–2.0 cc/kg/min with initiation at 60 s; for dynamic, non-breath-hold studies with injection rates of 1.5–1.7 cc/kg/min with initiation at 50 s; and for dynamic breath-hold studies with injection rates of 1.2–1.5 cc/kg/min with initiation at 45 s. Power injection was used safely in our population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cox IH, Foley WD, Hoffman RG (1991) Right window for dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 181: 18–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foley WD (1989) Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 170: 617–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walkey MM (1991) Dynamic hepatic CT: how many years will it take 'til we learn? Radiology 181: 17–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeny PC (1988) Hepatic CT: state of the art. Radiology 168: 319–323

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berland LL, Lee JY (1988) Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. Invest Radiol 23: 918–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Foley WD, Berland LL, Lawson TL, Smith DF, Thorsen MK (1983) Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomography scanning. Radiology 147:797–803

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Peterson JE, Bernardino ME (1989) Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. AJR 153: 973–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhns LR (1993) Optimal timing of abdominal CT in children: relationship to injection rate. Radiology 189: 49–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 829–836

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson JE, Hedlund LJ, Trenkner SW, Ritenour R, Halvorsen RA (1992) Safety consideration in the power injection of contrast media via central venous catheters during computed tomographic examinations. Invest Radiol 27: 337–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy S, Moss AA (1984) The use of a flow rate injector for contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Radiology 151: 800

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Claussen CD, Banzer D, Pfretzschner C, Kalender WA, Schorner W (1984) Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. Radiology 153: 365–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM, Dodd GD, Miller WJ (1994) Hepatic CTenhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients. Radiology 190: 721–725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roche, K.J., Genieser, N.B. & Ambrosino, M.M. Pediatric hepatic CT: An injection protocol. Pediatr Radiol 26, 502–507 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01372229

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01372229

Keywords

Navigation