Skip to main content
Log in

Responses to pure tones and linear FM components of the CF — FM biosonar signal by single units in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The responses of 682 single-units in the inferior colliculus (IC) of 13 mustached bats (Pteronotus parnellii parnellii) were measured using pure tones (CF), frequency modulations (FM) and pairs of CF — FM signals mimicking the species' biosonar signal, which are stimuli known to be essential to the responses of CF/CF and FM — FM facilitation neurons in auditory cortex.

  2. 2.

    Units were arbitrarily classified into ‘reference frequency’ (RF), ‘FM2’ and ‘Non-echolocation’ (NE) categories according to the relationship of their best frequencies (BF) to the biosonar signal frequencies (Table 1). RF units have high Q10dB values and are tuned to the reference frequency of each bat, which ranged between 60.73 and 62.73 kHz (Table 2). FM2 units had BF's between 50 and 60 kHz, while NE units had BF's outside the ranges of the RF and FM2 classes.

  3. 3.

    PST histograms of the responses revealed discharge patterns such as ‘onset’, ‘onset-bursting’ (most common), ‘on-off’, ‘tonic-on’, ‘pauser’, and ‘chopper’ (Fig. 2). Changes in discharge patterns usually resulted from changes in the frequency and/or intensity of the stimuli, most often involving a change from onset-bursting to on-off. Different patterns were also elicited by CF and FM stimuli (Fig. 6).

  4. 4.

    Frequency characteristics and thresholds to CF and FM stimuli were measured. RF neurons (Fig. 3) were very sharply tuned with Q10dB's ranging from 50–360. Most (92%) also responded to FM2 stimuli, but 78% were significantly more sensitive (>5dB) to CF stimuli, and only 3% had significantly lower thresholds to FM2 (Table 4). The best initial frequency for FM2 sweeps in RF units was 65.35+-2.138 kHz (n=118), well above the natural frequency of the 2nd harmonic (Table 2). FM2 and NE units were indistinguishable from each other, but were quite different from RF units: 41 % of these two classes had lower thresholds to CF, 49% were about equally sensitive, and 10% had lower thresholds to FM. For FM2 units, mean best initial frequency for FM was 60.94 kHz±3.162 kHz (n=114), which is closely matched to the 2nd harmonic in the biosonar signal. Very few units (5) responded only to FM signals, i.e., were FM-specialized.

  5. 5.

    The characteristics of spike-count functions were determined in 587 units (Table 5). The vast majority (79%) of RF units (n=228) were non-monotonic, and about 22% had upper-thresholds. FM2 units (77=174) were more evenly divided, 46% monotonic and 54% non-monotonic, while 52% of NE units were monotonie, 48% non-monotonic.

  6. 6.

    Responses to CF — FM stimuli mimicking the biosonar signal of FM2 units depended on the unit's particular thresholds and BF's to CF and FM stimuli alone (Fig. 7). During echolocation, FM2 units could be excited only by FM2 components in either or both the emitted pulse and returning echo, but some that had high CFBF's (> 57 kHz) would also respond to moderate-to-high intensity CF components of Doppler-shifted echoes.

  7. 7.

    In response to 1st or 2nd harmonic pulse-echo pairs of CF — FM stimuli, FM2 units showed no facilitation at specific time delays like that seen in the FM — FM area of auditory cortex (Fig. 8). For RF units, 2nd harmonic-CF responses were often suppressed by adding the fundamentals, while such CF1/CF2 stimulus pairs caused facilitation in the CF1/CF2 region of cortex.

  8. 8.

    It is concluded that facilitation by pairs of CF harmonics or FM components with specific time delays is a response property of units only at levels higher than the inferior colliculus in the mustached bat. However, the properties of RF, FM2, and NE units tuned to the 30 kHz-fundamental (‘FM1’ units) are similar to the frequency and intensity characteristics of cortical facilitation units, and they are likely to subserve the neural circuitry in the MGB or auditory cortex responsible for such facilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IC :

inferior colliculus

MGB :

medial geniculate body

CF :

constant frequency

RF :

reference frequency

FM :

frequency modulation

H 1 H 2,H 3,H 4 :

four CF — FM harmonics of the mustached bat biosonar signal

CF 1,CF 2,CF 3,CF 4 :

four CF components of the harmonics,H 1 toH 4

FM 1,FM 2,FM 3,FM 4 :

four FM components of the harmonicsH 1 toH 4

BF :

best frequency

MT :

minimum threshold

Q 10dB :

BF/band-width of the tuning curve 10 dB above MT

PSTH :

peristimulus-time histogram

dB SPL :

dB re 2×10−5 Pa

NE :

non-echolocation

References

  • Asanuma A, Wong D, Suga N (1983) Frequency and amplitude representations in anterior primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurophysiol 50:1182–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhamer RD, Pollak G (1983) Response characteristics of single units in the inferior colliculus of mustache bats to sinusoidally frequency modulated signals. J Comp Physiol 153:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhamer RD, Pollak G, Marsh DS (1979) Coding of fine frequency information by echoranging neurons in the inferior colliculus of the Mexican free-tailed bat. Brain Res 171:530–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson DW, Goodman S (1979) An adaptation of the jet stream microelectrode beveler. Science 205:1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooler DM, O'Neill WE (1983) Stimulus-dependent labelling with [14C]-2-deoxyglucose in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 65.6

  • Griffin DR (1958) Listening in the dark. Yale Univ Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell AD (1970) Comparative auditory physiology of neotropical bats employing different echolocation signals. Z Vergl Physiol 68:117–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick A, Vaisnys R (1964) Echolocation of flying insects by the bat,Chilonycteris parnellii. Biol Bull 128:297–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JF, Suga N (1983) Combination-sensitive neurons in the uditory thalamus of the mustached bat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 225.13

  • O'Neill WE, Suga N (1979) Target range-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. Science 203:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill WE, Suga N (1982) Encoding of target range and its representation in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurosci 2:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak GD, Bodenhamer RD (1981) Specialized characteristics of single units in inferior colliculus of mustache bat: frequency representation, tuning and discharge patterns. J Neurophysiol 46:605–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak GD, Henson OW, Novick A (1972) Cochlear microphonic audiograms in the ‘pure-tone’ batChilonycteris parnellii parnellii. Science 176:66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak GD, Bodenhamer RD, Marsh DS, Souther A (1977) Recovery cycles of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of unanaesthetized bats obtained with frequency-modulated and constant-frequency sounds. J Comp Physiol 120:215–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak GD, Marsh DS, Bodenhamer RD, Souther A (1978) A single unit analysis of inferior colliculus in unanaesthetized bats: response patterns and spike-count functions generated by constant-frequency and frequency-modulated sounds. J Neurophysiol 41:677–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak GD, Bodenhamer RD, Zook JM (1983) Cochleotopic organization of the mustache bat's inferior colliculus. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology, Plenum Press, New York London, pp 925–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU (1968) Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermäuse in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU (1970) Echoortung bei der FledermausChilonycteris rubiginosa. Z Vergl Physiol 68:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G, Pollak GD (1979) Disproportionate frequency representation in the inferior colliculus of Doppler-compensating greater horseshoe bats: evidence for an acoustic fovea. J Comp Physiol 132:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1971) The sonar receiver of the bat. Ann NY Acad Sci 188:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1973) The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 54:157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Howell DJ, Suga N (1975) Information content of bat sonar cries. Am Sci 63:204–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Fenton MB, O'Farrell MJ (1979) Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science 203:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1964a) Single unit activity in cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus of echo-locating bats. J Physiol 172:449–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1964b) Recovery cycles and responses to frequency modulated tone pulses in auditory neurones of echo-locating bats. J Physiol 175:50–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1965) Analysis of frequency-modulated sounds by auditory neurones of echo-locating bats. J Physiol 179:26–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1968) Analysis of frequency-modulated and complex sounds by single auditory neurones of bats. J Physiol 198:51–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1969) Classification of inferior collicular neurones of bats in terms of responses to pure tones, FM sounds and noise bursts. J Physiol 200:555–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1970) Echo-ranging neurons in the inferior colliculus of bats. Science 170:449–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1973) Feature extraction in the auditory system of bats. In: Møller AR (ed) Basic mechanisms in hearing. Academic Press, New York London, pp 474–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1984) Neural mechanisms of complex-sound processing for echolocation. Trends NeuroSci 7:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Jen PHS (1976) Disproportionate tonotopic representation for processing CF — FM sonar signals in the mustache bat auditory cortex. Science 194:542–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Jen PHS (1977) Further studies on the peripheral auditory system of CF — FM bats specialized for fine frequency analysis of Doppler-shifted echoes. J Exp Biol 69:207–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Manabe T (1982) Neural basis of amplitude-spectrum representation in auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurophysiol 47:225–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, O'Neill WE (1979) Neural axis representing target range in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. Science 206:351–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, O'Neill WE (1980) Auditory processing of echoes: representation of acoustic information from the environment in the bat cerebral cortex. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems, Plenum Press, New York London, pp 589–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Schlegel P (1973) Coding and processing in the auditory systems of FM-signal-producing bats. J Acoust Soc Am 54:174–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Simmons JA, Jen PHS (1975) Peripheral specialization for fine frequency analysis of Doppler-shifted echoes in the auditory system of the CF — FM batPteronotus parnellii. J Exp Biol 63:161–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, O'Neill WE, Manabe T (1978) Cortical neurons sensitive to combinations of information-bearing elements of biosonar signals in the mustached bat. Science 200:778–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, O'Neill WE, Manabe T (1979) Harmonic-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. Science 203:270–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, O'Neill WE, Kujirai K, Manabe T (1983) Specificity of ‘combination-sensitive’ neurons for processing complex biosonar signals in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurophysiol 49:1573–1626

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappe M, Schnitzler HU (1982) Doppler-shift compensation in insect-catching horseshoe bats. Naturwissenschaften 69:193–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Vater M (1981) Single unit responses to linear frequency-modulations in the inferior colliculus of the greater horseshoe bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 141:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Vater M, Schlegel P (1979) Comparative auditory neurophysiology of the inferior colliculus of two molossid bats,Molossus ater andMolossus molossus. II. Single unit responses to frequency-modulated signals and signal and noise combinations. J Comp Physiol 131:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook JM, Winer JA, Pollak GD, Bodenhamer RD (1985) Topology of the central nucleus of the mustache bat's inferior colliculus: correlation of single unit properties and neuronal architecture. J Comp Neurol 231:530–546

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Neill, W.E. Responses to pure tones and linear FM components of the CF — FM biosonar signal by single units in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat. J. Comp. Physiol. 157, 797–815 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350077

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350077

Keywords

Navigation