Skip to main content
Log in

AIDS in the public eye: Is the epidemic viewed as a crisis?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine public opinion about the importance of AIDS as a social and policy issue, we conducted a telephone survey of a nationwide random probability sample of adults in the United States, summer 1991. Thirteen hundred and fifty adults completed the survey. The response rate was 63%. We found that 93% of respondents believe that AIDS is a crisis, and 90% believe that AIDS in the US is out of control. In addition, most people reported believing that the government should spend as much as necessary to solve the AIDS epidemic and that AIDS is a problem for everyone in society, not just those who have the disease. Respondents who had a personal connection to the AIDS epidemic (e.g., knew someone infected with HIV) and those who did not have such a connection equally believe that AIDS is an important social and political issue. In conclusion, we found that AIDS is being accorded great importance by the majority of the US public, regardless of demographic group membership and individual personal connection to the epidemic. However, AIDS scientists must be mindful of potential shifts in public opinion when considering strategies to disseminate research findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Center for Health Statistics, Dawson DA, Cynamon M, Fitti JE. AIDS knowledge and attitudes. Provisional data from the National Health Interview Survey: United States, August 1987.Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics. No. 146. DHHS Pub No (PHS) 88-1250. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. AIDS: America's most important health problem.Gallup Report #268–269:Jan/Feb 1988.

  3. Concar D. Budget division disputed.Nature 344:803, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beck M. AIDS research gets the grants; spending on other diseases is slowing.Newsweek 10:46, March 6, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krauthammer C. AIDS: Getting more than its share.Time 80, June 25, 1990.

  6. Fumento M.The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS. New York: Basic Books. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garrison J. The AIDS research backlash.San Francisco Chronicle December 17, 1989:A-1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Page B, Shapiro R. Effects of public opinion on policy.American Political Science Review 77:175–190, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Monroe A. Consistency between public preferences and national policy decisions.American Politics Quarterly 7:3–19, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hilgartner S, Bosk C. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model.American Journal of Sociology 94:53–78, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Downs A. Up and down with ecology—The “issue-attention cycle”.Public Interest 28:28–50. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O'Rourke D, Blair J. Improving random respondent selection in telephone surveys.Journal of Marketing Research 20:428–32, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oldendick R, Bishop G, Sorenson S, Tuchfarber A. A comparison of the Kish and last birthday methods of respondent selection in telephone surveys.Journal of Official Statistics 4:307–18, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Groves RM, Lyberg LE. An overview of nonresponse issues in telephone surveys. In: RM Groves, PP Biemer, LE Lyberg, JT Massey, WL Nicholls II, J Waksberg, (Eds.)Telephone survey methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988: Pp. 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fowler F.Survey Research Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lavrakas P.Telephone Survey Methods: Sampling, Selection, and Supervision. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fleiss JL.Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Massey JT, Botman SL. Weighting adjustments for random digit dialed surveys. In: RM Groves, PP Biemer, LE Lyberg, JT Massey, WL Nicholls II, J Waksberg, (Eds.)Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988: Pp. 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Babbie ER.Survey Research Methods. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Publishing Co. Inc., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerbert B, Sumser J, Maguire BT. The impact of who you know and where you live on opinions about AIDS and health care.Soc Sci Med 32:677–81, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gerbert B, Bleecker T, Berlin M, Coates TJ. HIV-infected health care professionals: Public opinion about testing, disclosing, and switching.Arch Int Med in press.

  22. Gallup G Jr., Newport F. Large majorities continue to back AIDS testing.Gallup Poll Monthly #308:25–28, May 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hugick L. 1992 Presidential campaign.Gallup Poll Monthly #319:2–6, April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krieger L. AIDS apathy alarms doctors.San Francisco Examiner January 26, 1992:A-1, 16.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Barbara Gerbert is Associate Professor of Behavioral Sciences and Chair of the Division of Behavioral Sciences, Thomas Bleecker, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Behavioral Sciences, both at the School of Dentistry and the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, USA

We would like to thank Nona Caspers for her writing and editorial suggestions on earlier drafts.

The study was funded by Center grant No. MH42459 from the National Institute of Mental Health and by the Universitywide Task Force on AIDS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerbert, B., Bleecker, T. AIDS in the public eye: Is the epidemic viewed as a crisis?. J Community Health 18, 335–346 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323965

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323965

Keywords

Navigation