Skip to main content
Log in

Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limiting the widespread use of 24-hr pH monitoring is the necessity of manometrically placing the pH probe 5 cm above the proximal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) border. Therefore, we prospectively compared LES localization by gastroesophageal pH step-up with manometry in 71 patients and 14 asymptomatic volunteers. The gastroesophageal pH step-up significantly correlated with the proximal LES border in patients (r=0.53, P<0.0001) and volunteers (r=0.91, P<0.0001). Based on previously published criteria, the pH step-up value was considered acceptably accurate if it was within ±3 cm (6 cm total span) of the manometrically determined proximal LES border. In 58% of patients and 29% of volunteers the pH step-up occurred outside this accuracy range. Esophagitis (P=0.015) and abnormal reflux parameters (P=0.002) were variables contributing to this error. Subsequent analysis found that the pH step-up overestimated the proximal LES border and occurred at the midportion of the sphincter. The pH step-up still inaccurately located the mid LES in 34% of patients. Therefore, manometry should remain the standard for accurate LES localization prior to placing the pH probe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter JE, Castell DO: Gastroesophageal Reflux: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med 97(1):93–103, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spencer J: Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastrooesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 56:912–914, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR: Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62:325–332, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johansson KE, Tibbling L: Gastric secretion and reflux pattern in reflux, oesophagitis before and during ranitidine treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol 21:487–492, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hasse GM, Ross MN, Gance-Cleveland B, Kolack KE: Extended four-channel esophageal pH monitoring: The importance of acid reflux patterns at the middle and proximal levels. J Pediatr Surg 23(1):32–37, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lehman G, Rogers D, Cravens E, Flueckiger J: Prolonged pH probe testing less than 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES): Establishing normal control values. Gastroenterology 98(5):A77, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ward BW, Wu WC, Richter JE, Lui KW, Castell DO: Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Technology searching for a clinical application. J Clin Gastroenterol 8(suppl 1):59–67, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richter JE, DeMeester TR, Wu WC, Sinclair JW, Schan C, Bradley LA: Normal 24-hour esophageal pH values: Influence of age and gender. Gastroenterology 98(5):A112, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thurer R, DeMeester T, Johnson L: The distal esophageal sphincter and its relationship to gastroesophageal reflux. J Surg Res 16(4):418–423, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klauser AG, Heinrich CA, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA: Esophageal 24-hr pH monitoring: Is prior manometry necessary for correct positioning of the electrode? Am J Gastroenterol 85:1463–1467, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalton CB: The manometric study.In Esophageal Motility Testing. DO Castell, JE Richter, CB Dalton (es) New York. Elsevier Science Publishing, 1987, pp 35–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson KE, Cheng SC: The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155:104–111, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marples MI, Mughal M, Bancewicz J: Can oesophageal pH electrode be accurately positioned without manometry?In Diseases of the Esophagus JR Siewert, AH Holscher (eds). Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1987, pp 789–791

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walther B, DeMeester TR: Placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.In Esophageal Disorders. TR DeMeester, DB Skinner (eds). New York, Raven Press, 1985, pp 539–541

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lehman G, O'Connor K, Cravens E, Flueckiger J, Kopecky K: Does placement of pH probes less than 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) produce falsely positive gastroesophageal reflux? Gastroenterology 94(5):A255, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sondheimer JM, Hanse GM: Simultaneous pH recordings from multiple esophageal sites in children with and without distal gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 7(1):46–51, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bland J, Altman D: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  18. DeVault KR, Castell DO: A simplified technique for accurate placement of ambulatory pH probes. Am J Gastroenterol 86:380–381, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh S, Price JP, Richter JE: The LES locater—accurate pH recordings with single intubation. Am J Gastroenterol 86:55A, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattox, H.E., Richter, J.E., Sinclair, J.W. et al. Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter. Digest Dis Sci 37, 1185–1191 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296558

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296558

Key Words

Navigation