Conclusion
A brief description of various socio-ecological models and their data requirements have been presented in this paper. It is evident that there is an enormous gap between the need for the data on the “quality of life” and the actual supply of such data. It has been argued that any model building effort in the area of ecological system must wait until an adequate data base is established. However, the identification of data requirements for the construction of such models points out the characteristics of statistical information system that should be established.
As it has been pointed out by Hirsch, “Statistical agencies will drag their feet in the development of needed data if no guidelines for collection are provided” [Hirsch (6), p. vi].
The construction and interpretation of any social indicators should require more theoretical analysis as to the meaning of the measurement of such indicators and interrelationships among variables.
Extensive theoretical as well as empirical work on submodels by different disciplines must precede any attempt to build a truly comprehensive socioecological model. However, the constant interaction among different disciplines to exchange information on their research findings and to discuss implications of such findings to other disciplines should be carried out simultaneously in order to understand the impact of human activities to environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Watt, Kenneth, et al.,A Model of Society, Environmental Systems Group, Institute of Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, April 1969.
Bauer, Raymond A. (ed.),Social Indicators (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1966).
Center for Urban Studies, Wayne State University,Social Reporting in Michigan: Problems and Issues (Lansing, Michigan, Office of Planning Coordination, Bureau of Policies and Programs, 1970).
Environmental Quality, The First Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality (Government Printing Office, August 1970).
Hirsch, Werner Z., et al., “Application of Input-Output Techniques to Quality of Urban Life Indicators,” a paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, January 11–15, 1971, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hirsch, Werner Z., and Sidney Sonenblum,Selecting Regional Information for Government Planning Decision Making (NewYork: Praeger Publishers, 1970).
Isard, Walter, et al., “On the Linkage of Socio-Economic and Ecological Systems,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. XXI, 1968, pp. 79–99.
Koopmans, T. C., “Measurement Without Theory,”Review of Economics and Statistics, May 1947.
Leontief, Wasily, “Environmental Repercussion and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach,”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. LII, August 1970, pp. 262–271.
Perloff, Harvey S., (ed.),The Quality of the Urban Environment (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1968).
Strumpel, Burkhard, et al., “Indicators of Changes in People's Goals, Opportunities and Economic Well-Being,”AProposal to National Science Foundation, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, April 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
He wishes to thank Dr. Tom Dinell, University of Hawaii, for his helpful suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joun, Y.P. Information requirement for socio-ecological models. Ann Reg Sci 5, 25–32 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288110
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288110