Abstract
An electroanalytical study of the herbicide propazine's reduction process in micellar solutions and oil-in-water emulsions is reported. The anionic surfactant sodium pentanesulphonate was chosen as the most suitable. The differential pulse polarograms of micellar solutions had two reduction peaks below pH 2.0, whereas only one peak was obtained above pH 2.O. Ethyl acetate was chosen as the organic solvent to form propazine emulsions. Unlike in micellar solutions, the DPP polarograms of propazine emulsions showed only one peak even at pH < 2.0, suggesting that propazine hydrolysis was hindered in the emulsified medium. The limiting current is diffusion-controlled and the electrode process is irreversible. Propazine can be determined by differential pulse polarography over the 1.0 × 10−1 − 1.0 × 10−1moll−1 and 1.0 × 10−15 − 4.0 × 10−1 moll−1 concentration ranges and the limit of detection was 2.8 × 10−1 moll−1. Of the potential interferents simazine, methoprotryne and terbutryn (alls-triazines), thiram (a dithiocarbamate), dinoseb (nitrophenolic), and heptachlor (chlorinated cyclo-diene herbicide), only the first two were significant (10% error for equimolar concentrations). The method was applied to the determination of propazine in spiked drinking water. At a concentration level of 2.0 × 10−1 moll−1 a recovery of 94 ± 6% was obtained, after tenfold concentration on Sep-Pak.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Ramsteiner, W. D. Hörmann, D. O. Eberle,J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1974,57, 102.
E. Primo Yúfera, J. M. Carrasco Dorrién,Ouimica Agrícola II: Plaguicidas y Fitorreguladores, Alhambra, Madrid, 1980.
K. Burger, J. Koehler, H. Jork,J. Planar Chromatogr. Mod TLC 1990,3, 504.
K. W. Edwell, E. L. Jenkins, V. López-Avila, J. E. Longbottom,J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1991,74, 259.
V. Coquart, M. C. Hennion,J. Chromatogr. 1991,553, 329.
C. Schett,Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 1991,339, 344.
Method for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, EP A/600/4-88-039, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati,1988.
M. Stasny, H. Benadiková, J. Nepozitek, R. Volf,Sb. Vys. Sk. Chem. Technol. Praze. Anal. Chem. 1982,H17, 69.
M. T. Lippolis, V. Concialini,Talanta 1988,35, 235.
R. Gálvez, M. Pedreto, F. J. Manuel de Villena, J. M. Pingarrón, L. M. Polo,Anal. Chim. Acta 1993,273, 343.
A. J. Reviejo, A. Samprón, J. M. Pingarrón, L. M. Polo,Electroanalysis 1992,4, 111.
E. M. Thurman, M. Meyer, M. Pomes, C. A. Perry, P. Schwab,Anal. Chem. 1990,62, 2.023.
S. Marchidan,Rev. Roum. Chim. 1977,22, 127.
V. Pacáková, I. Nemec,J. Chromatogr. 1978,148, 273.
D. C. Muir, B. E. Baker,J. Agric. Food. Chem. 1976,24, 122.
ACS Committee on Environmental Improvement,Anal. Chem. 1983,55, 2210.
K. Hasabe, J. Osteryoung,Anal. Chem. 1975,47, 2412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mateos, M.A., Gálvez, R., de Villena, F.J.M. et al. Determination of propazine by differential pulse polarography in micellar and emulsified media. Mikrochim Acta 120, 339–349 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244444
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244444