Abstract
The major sources of uncertainty of a method for determination of Pb in whole blood by atomic absorption spectrometry were identified. The combined uncertainty was compared to the experimentally determined variation and a satisfactory agreement was found, indicating that no significant sources of uncertainty have been overlooked and that the method is in a state of statistical control. The findings suggest that the major source of uncertainty at low concentrations are random fluctuations (noise) of the atomic signal. Therefore, if improvement of the method performance is needed, only actions directed towards enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio are suitable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Molin Christensen, O. M. Poulsen, T. Anglov,J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 1992,7, 329.
J. Molin Christensen, O. M. Poulsen, T. Anglov,Handbook on Metals in Clinical and Analytical Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994, pp 45–61.
Guide to Expression of Measurement Uncertainty, BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, Genève, Switzerland, 1993.
Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Eurachem Workshop, draft ver. 5, September 1994.
K. Heydorn,Mikrochim. Acta 1992,III, 1.
P. Armitage, G. Berry,Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2nd Ed., Blackwell, Oxford, England, 1987.
J. C. Miller, J. N. Miller,Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, 3rd Ed., Ellis Horwood, New York, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristiansen, J., Molin Christensen, J. & Nielsen, J.L. Uncertainty of atomic absorption spectrometry: Application to the determination of lead in blood. Mikrochim Acta 123, 241–249 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244397
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244397