Summary
The concepts of both the traditional DSL (Dipole Source Localization) and MUSIC (Multiple Signal Classification) are explained using simple vectors. DSL and MUSIC differ in the way the weighting functions are found. In both DSL and MUSIC, the fitted generator magnitudes are found by projecting the recorded potential map onto the fitted weighting functions, and the model transfers the weighting functions into generator locations/orientations. Both DSL and MUSIC will cause errors in the fitted dipole parameters when there is model misspecification, noise, or both. Therefore, an accurate head model is essential for either method to give reliable results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cuffin, B.N. A comparison of moving dipole inverse solutions using EEG and MEG's. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1985, BME-32: 905–910.
de Munck, J.C. The potential distribution in a layered anisotropic spheroidal volume conductor. J. Appl. Phys., 1988 64: 464–470.
Franssen, H., Stegeman, D.F., Moleman, J. and Schoobaar, R.P. Dipole modelling of median nerve SEPs in normal subjects and patients with small subcortical infarcts. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 401–417.
He, B. and Musha, T. Equivalent dipole estimation of spontaneous EEG alpha activity: two-moving dipole approach. Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput., 1992, 30: 324–332.
Henderson, C.J., Butler, S.R. and Glass, A. Analysis of EEG potential fields in terms of multiple equivalent dipoles. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1977, 43: 770.
Jewett, D.L., Martin, W.H., Sininger, Y.S. and Gardi, J.N. The 3-channel lissajous' trajectory of the auditory brain-stem response. I. Introduction and overview. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 68: 323–326.
Kavanagh, R.N., Darcey, T.M., Lehmann, D. and Fender, D.H. Evaluation of methods for three-dimensional localization of electrical sources in the human brain. IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Eng., 1978, 25: 421–429.
Lehmann, D., Darcey, T.M. and Skrandies, W. Intracerebral and scalp fields evoked by hemiretinal checkerboard reversal, and modeling of their dipole generators. In: J. Courjon, F. Mauguiere and M. Revol (Eds.), Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology. Raven Press, New York, 1982: 41–48.
Mosher, J.C, Lewis, P.S. and Leahy, R.M. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1992, 39: 541–557.
Scherg, M. Functional imaging and localization of electromagnetic brain activity. Brain Topography, 1992 5: 103–111.
Scherg, M. and van Cramon, D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985a 62: 32–44.
Scherg, M. and van Cramon, D. A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I–V: Results of a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985b, 62: 290–299.
Turetsky, B., Raz, J. and Fein, G. Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: application to the auditory P300. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1990, 76: 540–556.
Zhang, Z. and Jewett, D.L. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 88: 1–11.
Zhang, Z. and Jewett, D.L. Model misspecification detection by means of Multiple-Generator Error, using the observed potential map. Brain Topography, 1994, 7(1): 29–39.
Zhang, Z., Jewett, D.L. and Goodwill, G. Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points. Brain Topography, 1994, 6: 283–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grant R01DC00328 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Diseases. We thank Dan Fletcher for his suggestions on the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Jewett, D.L. DSL and MUSIC Under model misspecification and noise-conditions. Brain Topogr 7, 151–161 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186773
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186773