Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the three-genome hybridLycopersicon esculentum Mill. —L. chilense Dun. —L. peruvianum var ‘humifusum’ Mill. and its use as a source for resistance

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

L. peruvianum var ‘humifusum’ is reproductively the most isolated of the species of the genusLycopersicon. It can be crossed with the cultivated tomato usingL. chilense as an intermediary. After a series of backcrosses of the three-genome hybrid F1 (L. esculentum ×L. chilense) ×L. peruvianum var ‘humifusum’ withL. esculentum, accompanied by selection for resistance to some economically important diseases, several lines were established. One of these lines, Cm 180, which showed resistance toClavibacter michiganensis subsp.michiganensis, was subjected to genetic analysis. This resistance was found to be controlled by a single dominant gene (Cm) that was not allelic to the gene originating fromL. hirsutum f.glabratum. ThisCm gene was genetically mapped on chromosome 4. The germ plasm ofL. peruvianum var ‘humifusum’ in combination withL. chilense was transferred intoL. esculentum. Different breeding lines possessing resistance to various diseases and pests could be developed from this material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bogatzevska N (1988)Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato the pathogen causing bacterial speck of tomatoes. Plant Sci 7:25 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Botev A (1986) Evaluation of genusLycopersicon for breeding of resistance toFusarium oxysporum (Schlecht) f. sp.lycopersici (Sacc) Synd & Hans. PhD thesis, University of Plovdiv

  • Cirulli M (1974) Resistenza del pomodoro verso le malattie. Genet Agric 28:317–356

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, Honma S (1976) Evaluation of screening techniques and determination of criteria for assessing resistance toCorynebacterium michiganense in tomato. Euphytica 25:405–414

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, Honma S (1976) Inheritance of resistance toCorynebacterium michiganense in tomato. J Hered 67:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AA, Strider DL, Konsler TL (1968) Application of cotyledonory symptoms in screening for resistance of tomato to bacterial canker and host range studied. Phytopathology 58:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz J (1972) Notice of release of bacterial canker resistant tomato breeding line H-2990. US Dep Agric Commun No.

  • Hogenboom NG (1979) Incompatibility and incongruity inLycopersicon. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The biology and taxonomy of theSolanaceae. Academic Press, London, pp 435–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuriyama T, Kuniyssu K (1974) Studies on the breeding of disease resistant tomato by interspecific hybridization. III. On the breeding of a new tomato line resistant to bacterial canker byCorynebacterium michiganense. Bull Ornamental Groups Res Sta Jpn Ser A 2:105–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Laterrot H (1974) Value of the resistance of the tomato Bulgaria 12 toCorynebacterium michiganense (Smith) Jensen. In: Eucarpia tomato working group. Bari

  • Laterrot H, Rat B (1987) Stability of the resistance toCorynebacterium michiganense of the tomato line ‘Okitso Sozai 1-20’. In: Modern trends in tomato genetics and breeding (Eucarpia tomato working group). Salerno

  • Lindhout P (1987) Resistance againstCorynebacterium michiganense found inLycopersicon peruvianum. In: Modern trends in tomato genetics and breeding (Eucarpia tomato working group). Salerno

  • Lindhout P (1989) Investigation of tomato breeding for resistance toCorynebacterium michiganense. In: XII Eucarpia Congr. Göttingen

  • Rick CM (1963) Barriers to interbreeding inLycopersicon peruvianum. Evolution 17:216–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM (1979) Biosystematic studies inLycopersicon and closely related species ofSolanum. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London, pp 667–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM, Lamm R (1955) Biosystematic studies on the status ofLycopersicon chilense. Am J Bot 44:663–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotirova V, Beleva I. (1977) Resistance of wild species tomatoes toCorynebacterium michiganense (Smith) Jensen. Hortic Vitic Sci 14:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotirova V, Beleva L (1978) Resistance of interspecific tomato hybrids toCorynebacterium michiganense (Smith) Jensen. In: Eucarpia of tomato working group. Leningrad

  • Sotirova V, Bogatzevska N (1988) New sources of resistance toPseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Okabe) Young et al. CR Acad Bulg sci T 41:1541–1543

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotirova V, Georgiev Chr (1981) Resistance of wild species of varying origins to White greenhouse fly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum West). Genet Plant Breed 14:372–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamova L (1987) Breeding of resistance in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). PhD thesis, University of Plovdiv

  • Stevens WL (1939) Tables of the recombination fraction estimated from the product ratio. J Genet 39:171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyr BD (1969) Additional sources of resistance to Bacterial canker of tomato. Plant Dis Rep 53:234–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyr BD (1976) Inheritance of resistance toCorynebacterium michiganense in tomato. Phytopathology 66:1116–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Vito M, Lamberti F (1978) Resistance of tomato varieties and hybrids to italian population ofMeloidogyne incognita. In: Eucarpia of tomato working group. Leningrad

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M. Koornneef

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vulkova, Z.V., Sotirova, V.G. Study of the three-genome hybridLycopersicon esculentum Mill. —L. chilense Dun. —L. peruvianum var ‘humifusum’ Mill. and its use as a source for resistance. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 87, 337–342 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184920

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184920

Key words

Navigation