Skip to main content
Log in

Merkel cells are not the mechanosensory transducers in the touch dome of the rat

  • Published:
Journal of Neurocytology

Summary

The identity of the mechanosensory transducing elements in the vertebrate touch receptors that contain Merkel cell-neurite complexes is unknown. The Merkel cells, however, have long been the favoured candidates. We have now selectively eliminated the Merkel cells from rat touch domes by first loading them with quinacrine, and then irradiating the domes with near-UV light. Mechanical stimulation of these domes revealed a range of mechanosensory function, evaluated qualitatively, that varied from non-responsive to normal. Since irradiation eliminated the quinacrine fluorescence, the status of the Merkel cells was evaluated by EM. In both responsive and unresponsive domes fixed for EM immediately following irradiation, the Merkel cells and associated nerve endings appeared to be normal. After 2 or more days, even in domes that continued to be normally responsive, there was a striking reduction in the normal complement of about 90 Merkel cells, and most of the remaining Merkel cells appeared to be degenerating. However, numerous ‘isolated’ (Merkel cell-free) nerve endings remained in the basal epidermis. A few of these nerve endings showed signs of damage, but in the non-responsive domes abnormal nerve endings were routinely observed. The EM studies did not exclude the possibility that a few surviving innervated Merkel cells, or even one such, had escaped detection and were responsible for a persisting mechanosensitivity. To resolve this issue a mechanical stimulating technique with a spatial resolution of 55 μm was used to map the mechanosensory profile of a single responsive dome irradiated 2.75 days earlier. This dome was then serially sectioned for EM study. Only seven Merkel cells had survived which appeared to be both viable and innervated, but almost all of the tested sites were normally responsive. When the correlation was made, seven of these sites were located 55–100 μm away from the nearest surviving Merkel cell, four were 110–165 μm away, and three were more than 165 μm away. Even when allowance is made for errors in the positioning of the stimulus, the responses at the last seven sites cannot be attributed to the presence of underlying Merkel cells. We conclude that mechanosensory transduction within touch domes is not a function of the Merkel cells, but must reside in the associated nerve endings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumann, K. I., Haman, W. &Leung, M. S. (1990) Acute effects on neomycin on slowly adapting type I and type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the anaesthetized cat and rat.Journal of Physiology 425, 527–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breathnach, A. S. (1971)an Atlas of the Ultrastructure of Human Skin. London: J. A. Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breathnach, A. S. (1977) Electron microscopy of cutaneous nerves and receptors.Journal of Investigative Dermatology 69, 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz, G. L., Tweedle, C. D. &Johnson, J. I. (1980) The development of receptors in the glabrous forepaw of skin of pouch young opossums.Neuroscience 5, 1303–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, T. W. &Bell, M. (1979) Ultrastructural features of Merkel cells during murine ontogenetic differentiation.Anatomical Record 193, 495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauna, N. (1966) Fine structure of the receptor organs and its probable functional significance. InTouch Heat and Pain, Ciba Foundation Symposium (edited byDe Reuck, V. &Knight, J.) pp. 81–98. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauna, N. (1976) Morphological basis of sensation in hairy skin.Progress in Brain Research 43, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, E. &Diamond, J. (1977) A quantitative study of the mechanosensory innervation of the salamander skin.Journal of Physiology 264, 295–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Prada, M. &Pletscher, A. (1975) Accumulation of basic drugs in 5-hydroxytryptamine storage organelles of rabbit platelets.European Journal of Pharmacology 32, 179–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, D. D. &Munger, B. L. (1986) The early embryogenesis of papillary (sweat duct) ridges in primate glabrous skin: the dermatotopic map of cutaneous mechanoreceptors and dermatoglyphics.Journal of Comparative Neurology 244, 1–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J., Holmes, M. &Nurse, C. A. (1986) Are Merkel cell-neurite reciprocal synapses involved in the initiation of tactile responses in salamander skin?Journal of Physiology 376, 101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J., Mearow, K. M. &Mills, L. R. (1988) Evidence that the Merkel cell is not the transducer in the mechanosensory Merkel cell-neurite complex.Progress in Brain Research 74, 51–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, K. B. (1977) The ultrastructure of cutaneous Type I mechanoreceptors (Haarscheiben) in cats following denervation.Journal of Comparative Neurology 172, 137–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, K. B., Burgess, P. R. &Kavka-Van Norman, D. (1980) The development of rat Merkel cells.Journal of Comparative Neurology 194, 475–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, K. B., Kavka-Van Norman, D. &Horch, K. (1983) The effects of chronic denervation in Type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors (Haarschieben).Anatomical Record 207, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, H. &Whitear, M. (1978) Observations on Merkel cells in Amphibians.Biology of the Cell 32, 223–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghadially, F. ed. (1982)Ultrastructural Pathology of the Cell and Matrix. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschaldt, K. M. &Vahle-Hinz, C. (1981) Merkel cell receptors: structure and transducer function.Science 214, 183–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschaldt, K. M., Iggo, A. &Young, D. W. (1973) Functional characteristics of mechanoreceptors in sinus hair follicles of the cat.Journal of Physiology 235, 287–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halata, Z. &Munger, B. L. (1980) The sensory innervation of primate eyelid.Anatomical Record 198, 657–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartschuh, W. &Weihe, E. (1979) Fine structural analysis of the synaptic junction of Merkel cell-axon complexes.Journal of Investigative Dermatology 75, 159–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartschuh, W., Weihe, E. &Reinecke, M. (1985) The Merkel Cell. InBiology of the Integument (edited byBereiter-Hahn, J., Matolsky, A. G., &Richards, K. S.) pp. 605–20. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horch, K., Whitehorn, D. &Burgess, P. R. (1974) Impulse generation of Type 1 cutaneous mechanoreceptors.Journal of Neurophysiology 37, 267–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iggo, A. &Andres, K. H. (1982) Morphology of cutaneous receptors.Annual Review of Neuroscience 5, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iggo, A. &Muir, A. R. (1969) The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin.Journal of Physiology 200, 763–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. &Diamond, J. (1984) Temporal and spatial constraints on the collateral sprouting of low-threshold mechanosensory nerves in the skin of rats.Journal of Comparative Neurology 226, 336–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, R. S. &Vallbo, A. B. (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute density of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin.Journal of Physiology 286, 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, R. S. &Vallbo, A. B. (1983) Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand.Trends in Neuroscience 6, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L., Perl, E. &Sedevic, M. J. (1981) Fine structure of myelinated mechanical nociceptor endings in rat hairy skin.Journal of Comparative Neurology 198, 137–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosumi, K., Kurosumi, U. &Inoue, K. (1980) Morphological and morphometric studies with electron microscopy on Merkel cells and associated nerve terminals of normal and denervated skin.Archivum Histologicum Japonicum 42, 243–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosumi, K., Kurosumi, U. &Suzuki, H. (1969) Fine structure of Merkel cells and associated nerve fibers in the epidermis of certain mammalian species.Archivum Histologicum Japonicum 30, 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, W. &Mendelson, M. (1965) Components of receptor adaption in a Pacinian corpuscle.Journal of Physiology 177, 377–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearow, K. M. &Diamond, J. (1988) Merkel cells and the mechanosensitivity of normal and regenerating nerves inXenopus skin.Neuroscience 26, 695–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, F. (1875) Tastzellen und Tastkorperchen bei Hausthieren und Menschen.Archiv Mikroskopische Anatomie 11, 636–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, F. (1880)Uber die Endigungen der sensiblen Nerven in der Haut der Wirbelthiere Rostock: H. Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihara, T., Hashimoto, K., Keiichi, U. &Kumakiri, M. (1973) Specialized junctions between Merkel cell and neurite: an electron microscopic study.Journal of Investigative Dermatology 73, 334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L. R., Nurse, C. N. &Diamond, J. (1989) the neural dependency of Merkel cell development in the rat: the touch domes and footpads contrasted.Developmental Biology 136, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, I., Moll, R. &Franke, W. W. (1984) Identity of Merkel cells in human skin by specific cytokeratin antibodies.Differentiation 28, 136–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, B. L. (1965) The intraepidermal innervation of the snout skin of the opossum: a light and electron microscopic study with observations on the nature of Merkel's Tastzellen.Journal of Cell Biology 26, 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, B. L. (1977) Neural-epithelial interactions in sensory receptors.Journal of Investigative Dermatology 69, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, C. A. &Cooper, E. (1988) Electrophysiological studies on Merkel cells from rat vibrissal mechanoreceptors. InMechanoreceptors — Development, Structure and Function (edited byHnik, P., Soukap, T., Verjsada, R. &Zelena, J.) pp. 189–94. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, C. N., Mearow, K. M., Holmes, M., Visheau, B. &Diamond, J. (1983) Merkel cell distribution in the epidermis as determined by quinacrine fluorescence.Cell and Tissue Research 228, 511–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, C. M., MacIntyre, L. &Diamond, J. (1984a) A quantitative study of the time course of the reduction in Merkel cell number within denervated rat touch domes.Journal of Neuroscience 11, 251–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, C. N., MacIntyre, L. &Diamond, J. (1984b) Reinnervation of the rat touch domes restores the Merkel cell population reduced after denervation.Journal of Neuroscience 13, 563–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochiai, T. &Suzuki, H. (1981) Fine structural and morphometric studies of the Merkel cell during fetal and post-natal development.Journal of Investigative Dermatology 77, 437–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducz, A., Leslie, R., Cooper, E., Turner, C. &Diamond, J. (1977) The Merkel cells and the rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors of the salamander skin.Neuroscience 2, 511–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasche, F., Merot, Y., Carraux, P. &Saurat, J.-H. (1990) Relationship between Merkel cells and nerve endings during embryogenesis in the mouse epidermis.Journal of Investigative Dermatology 95, 247–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilliam, T. (1984) Problems in structural studies of tactile skin receptors. InNeuromuscular Diseases (edited bySerratrice, G.) pp. 309–18. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, W. (1976)Pathology Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxod, R. (1980) Development of Merkel corpuscles in the chicken beak. The problem of their origin and identity.Biology of the Cell 37, 61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. A., Cooper, E. &Diamond, J. (1981) Merkel cells as targets of the mechanosensory nerves in salamander skin.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B211, 455–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. R., Jr (1967) The structure and function of the Haarscheiben.Journal of Comparative Neurology 131, 459–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachibana, T. &Nawa (1980) Merkel cell differentiation in the labial mucous epithelium of the rabbit.Journal of Anatomy 131, 145–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsu, S. Y. H. &Baumann, K. I. (1991) Differential changes in discharge pattern of slowly adapting type I and type II receptors in rat skin-nervein vitro preparation exposed to neomycin or Mg++.Journal of Physiology 455.

  • Winkelman, R. K. &Breathnach, A. S. (1973) The Merkel cell.Journal of Investigative Dermatology 69, 41–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L. (1971) Positional information and pattern formation.Current Topics in Developmental Biology 6, 183–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasargil, G. M., MacIntyre, L., Doucette, R., Visheau, B., Holmes, M. &Diamond, J. (1988) Axonal domains within shared touch domes in the rat: a comparison of their fate during conditions favoring collateral sprouting and following axonal regeneration.Journal of Comparative Neurology 270, 301–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, L.R., Diamond, J. Merkel cells are not the mechanosensory transducers in the touch dome of the rat. J Neurocytol 24, 117–134 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01181555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01181555

Keywords

Navigation