Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive probability and analogy by similarity in inductive logic

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theλ-continuum of inductive methods was derived from an assumption, calledλ-condition, which says that the probability of finding an individual having propertyx j depends only on the number of observed individuals having propertyx j and on the total number of observed individuals. So, according to that assumption, all individuals with properties which are different fromx j have equal weight with respect to that probability and, in particular, it does not matter whether any individual was observed having some propertysimilar tox j (the most complete proof of this result is presented in Carnap, 1980).

The problem thus remained open to find some general condition, weaker than theλ-condition, which would allow for thederivation of probability functions which might be sensitive to similarity. Carnap himself suggested a weakening of theλ-condition which might allow for similarity sensitive probability functions (Carnap, 1980, p. 45) but he did not find the family of probability functions derivable from that principle. The aim of this paper is to present the family of probability functions derivable from Carnap's suggestion and to show how it is derived.

In Section 1 the general problem of analogy by similarity in inductive logic is presented, Section 2 outlines the notation and the conceptual background involved in the proof, Section 3 gives the proof, Section 4 discusses Carnap's principle and the result, Section 5 is a brief review of the solutions which have previously been proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carnap, R.: 1962a,Logical Foundations of Probability, 2nd edition, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1962b,The Continuum of Inductive Methods, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1971, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part I’, in R. Carnap and R. C. Jeffrey (eds.),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 32–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1980, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part II’, in R. C. Jeffrey (ed.),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 8–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, D.: 1979, ‘The Relevance Quotient’,Erkenntnis 14, 149–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, D.: 1983, ‘Analogy by Similarity’,Erkenntnis 20, 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, D.: 1984, ‘Una spiegazione Analogico-Induttiva del problema della perequazione dei dati statistici’, Statistica, n.l, anno XLIV, 61–69.

  • Di Maio, M. C.: 1992, ‘Inductive Logic and the Foundations of Probability Theory. A Revaluation of Carnap's Program’, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio, M.C.: ‘Inductive Logic: Aims and Procedures’, forthcoming on Theoria.

  • Hintikka, J.: 1966, ‘A Two Dimensional Continuum of Inductive Methods’, in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.),Aspects of Inductive Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J. G.: 1964, ‘Carnap's Theory of Probability and Induction’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Cambridge U.P., London, pp. 711–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and Niiniluoto, I.: 1980, ‘An Axiomatic Foundation for the Logic of Inductive Generalization’, in R. C. Jeffrey (ed.),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1984a, ‘Two Types of Inductive Analogy by Similarity’,Erkenntnis 21, 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1984b, ‘Inductive Analogy in Carnapian Spirit’, PSA 1984, Vol. 1, 157–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1988, ‘Inductive Analogy by Similarity and Proximity’, in D. H. Helman (ed.),Analogical Reasoning, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto. I.: 1981, ‘Analogy and Inductive Logic’,Erkenntnis 16, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1988, ‘Analogy and Similarity in Scientific Reasoning’, in H. D. Helman (ed.),Analogical Reasoning, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 271–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 1993, ‘Analogy by Similarity in Hypercarnapian Inductive Logic’, in J. Earman, A. I. Janis, G. J. Massey and N. Rescher (eds.),Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays Concerning the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum, Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W.: 1981, ‘Analogy and Inductive Logic: A Note on Niiniluoto’,Erkenntnis 16, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabell, S.: 1994, ‘The Continuum of Inductive Methods Revisited’, circulated typescript.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Maio, M.C. Predictive probability and analogy by similarity in inductive logic. Erkenntnis 43, 369–394 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135379

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135379

Keywords

Navigation