Abstract
Theλ-continuum of inductive methods was derived from an assumption, calledλ-condition, which says that the probability of finding an individual having propertyx j depends only on the number of observed individuals having propertyx j and on the total number of observed individuals. So, according to that assumption, all individuals with properties which are different fromx j have equal weight with respect to that probability and, in particular, it does not matter whether any individual was observed having some propertysimilar tox j (the most complete proof of this result is presented in Carnap, 1980).
The problem thus remained open to find some general condition, weaker than theλ-condition, which would allow for thederivation of probability functions which might be sensitive to similarity. Carnap himself suggested a weakening of theλ-condition which might allow for similarity sensitive probability functions (Carnap, 1980, p. 45) but he did not find the family of probability functions derivable from that principle. The aim of this paper is to present the family of probability functions derivable from Carnap's suggestion and to show how it is derived.
In Section 1 the general problem of analogy by similarity in inductive logic is presented, Section 2 outlines the notation and the conceptual background involved in the proof, Section 3 gives the proof, Section 4 discusses Carnap's principle and the result, Section 5 is a brief review of the solutions which have previously been proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carnap, R.: 1962a,Logical Foundations of Probability, 2nd edition, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Carnap, R.: 1962b,The Continuum of Inductive Methods, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Carnap, R.: 1971, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part I’, in R. Carnap and R. C. Jeffrey (eds.),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 32–165.
Carnap, R.: 1980, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part II’, in R. C. Jeffrey (ed.),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 8–155.
Costantini, D.: 1979, ‘The Relevance Quotient’,Erkenntnis 14, 149–187.
Costantini, D.: 1983, ‘Analogy by Similarity’,Erkenntnis 20, 103–114.
Costantini, D.: 1984, ‘Una spiegazione Analogico-Induttiva del problema della perequazione dei dati statistici’, Statistica, n.l, anno XLIV, 61–69.
Di Maio, M. C.: 1992, ‘Inductive Logic and the Foundations of Probability Theory. A Revaluation of Carnap's Program’, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton N.J.
Di Maio, M.C.: ‘Inductive Logic: Aims and Procedures’, forthcoming on Theoria.
Hintikka, J.: 1966, ‘A Two Dimensional Continuum of Inductive Methods’, in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.),Aspects of Inductive Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 113–132.
Kemeny, J. G.: 1964, ‘Carnap's Theory of Probability and Induction’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Cambridge U.P., London, pp. 711–738.
Hintikka, J. and Niiniluoto, I.: 1980, ‘An Axiomatic Foundation for the Logic of Inductive Generalization’, in R. C. Jeffrey (ed.),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 157–182.
Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1984a, ‘Two Types of Inductive Analogy by Similarity’,Erkenntnis 21, 63–87.
Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1984b, ‘Inductive Analogy in Carnapian Spirit’, PSA 1984, Vol. 1, 157–67.
Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1988, ‘Inductive Analogy by Similarity and Proximity’, in D. H. Helman (ed.),Analogical Reasoning, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 299–313.
Niiniluoto. I.: 1981, ‘Analogy and Inductive Logic’,Erkenntnis 16, 1–34.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1988, ‘Analogy and Similarity in Scientific Reasoning’, in H. D. Helman (ed.),Analogical Reasoning, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 271–98.
Skyrms, B.: 1993, ‘Analogy by Similarity in Hypercarnapian Inductive Logic’, in J. Earman, A. I. Janis, G. J. Massey and N. Rescher (eds.),Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays Concerning the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum, Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 273–282.
Spohn, W.: 1981, ‘Analogy and Inductive Logic: A Note on Niiniluoto’,Erkenntnis 16, 35–52.
Zabell, S.: 1994, ‘The Continuum of Inductive Methods Revisited’, circulated typescript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Maio, M.C. Predictive probability and analogy by similarity in inductive logic. Erkenntnis 43, 369–394 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135379
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135379