Abstract
The possibility of pronuclear gender determination using morphological criteria only was investigated in 140 two-pronucleate and 39 tripronucleate zygotes. Zygotes were videotaped on different focal points and the positions of the polar bodies, pronuclear diameters, number and distribution of nucleoli, and presence of sperm tail remnants were indicated on diagrams. The three known criteria used for recognition of the paternal pronucleus in rodent zygotes were investigated. These criteria are (a) the presence of sperm tail remnants, (b) an increased pronuclear diameter, and (c) the farthest distance from the second polar body. Sperm tail remnants were observed in only 3/342 (1%) of the pronuclei. Pronuclear diameters and positions of the largest pronuclei did not reveal any trends. Pronuclei of tripronucleate zygotes were frequently smaller than those of two-pronucleate ones. The parental origin of human pronuclei cannot be determined morphologically using standard light optics. Microsurgical removal of paternal pronuclei from polyspermic zygotes should therefore be implemented with caution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Longo FJ: Fertilization. London, Chapman and Hall, 1987
Wright G, Wiker S, Elsner C, Kort H, Massey J, Mitchell D, Toledo A, Cohen J: Observations on the morphology of human zygotes, pronuclei and nucleoli and implications for cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1990;5:109
Soupart P, Strong PA: Ultrastructural observations on human oocytes fertilised in vitro. Fertil Steril 1975;25:11
Longo FJ, Anderson E: Cytological events leading to the formation of the two-cell stage in the rabbit: Association of the maternally and paternally derived genomes. J Ultrastruct Res 1969;29:86
Longo FJ: Fertilization: A comparative ultrastructural review. Biol Reprod 1973;9:149
Chen DY, Longo FJ: Sperm nuclear dispersion coordinate with meiotic maturation in fertilised Spisula solidissima eggs. Dev Biol 1983;99:217
Rawlins R, Binor Z, Radwanska E, Dmowski WP: Microsurgical enucleation of tripronuclear human zygotes. Fertil Steril 1988;50:266
Sathananthan AH: Ultrastructural morphology of fertilization and early cleavage in the human.In In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, A Trounson, C Wood (eds) London, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1984, p 131
Gordon JW, Grunfeld L, Garrisi GJ, Navot D, Laufer N: Successful microsurgical diploidization of tripronuclear human zygotes. Fertil Steril 1989;52:367
Malter HE, Cohen J: Embryonic development following microsurgical repair of polyspermic human zygotes. Fertil Steril 1989;52:373
Cohen J, Wiemer KE, Wright G: Prognostic value of morphological characteristics of cryopreserved embryos: a study using videocinematography. Fertil Steril 1988;19:827
Cohen J, DeVane G, Elsner CW, Kort HI, Massey JB, Norbury S: Cryopreserved zygotes and embryos and endocrinological factors in the replacement cycle. Fertil Steril 1988;50:61
Wiemer KE, Cohen J, Amborski GF, Munuyakani L, Wiker S, Godke RA: In vitro development and implantation of human embryos following culture on fetal uterine fibroblast cells. Hum Reprod 1989;4:595
Cohen J, Inge KL, Suzman M, Wiker S, Wright G: Videocinematography of fresh and cryopreserved embryos: A retrospective analysis of embryonic morphology and implantation. Fertil Steril 1989;51:820
Cohen J, Malter H, Wright G, Kort H, Massey J, Mitchell D: Partial zona dissection of human oocytes when failure of zona pellucida penetration is anticipated. Hum Reprod 1989;4:435
Hunter RHF: Polyspermic fertilization in pigs during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. J Exp Zool 1967;165:451
Poccia D, Krystal G, Nishioka D, Salik J: Control of sperm chromatin structure by egg cytoplasm in the sea urchin.In ICN-UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology: Cell Reproduction XII, ER Dirksen, DM Prescott, CF Fox (eds). New York, Academic Press, p 197
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiker, S., Malter, H., Wright, G. et al. Recognition of paternal pronuclei in human zygotes. J Assist Reprod Genet 7, 33–37 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01133881
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01133881