Skip to main content
Log in

Critical test of PM3 calculated gas-phase acidities

  • Published:
Theoretica chimica acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Gas-phase acidities have been calculated for 175 compounds using the PM3 semiempirical molecular orbital model. With some exceptions, PM3 seems to be a useful tool for the investigation of gas-phase acidities. The main problems encountered involve two rather different classes of acids: one which generates small anions (e.g., halide ions, hydride ion, etc.), in which the charge is localized on one atom, and, a second, represented by anions that contain bulky electron acceptor substituents characterized by an extensive negative charge delocalization. In some cases (anilines, amides, alcohols, and phenols) the average error in predicted gas-phase acidity can be significantly reduced by employing an empirically derived correction.

Comparison with AM1 results shows that both methods are of roughly equal quality with the exception of hypervalent molecules where PM3 is better (averaged unsigned errors are 11.8 and 17.0 kcal/mol for PM3 and AM1, respectively).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schlyer, PRv, Pople JA (1986)Ab Initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bingham RC, Dewar MJS, Loo DH (1975) J Am Chem Soc 97:1285

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dewar MJS, Thiel W (1977) J Am Chem Soc 99:4899

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dewar MJS, Zoebisch EG, Healy EF, Stewart JJP (1985) J Am Chem Soc 107:3902

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart JJP (1989) J Comput Chem 10:209

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dewar MJS, Dieter KM (1986) J Am Chem Soc 108:8075 and references therein

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koppel IA, Mölder UH, Palm VA (1985) Org React (Tartu) 21:3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kollmar H (1978) J Am Chem Soc 100:2665

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bartmess JE, Burnham RD (1984) J Org Chem 49:1382

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bartmess JE, Caldwell G, Rozeboom D (1983) J Am Chem Soc 105:340

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kass SR (1990) J Comp Chem 11:94

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dewar MJS, Fox MA, Nelson DJ (1980) J Organomet Chem 185:157

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon MS, Davis LP, Burggaf LF, Damrauer M (1986) J Am Chem Soc 108:7889

    Google Scholar 

  14. Olivella S, Urpi F, Vilarrasa J (1984) J Comput Chem 5:230

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siggel MR, Thomas TD, Saethre LJ (1988) J Am Chem Soc 110:91

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koppel IA, Comisarow MB (1980) Org React (Tartu) 17:498

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koppel IA, Mölder UH (1981) Org React (Tartu) 18:42

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart JJP (1989) J Comput Chem 10:221

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lias SG, Bartmess JE, Liebman JF, Holmes JL, Levin RD, Mallard WG (1988) J Phys Chem Ref Data 17, Suppl No. 1

  20. Stewart JJP (1983) MOPAC Program Package — QPCE 455

  21. Thiel W, Voityuk AA (1992) Theor Chim Acta 81:391

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burk, P., Koppel, I.A. Critical test of PM3 calculated gas-phase acidities. Theoret. Chim. Acta 86, 417–427 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01122432

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01122432

Key words

Navigation