Abstract
Data on student achievement gain in a large urban school district during the 1984–85 school year were analyzed to identify schools with achievement consistently higher or lower than schools with similar student and school characteristics. Before calculating gain scores, students were grouped with others of the same sex, ethnicity, initial grade level, and initial achievement level. After residuals for students who were above or below similar students were summed and averaged for reading and math at each grade, school-level regression analysis was used to further control for student and school characteristics. Results indicated that schools with reading gains one standard deviation above the mean had average raw scores less than two items higher than the district average on the sixty-item reading test, while schools with math gains this large had raw scores little more than one item higher than the average on the 44-item math test. In addition, examination of data on schools with residual (combined) reading and math gain scores 1.5 or more standard deviations above the average showed that after taking account of student background information and salient school characteristics, only one elementary school among 173 and no secondary school among 71 had unusually high achievement scores. Implications are discussed regarding efforts to identify and reward “meritorious” schools which allegedly have improved achievement more than other similar schools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acton, F.S. (1959).Analysis of Straight-Line Data. New York: Wiley.
Denton, W.T. (1986). School achievement test results as a basis for teacher bonuses. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Eubanks, E.E., and Levine, D.U. (1983). A first look at effective school projects in Milwaukee and New York.Phi Delta Kappan 64 (10): 697–702.
Good, T.L., and Brophy, J.E. (1986). School effects. In Merlin C. Wittrock (ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching pp. 570–602. New York: Macmillan.
Klitgaard, R.E., and Hall, G.R. (1974). Are there unusually effective schools?Journal of Human Resources (1985). 74: 90–106.
Levine, D.U., and Eubanks, E.E. (1985). Long-term relationships between socioeconomic status, race and achievement in a big-city school district. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Levine, D.U., Keeny, J., Kukuk, C., Fort, B.O., Mares, K.R., and Stephenson, R.S. (1979). Concentrated poverty and reading achievement in seven big cities.The Urban Review 11(2): 63–80.
Medley, D.M., and Lara, A.V. (1984). Effective teacher behavior as a function of pupil ability and subject taught. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Neff, M.J. Attitudes of school personnel toward a meritorious school incentive program in relation to student achievement, attendance, and dropout rate. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, 1986.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., and Ouston, J. (1979).Fifteen Thousand Hours. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stephenson, R.S. (1985). The Dade County merit school selection procedures: data, measurement, statistical, and outcome considerations. Paper prepared for the Florida State Department of Education.
Stephenson, R.S. (1986). Is the school an appropriate unit of merit? Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephenson, R.S., Levine, D.U. Are effective or meritorious schools meretricious?. Urban Rev 19, 25–34 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108422
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108422