Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in preference

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A basic framework for studies of changes in preference is introduced, and four types of changes in preference are identified.Revision by a sentence such as ‘A is better thanB’ means that a preference forA overB is acquired. The result ofcontraction by ‘A is better thanB’ is that the subject no longer holdsA to be better thanB. Inaddition andsubtraction, an alternative is added to, or subtracted from, respectively, the set of alternatives that are under consideration. Formal models of these four types of change are introduced, and they are shown to satisfy plausible postulates for rational changes in preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Anaïs Cadilhac, Nicholas Asher, … Farah Benamara

References

  • Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D.: 1985, ‘On the logic of theory change: Partial meet functions for contraction and revision’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, A.: 1991, ‘Theory contraction through base contraction’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 20, 175–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, A. and Hansson, S.O.: 1993, ‘A survey of multiple contraction’,Journal of Logic, Language and Information, in press.

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1988,Knowledge in Flux. Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, S.: 1957,On the Logic of ‘Better’, Lund: Library of Theoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O.: 1989a, ‘New operators for theory change’Theoria 55, 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O.: 1989b, ‘A new semantical approach to the logic of preference’,Erkenntnis 31, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O.: 1989c ‘Preference-based deontic logic (PDL)’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 19, 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O.: 1992, ‘Similarity semantics and minimal changes of belief’,Erkenntnis 37, 401–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O. 1993a, ‘Theory contraction and base contraction unified’,Journal of Symbolic Logic, in press.

  • Hansson, S.O. 1993b, ‘Reversing the Levi identity’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 22, 637–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O.: 1993c, ‘Money-pumps, self-torturers and the demons of real life’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy, in press.

  • Levi, I.: 1991,The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing. Changing Beliefs Through Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973a,Counterfactuals, Cambridge, U.S.A.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973b, ‘Causation’,Journal of Philosophy 70, 556–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1981, ‘Ordering semantics and premise semantics for counterfactuals’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T.: 1988, ‘First-order logics for comparative similarity’,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29, 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, S.O. Changes in preference. Theor Decis 38, 1–28 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083166

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083166

Keywords

Navigation