Skip to main content
Log in

The concept of scripts in understanding stories

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subjects listened to a series of stories based on everyday activities, such as taking a shower, which in Schank's (1975a,b) terminology have familiar scripts. Script implications, like getting undressed, either were made explicit in the story or were left implicit. Unpredictable script variables, such as the temperature of the water, were specified. On an immediate sentence recognition test, subjects detected changes in the script variables more accurately than changes in the explicitness of the script implications. After a delay, test sentences with added or deleted script implications were falsely recognized and were judged to be as familiar as test sentences with no changes. The results supported the hypothesis that the memory representation for stories includes relevant script knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baggett, P. (1975). Memory for explicit and implicit information in picture stories.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 14:538–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, J. R. (1973). The role of comprehension in remembering sentences.Cogn. Psychol. 4:229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., and Johnson, M. K. (1973). Consideration of some problems of comprehension. In Chase, W. G. (ed.).Visual Information Processing, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., and Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach.Cogn. Psychol. 3:193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charniak, E. (1975) Organization and inference in a frame-like system of common sense knowledge. In proceedings ofTheoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge.

  • Fredericksen, C. H. (1975). Acquisition of semantic information from discourse: Effects of repeated exposures.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 14:158–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., and Solomon, S. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences.J. Exp. Psychol. 98:203–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1974).The Representation of Meaning in Memory, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., and Carter, A. Y. (1973). Semantic and constructive aspects of sentence memory in children.Dev. Psychol. 9:109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Percept. Psychophys. 2:437–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1975a). The structure of episodes in memory. In Bobrow, D. G., and Collins, A. M. (eds.),Representation and Understanding, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1975b). SAM—A story understander. Yale A. I. Project Research Report No. 43.

  • Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. P. (1975). Scripts, plans, and knowledge. Paper presented at the 4th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Tbilisi, USSR, August.

  • Schmidt, C. F. (1976). Understanding human action: Recognizing the plans and motives of other persons. In Carroll, J., and Payne, J. (eds.),Cognition and Social Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum Press, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbs, R.W., Tenney, Y.J. The concept of scripts in understanding stories. J Psycholinguist Res 9, 275–284 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067242

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067242

Keywords

Navigation