Abstract
One aspect of the phenomenon of coherence in conversational discourse was addressed in the present study: sequentiality of speech acts. Several models of discourse structure have postulated sequencing rules between speech acts in conversations, but these efforts have been hampered by the lack of an efficient empirical method that can characterize a large body of language data. The lag sequential technique is proposed here as a tool that can be used to abstract a “grammar” of speech act contingency from spoken discourse. Derived patterns of discourse between female adults and preschool children confirmed expectations that most discourse is based upon three fundamental speech act pairings: question-answer, statement-reply, and directive-acknowledgment. It was also found that interlocutor differences in status, knowledge, and conversational ability affected the structure of the discourse in predictable ways.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agar, M., & Hobbs, J.R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interviews.Discourse Processes,5, 1–32.
Allison, P.D., & Liker, J.K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman.Psychological Bulletin,91, 393–403.
Austin, J.L. (1962).How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bakeman, R. (1979).Analyzing event sequence data: Computer programs ESEQ and ELAG (Tech. Rep. 11). Athens: Georgia State University, Social Development Laboratory. (Revised 1982)
Bales, R.F. (1950).Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Coulthard, R.M. (1977).An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language development.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,3, 343–350.
Dore, J. (1975). Holophrases, speech acts and language universals.Journal of Child Language,2, 21–40.
Dore, J. (1977a). Children's illocutionary acts. In R. Freedle (Ed.),Discourse production and comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Dore, J. (1977b). “Oh them sheriff”: A pragmatic analysis of children's responses to questions. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.),Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.
Dore, J., Gearhart, M., & Newman, D. (1978). The structure of nursery school conversation. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.),Children's language (Vol. 1). New York: Gardner Press.
Ervin-Tripp, S., & Miller, W. (1977). Early discourse: Some questions about questions. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.),Interaction, conversation, and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
Fine, J. (1978). Conversation, cohesive and thematic patterning in children's dialogues.Discourse Processes,1, 247–266.
Gordon, D., & Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational postulates. InPapers from the Seventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, 63–84.
Gottman, J.M. (1979).Marital interactions: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hinds, J. (1976).Aspects of Japanese discourse structure. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Hobbs, J.R. (1979). Coherence and coreference.Cognitive Science,3, 67–90.
Holtzman, M. (1972). The use of interrogative forms in the verbal interaction of three mothers and their children.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,1, 311–336.
Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1983). Speech act structure in conversation: Rational aspects of pragmatic coherence. In: R. T. Craig & K. Tracy (Eds.),Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy (pp. 47–66). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977).Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Martin, J.A., Maccoby, E.E., Baran, K.W., & Jacklin, C.N. (1981). Sequential analysis of mother-child interaction at 18months: A comparison of microanalytic methods.Developmental Psychology,17, 146–157.
Mishler, E.G. (1975a). Studies in dialogue and discourse: An exponential law of successive questioning.Language in Society,4, 31–51.
Mishler, E.G. (1975b). Studies in dialogue and discourse: II. Types of discourse initiated by and sustained through questioning.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,4, 99–121.
Mishler, E.G. (1978). Studies in dialogue and discourse: III. Utterance structure and utterance function in interrogative sequences.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,7, 279–305.
Reichman, R. (1981).Plain speaking: A theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse (Tech. Rep. 4681). Boston: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.
Sackett, G.P. (1978). Measurement in observational research. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.),Observing behavior, Vol. II: Data collection and analysis methods. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Sackett, G.P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. Osofsky (Ed.),Handbook of infant development. New York: Wiley.
Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.Language,50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E.A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings.Semiotica,8, 289–327.
Searle, J.R. (1969).Speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Seminar Press.
Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, R.M. (1975).Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
Stech, E.L. (1975). Sequential structure in human social communication.Human Communication Research,1, 168–179.
Stech, E.L. (1979). A grammar of conversation with a quantitative empirical test.Human Communication Research,5, 158–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jose, P.E. Sequentiality of speech acts in conversational structure. J Psycholinguist Res 17, 65–88 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067181
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067181