Skip to main content
Log in

Sequentiality of speech acts in conversational structure

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One aspect of the phenomenon of coherence in conversational discourse was addressed in the present study: sequentiality of speech acts. Several models of discourse structure have postulated sequencing rules between speech acts in conversations, but these efforts have been hampered by the lack of an efficient empirical method that can characterize a large body of language data. The lag sequential technique is proposed here as a tool that can be used to abstract a “grammar” of speech act contingency from spoken discourse. Derived patterns of discourse between female adults and preschool children confirmed expectations that most discourse is based upon three fundamental speech act pairings: question-answer, statement-reply, and directive-acknowledgment. It was also found that interlocutor differences in status, knowledge, and conversational ability affected the structure of the discourse in predictable ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agar, M., & Hobbs, J.R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interviews.Discourse Processes,5, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.D., & Liker, J.K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman.Psychological Bulletin,91, 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1962).How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R. (1979).Analyzing event sequence data: Computer programs ESEQ and ELAG (Tech. Rep. 11). Athens: Georgia State University, Social Development Laboratory. (Revised 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F. (1950).Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, R.M. (1977).An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language development.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,3, 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, J. (1975). Holophrases, speech acts and language universals.Journal of Child Language,2, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, J. (1977a). Children's illocutionary acts. In R. Freedle (Ed.),Discourse production and comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, J. (1977b). “Oh them sheriff”: A pragmatic analysis of children's responses to questions. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.),Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, J., Gearhart, M., & Newman, D. (1978). The structure of nursery school conversation. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.),Children's language (Vol. 1). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin-Tripp, S., & Miller, W. (1977). Early discourse: Some questions about questions. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.),Interaction, conversation, and the development of language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, J. (1978). Conversation, cohesive and thematic patterning in children's dialogues.Discourse Processes,1, 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., & Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational postulates. InPapers from the Seventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, 63–84.

  • Gottman, J.M. (1979).Marital interactions: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, J. (1976).Aspects of Japanese discourse structure. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.R. (1979). Coherence and coreference.Cognitive Science,3, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman, M. (1972). The use of interrogative forms in the verbal interaction of three mothers and their children.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,1, 311–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1983). Speech act structure in conversation: Rational aspects of pragmatic coherence. In: R. T. Craig & K. Tracy (Eds.),Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy (pp. 47–66). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977).Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.A., Maccoby, E.E., Baran, K.W., & Jacklin, C.N. (1981). Sequential analysis of mother-child interaction at 18months: A comparison of microanalytic methods.Developmental Psychology,17, 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E.G. (1975a). Studies in dialogue and discourse: An exponential law of successive questioning.Language in Society,4, 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E.G. (1975b). Studies in dialogue and discourse: II. Types of discourse initiated by and sustained through questioning.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,4, 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E.G. (1978). Studies in dialogue and discourse: III. Utterance structure and utterance function in interrogative sequences.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,7, 279–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, R. (1981).Plain speaking: A theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse (Tech. Rep. 4681). Boston: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, G.P. (1978). Measurement in observational research. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.),Observing behavior, Vol. II: Data collection and analysis methods. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, G.P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. Osofsky (Ed.),Handbook of infant development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.Language,50, 696–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E.A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings.Semiotica,8, 289–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1969).Speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, R.M. (1975).Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stech, E.L. (1975). Sequential structure in human social communication.Human Communication Research,1, 168–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stech, E.L. (1979). A grammar of conversation with a quantitative empirical test.Human Communication Research,5, 158–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jose, P.E. Sequentiality of speech acts in conversational structure. J Psycholinguist Res 17, 65–88 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067181

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067181

Keywords

Navigation