Skip to main content
Log in

Scale, scope, and regulation in the Texas gas transmission industry

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes and analyzes the Texas Railroad Commission's regulatory policies for the intrastate gas transmission industry, paying special attention to the impact of direct utility competition on scale and scope economies. Our econometric results suggest that most firms operate at substantial decreasing returns to scale, and the largest firms suffer the biggest diseconomies of scale. There are economies of scope between types of gas sales, but diseconomies of scope when a pipeline combines transportation with multiple categories of gas sales. These results suggest that the Texas Railroad Commission's liberal policies on entry and private contracting have not resulted in inefficient entry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Alan D., and Mary Beth Walker. 1983.A Description of the Texas Natural Gas Transmission Industry During the 1970's. Houston: Energy Planning, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., J. Panzar, and R. Willig. 1982.Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M.E., and S.C. Littlechild. 1989. “The Regulation of Privatized Monopolies in the United Kingdom.”Rand Journal of Economics 20(No.3 Autumn):454–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreaux, D., and R. Ekelund. 1988. “Regulation as an Exogenous Response to Market Failure: A Neo-Schumpeterian Response.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics:537–54.

  • Broadman, H., and J.P. Kalt. 1989. “How Natural is Monopoly? The Case of Bypass in Natural Gas Distribution Markets,”Yale Journal on Regulation 6:181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, L.R., D. Jorgensen, and L.J. Lau. 1973. ”Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers,”Review of Economics and Statistics 55:28–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, Robert C. 1959.James Stephen Hogg: A Biography. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, R.W. 1991.After the Breakup: US. Telecommunications in a More Competitive Era. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. M. 1947. “Recollections of the Establishment of the Texas Railroad Commission.”Southwest Historical Quarterly50:478–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M.A. (ed.). 1991.Competition and the Regulation of Utilities. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., and C. Rowley. 1988. “Toward a Public Choice Theory of Monopoly Regulation,”Public Choice 51:49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., and M. Zupan. 1991. “Franchise Bidding for Public Utilities Revisited,” inCrew: 173–88.

  • Demsetz, H. 1968. “Why Regulate Utilities?,”Journal of Law and Economics 11 (No.1, April):55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, George W., C. Wade Clifton and John J. Wieferman. 1981. “A Study of the Economic Characteristics of Transactions Among Gas Pipeline Companies in Texas.” Austin: Southwest Econometrics, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, R., and R. Higgins. 1982. “Capital Fixity, Innovations, and Long-Term Contracting: An Intertemporal Economic Theory of Regulation,”American Economic Review 72 (No. 1, March):32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellig, J., and J. High. 1992. “Social Contracts and Pipe Dreams,”Contemporary Policy Issues. Vol. 10, January):39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, V.P. 1976. “Regulation and Administered Contracts,”Bell Journal of Economics 7 (2 Autumn):426–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, T. W. 1986. “Competition vs. Franchise Monopoly in Cable Television,” Contemporary Policy Issues 4 (April):80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, T. W. 1985. “Private Contracting vs. Public Regulation as a Solution to the Natural Monopoly Problem,” edited by R. Poole,Unnatural Monopolies. Lexington: Lexington Books, 71–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A.H. 1970.The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions, Vol. I. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J.P. 1987. “Prepared Rebuttal Testimony of Joseph P. Kalt,” FERC Docket CP85-437, EX. MP-69.

  • Kalt, J.P., and F.C. Schuller. 1987.Drawing the Line on Natural Gas Regulation. New York: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, J. Rodney. 1986. “Regulatory Reform of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines,”Contemporary Policy Issues 4:93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathios, A. D., and R.P. Rogers. 1989. “The Impactof Alternative Forms of State Regulation of AT&T on Direct-Dial, Long-Distance Telephone Rates,“Rand Journal of Economics 20(3, Autumn):437–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (edited by). 1975.Promoting Competition in Regulated Industries. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, W.J. 1986.Direct Electric Utility Competition. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, W.J. 1985. “Estimates of the Price Effect of Competition: The Case of Electricity,”Resources and Energy 7:325–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, W.J. 1978. “The Effect of Competition on Capacity Utilization in the Electric Utility Industry, ”Economic Inquiry 16:(2, April):237–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, W.J. 1977. “An Assessment of X-Efficiency Gained Through Competition,”Review of Economics and Statistics 59(No.1, February): 105–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, W J. 1975. “A Reexamination of the Monopoly Market Structure for Electric Utilities,” in Phillips: 175–200.

  • Prindle, David F. 1981.Petroleum Politics and the Texas Railroad Commission. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railroad Commission of Texas, Transportation/Gas Utilities Division. 1990. Gas Utilities Annual Report, Fiscal Year. Austin.

  • Railroad Commission of Texas, Oil and Gas Division. 1989.Statewide Rules for Oil, Gas and Geothermal Operations. Austin.

  • Railroad Commission of Texas, Transportation/Gas Utilities Division. 1990.Gas Pipeline Safety Rules. Austin.

  • Sunset Advisory Commission (State of Texas). 1982. “Staff report on the Railroad Commission of Texas.”

  • Texas pipeline companies, annual reports to the Transportation/Gas Utilities Division. 1989 and 1990.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellig, J., Giberson, M. Scale, scope, and regulation in the Texas gas transmission industry. J Regul Econ 5, 79–90 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066315

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066315

Keywords

Navigation