Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spectral characteristics and synchrony in primary auditory-nerve fibers in response to pure-tone acoustic stimuli

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under pure-tone stimulation, the spectrum of the period histogram recorded from primary auditory-nerve fibers at low and medium frequencies contains components at DC, at the applied tone frequency (the fundamental), and at a small number of harmonics of the tone frequency. The magnitudes and phases of these spectral components are examined. The spectral magnitudes of the fundamental and various harmonic components generally bear a fixed proportionality to each other over a broad range of signal conditions and nerve-fiber characteristics. This implies that the shape of the underlying rectified wave remains essentially unchanged over a broad range of stimulus intensities. For high-frequency stimuli, the fundamental and harmonic components are substantially attenuated. We provide a theoretical basis for the decrease of the spectralcomponent magnitudes with increasing harmonic number. For low-frequency pure-tone signals, the decrease is caused principally by the uncertainty in the position of neural-event occurrences within the half-wave-rectified period histogram. The lower the stimulus frequency, the greater this time uncertainty and therefore the lower the frequency at which the spectral components begin to diminish. For high-frequency pure-tone signals, on the other hand, the decrease is caused principally by the frequency rolloff associated with nervespike time jitter (it is then called loss of phase locking or loss of synchrony). Since some of this jitter arises from noise in the auditory nerve, it can be minimized by using peak detection rather than level detection. Using a specially designed microcomputer that measures the times at which the peaks of the action potentials occur, we have demonstrated the presence of phase locking to tone frequencies as high as 18 kHz. The traditional view that phase locking is always lost above 6 kHz is clearly not valid. This indicates that the placeversus-periodicity dichotomy in auditory theory requires reexaraination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Abeles, Quantification, smoothing, and confidence limits for single-units' histograms,J. Neurosci. Meth. 5:317–325 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. B. Allen, Magnitude and phase-frequency response to single tones in the auditory nerve,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:2071–2092 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. J. Andersen, Quantitative model for the effects of stimulus frequency on synchronization of auditory nerve discharges,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:361–364 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. Anderson, J. E. Rose, J. E. Hind, and J. F. Brugge, Temporal position of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers within the cycle of a sine-wave stimulus: Frequency and intensity effects,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:1131–1139 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. F. Evans, The frequency response and other properties of single fibers in the guinea-pig cochlear nerve,J. Physiol. (London)226:263–287 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. F. Evans, Cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus, inHandbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. V/2,Auditory System, W. D. Keidel and W. D. Neff, eds. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975), pp. 1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Galambos and H. Davis, The response of single auditory-nerve fibers to acoustic stimulation,J. Neurophysiol. 6:39–57 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. L. Gerstein and N. Y.-S. Kiang, An approach to the quantitative analysis of electrophysiological data from single neurons,Biophys. J. 1:15–28 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Glaser and D. J. Ruchkin,Principles of Neurobiological Signal Analysis (Academic Press, New York, 1976), pp. 291–371.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Goldberg and P. B. Brown, Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: Some physiological mechanisms of sound localization,J. Neurophysiol. 32:613–636 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. H. Johnson, The relationship of post-stimulus time and interval histograms to the timing characteristics of spike trains,Biophys. J. 22:413–430 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. H. Johnson, The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in response of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1115–1122 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Katsuki, T., Sumi, H. Uchiyama, and T. Watanabe, Electric responses of auditory neurones in cat to sound stimulation,J. Neurophysiol. 21:569–588 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. M. Khanna and M. C. Teich, Spectral characteristics of the responses of primary auditory-nerve fibers to amplitude-modulated signals,Hearing Res. 39:143–158 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. M. Khanna and M. C. Teich, Spectral characteristics of the responses of primary auditory-nerve fibers to frequency-modulated signals,Hearing Res. 39:159–176 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. M. Khanna, M. Ulfendahl, and Å. Flock, Waveforms and spectra of cellular vibrations in the organ of Corti,Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. (Stockholm)467:189–193 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Y.-S. Kiang, Peripheral neural processing of auditory information, inHandbook of Physiology: The Nervous System, Vol. 3,Sensory Processes, I. Darian Smith, ed. (American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 1984), pp. 639–674.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Y.-S. Kiang, E. C. Moxon, and R. A. Levine, Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas, inSensorineural Hearing Los, G. E. W. Wolstenholme and J. Knight, eds. (Churchill, London, 1970), pp. 241–273.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Y.-S. Kiang, T. Watanabe, E. C. Thomas, and L. F. Clark, Stimulus coding in the cat's auditory nerve,Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 71:1009–1026 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Y.-S. Kiang, T. Watanabe, E. C. Thomas, and L. F. Clark,Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. O. Kim, C. E. Molnar, and J. W. Matthews, Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1704–1721 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. C. Liberman, Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:442–455 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. M. Littlefield, Investigation of the linear-range of the peripheral auditory system, Sc.D. thesis, Washington University (1973) (Available from University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan, No. 74-13808).

  24. W. M. Littlefield, R. R. Pfeiffer, and C. E. Molnar, Modulation index as a response criterion for discharge activity,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51:93 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Longtin, A. Bulsara, and F. Moss, Time-interval sequences in bistable systems and the noise-induced transmission of information by sensory neurons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 67:656–659 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, Doubly stochastic Poisson point process driven by fractal shot noise,Phys. Rev. A 43:4192–4215 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, Auditory-nerve action potentials form a nonrenewal point process over short as well as long time scales,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:803–806 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. R. Pfeiffer and C. E. Molnar, Cochlear nerve fiber discharge patterns: Relationship to the cochlear microphonic,Science 167:1614–1616 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. E. Rose, J. F. Brugge, D. J. Anderson, and J. E. Hind, Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey,J. Neurophysiol. 30:769–793 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. E. Rose, J. F. Brugge, D. J. Anderson, and J. E. Hind, Patterns of activity in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey, inHearing Mechanisms in Vertebrates, A. V. S. deReuck and J. Knight, eds. (Little Brown, Boston, Massachusetts, 1968), pp. 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. E. Rose, J. E. Hind, D. J. Anderson, and J. F. Brugge, Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey,J. Neurophysiol. 34:685–699 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. E. Sullivan and M. Konishi, Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl,J. Neurosci. 4:1787–1799 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  33. I. Tasaki, Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig,J, Neurophysiol. 17:97–122 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. C. Teich, Fractal character of the auditory neural spike train,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:150–160 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. C. Teich, Fractal neuronal firing patterns, inSingle Neuron Computation, T. McKenna, J. Davis, and S. F. Zornetzer, eds. (Academic Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1992), Chapter 22, pp. 589–625.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. C. Teich and S. M. Khanna, Pulse-number distribution for the neural spike train in the cat's auditory nerve,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:1110–1128 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. C. Teich and S. M. Khanna, Loss of synchrony in auditory nerve fibers, inAbstracts of the Twelfth Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Feb. 5–9, 1989, Abstract No. 138, p. 122.

  38. M. C. Teich, S. E. Keilson, and S. M. Khanna, Rectification models in cochlear transduction,Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. (Stockholm)467:235–240 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. C. Teich, S. E. Keilson; and S. M. Khanna, Models of nonlinear vibration. II. Oscillator with bilinear stiffness,Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. (Stockholm)467:249–256 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. C. Teich, S. M. Khanna, and S. E. Keilson, Nonlinear dynamics of cellular vibrations in the organ of Corti,Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. (Stockholm)467:265–279 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. C. Teich, R. G. Turcott, and S. B. Lowen, The fractal doubly stochastic Poisson point process as a model for the cochlear neural spike train, inThe Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing, P. Dallos, C. D. Geisler, J. W. Matthews, M. A. Ruggero, and C. R. Steele, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990), pp. 354–361.

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. C. Teich, D. H. Johnson, A. R. Kumar, and R. G. Turcott, Rate fluctuations and fractional power-law noise recorded from cells in the lower auditory pathway of the cat,Hearing Res. 46:41–52 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Columbia University, 10027, New York, New York

    Malvin C. Teich

  2. Fowler Memorial Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, Columbia College of Physicians & Surgeons, 10032, New York, New York

    Shyam M. Khanna

  3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, 10027, New York, New York

    Patrick C. Guiney

Authors
  1. Malvin C. Teich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shyam M. Khanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick C. Guiney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teich, M.C., Khanna, S.M. & Guiney, P.C. Spectral characteristics and synchrony in primary auditory-nerve fibers in response to pure-tone acoustic stimuli. J Stat Phys 70, 257–279 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053967

Key words

Search

Navigation