Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Open questions in contemporary Soviet philosophy of law and state

  • Published:
Studies in Soviet Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. F. Engels:Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staates. Berlin Ost, 1955.

  2. J. Stalin: ‘Ob osnovach leninizma’. In:Sočinenija, vol. VI, 114.

  3. Stanislaw Ehrlich:Teoria panstwa i prawa. Warsaw, 1957, p. 55.

  4. Izvestija, Moscow, May 17, 1964. Further,Sovetskaja Belorussija, Minsk, May 19, 1964.

  5. Mirko Perovič:Socijalizam i odumiranje države. Belgrade, 1959.

  6. C. Stepanjan: ‘O zakonomernostjach pererastanija socializma v kommunizm’.Kommunist, 1959, 14, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. M. Karapetjan, V. I. Razin: ‘Ob issledovanii razvitija socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti’.VF 1961, 6, 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Stalin: ‘Die Ergebnisse des ersten Fünfjahresplanes. Bericht auf dem vereinigten Plenum des ZK der KPdSU (B) am 7. Januar 1933’. In:Fragen des Leninismus. M. 1948, 477.

  10. ‘Über die Kontrollziffern für die Entwicklung der Volkswirtschaft der UdSSR in den Jahren 1959 bis 1965. Rede des Genossen N. S. Chruščev auf dem XXI. Parteitag der KPdSU am 27. Januar 1959’.Neues Deutschland. Berlin Ost, 29–30. 1. 1959, special supplement.

  11. P. Romaškin: ‘Socialističeskoe gosudarstvo i kommunističeskoe samoupravlenie’.Partijnaja Žizn', M. 1961, 8, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Petrov, G. I. Petrov: ‘Nekotorye voprosy razvitija sovetskoj gosudarstvennosti’. In:Izvestija vysšich učebnych zavedenij. Pravovedenie. M. 1959, 4, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See his work cited above.

  14. For the Soviet critique, see: B. S. Mankovskij: ‘O povyšenii roli obščestvennych organizacii v stroitel'stve kommunizma’. In:Ot socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti k kommunističeskomu obščestvennomu samoupravleniju. M. 1961, 125–129.

  15. See: A. D. Denisov: ‘O sootnošenii gosudarstva i obščestva v perechodnyj ot kapitalizma k kommunizmu period’.Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo (henceforthSGiP), 1960, 4, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Gončarov: ‘O praktike vovlečenija obščestvennosti v rabotu leningradskogo rajonnogo soveta g. Moskvy’. In:Ot socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti, 294.

  17. Program of the CPSU, part 2, chapter III/1. Also, Karapetjan-Razin,loc. cit.

  18. Fedoseev: ‘Za dal'nejšij rascvet socialističeskoj demokratii’. In:Ot socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti, 8.

  19. V. Ja. El'meev: ‘Razvitie form organizacii obščestva v processe perechoda k kommunizmu’.Vestnik LGU, no 11.Serija Ekonomiki, Filosofii i Prava. 1964, 2, 48–56. Here p. 53. However, it might be mentioned that some theoreticians maintain that in full communism the governing of persons will continue, while others are of the opinion that it will be limited to things and production. See El'meev,loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ‘XXIII. s'ezd KPSS i voprosy sovetskogo socialističeskogo gosudarstva i prava’. Leading article by the editors.SGiP, 1966, 5, 3–11.

  21. Especially the small thefts of social property and rowdyism. In 1963, twenty percent of all registered crimes against the state in the RSFSR were thefts of social property, not even counting the smaller ones which were handled by the social courts. See: V. I. Laputin: ‘Aktual'nye voprosy ukreplenija socialističeskogo pravoporjadka’. SGiP, 1964, 61, 3–11. Also in Czechoslovakia:Rudé Právo, Prague, Sept. 26, 1964, 2. Because of the fast spread of rowdyism it was declared as a “dangerous punishable action” in decree no. 17 of the plenary session of the highest court of the USSR on December 22, 1964. See:Sovetskaja Justicija. M. 1965, 3, 27–28. In 1961 in Poland, 30,8 percent of all convictions concerned alcoholism or rowdyism, which stand in a close relationship. See:Glos pracy. Warsaw, April 12, 1962, 1.

  22. El'meev,op. cit., p. 52. The leading role of the party must be maintained, but it is realized without dictatorship. See: F. Burlackij: ‘Voprosy gosudarstva v proekte Programmy KPSS’.Kommunist, 1961, 13, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ju. F. Buchalov, I. H. Kulikov, M. F. Partolin: ‘O razvitii nadstrojki sovetskogo obščestva v period razvernutogo stroiltel'stva kommunizma’.FN, 1961, 2, 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  24. According to Marxism-Leninism politics is the regulation of the relations of classes between each other and between them and the state. It is thus a tool of the class struggle. Internal politics takes in the class struggle within the state; foreign politics, on the other hand, deals with it in the international sphere. In the classless society politics cannot exist. See: Laszlo Revesz:Ideologie und Praxis in der sowjetischen Innen- und Aussenpolitik. Mainz, 1965, p. 44.

  25. P. E. Nedbajlo, R. V. Beršeda: ‘Primenenie pravovych norm kollektivami i samodejatel'nymi organizacijami sovetskich graždan’.SGiP, 1961, 5, 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid. and V. V. Nikolaev: ‘O putjach razvitija sovetskoj socialističkoj gosudarstvennosti v kommunističeskoe obščestvennoe samoupravlenie’. In:Ot socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti, p. 18. See especially: László Révész: ‘Recht und Sozialnorm’.SST, V, 1/2 (1965) 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nilokaev,op cit., ‘ p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. I. P. Il'inskij: ‘Razvitie gosudarstvennosti v evropejskich socialističeskich stranach’.VF 1964, 10, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jerzy Kowalski: ‘Pryzycnek do rozwažan’ nad pojeciem prawa’.Panstwo i prawo, Warsaw, 1964, 1, 568ff.

  30. F. Burlackij,op. cit.

  31. ‘XXIII. s'ezd KPSS’,op. cit.

  32. N. O. Farberov: ‘Obščenarodnoe gosudarstvo — zakonomernyj rezul'tat razvitija gosudarstva diktatury proletariata’.SGiP, 1962, 7, 14–24. “The stateloses the character of an instrument for class-suppression which had always belonged to it. That means that precisely the function which constituted its essence in the whole course of its history now disappears....” Yet Socialist society cannot do without the state for several reasons. “First, because still long after the victory of socialism the state remains the most suitable and rational form of social management...” Further, the state is kept for reasons pertaining to foreign policy. In regard to the functions of the people's state see:Osnovy marksizma-leninizma. M. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cf. P. S. Čeremnych: ‘Obščenarodnoe socialističeskoe gosudarstvo’.VF 1962, 4, 100. A. Kosicyn: ‘Voprosy teorii obščenarodnogo gosudarstva’.Kommunist, 1963, 5, 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Davlet'kelcev: ‘Razvitie XXI s'ezdem KPSS učenija o socialističeskom gosudarstve’.Kommunist, 1959, 14, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Karapetjan-Razin,op. cit. But especially the comprehensive book containing the congress papers,Ot socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti, op. cit.

  36. G. I. Petrov, V. S. Petrov: ‘Socialističeskaja gosudarstvennost’ i občšestvennost’.Izvestija vysšich učebnych zavedenij. Pravovedenie. Leningrad, 1961, 2, 21ff.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Burlackij,op. cit.

  38. Karel Bertelmann: ‘Poznámký k sistému CS socialistickéh práva’. Právnik, Prague, 1961, 8, 639–653.

    Google Scholar 

  39. More extensively in: S. L. Fuks: ‘K voprosu o “polygosudarstve.” Izvestija vysšich učebnych zavedenij’.Pravovedenie, 1965, 3, 18–28. Here p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Farberov,loc. cit. ‘

    Google Scholar 

  41. N. Lomakin: ‘Partija vsego naroda’.Kommunist, 1963, 12, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  42. ‘Ot Partii rabočego klassa k partii vsego naroda’.Kommunist Estonii. Tallin, 1964, 5, 9–21.

  43. A. Butenko: ‘Sovetskoe obščenarodnoe gosudarstro’.Kommunist, 1963, 13, 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  44. V. V. Petrenko:KPSS v period razvernutogo stroitel'stva kommunizma. M. 1963. Znanie Publishing House. p. 38.

  45. Pravda, December 6, 1964, 2–4. Article 1 by the editors: ‘The State of the Whole People’.

  46. More extensively in: Il'inskij,op. cit.

  47. ‘XXIII. S'ezd KPSS i voprosy sovetskogo socialističeskogo gosudarstva i prava’,op. cit.

  48. B. Kozochin: ‘Povysšehie rukovodjaščej roli kommunističeskich i rabočich partij evropejskich narodno-demokratičeskich gosudarstv v razvitia socialističeskoj demokratii’.LGU, no. 11.Serija Ekonomiki, Filosofii i Prava. 1965, 2, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. I. Denisov: ‘O prirode prevraščenija gosudarstva diktatury proletariata v obščenarodnoe gosudarstvo’.Vestnik MGU. Serija X. Pravo. 1965, 1, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Z. V. Šamarin: Nekotorye osobennosti vneśnich funkcij sovetskogo gosudarstva v sovremennyj period.Vestnik MGU. Serija X. Pravo. 1966, 1, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cf. some important sources: I. V. Pavlov: ‘Nekotorye voprosy teorii obščenarodnogo socialističeskogo gosudarstva’.SGiP, 1962, 7, 3–13. G. S. Ostroumov: ‘Pravosoznanie i obščestvennoe mnenie v obščenarodnom gosudarstve.SGiP, 1963, 11, 14–23. ‘Pererastanie norm prava v pravila kommunističeskogo obščezitija’.Sovetskaja Justicija, 1964, 21, 1–3. A. O. Rafikov: ‘Ispolkom gorodskogo soveta i privlečenie obščestvennosti k upravleniju’.SGiP, 1965, 8, 101–104. Zdenek Mlynár:K nekterým teoretickým otažkam vselidové socialistické demokracie. Právnické študie. Pressburg, 1963, 1, 5–28. C. A. Jampol'skaja:Obščestvennye organizacii i razvitie sovetskoj socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti. M. 1965.

  53. Jaroszynski, ibid.

  54. N. Ja. Sokolov: ‘Formy pravotvorčestva v uslovijach obščenarodnogo gosudarstva’.SGiP, 1965, 7, 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cf. the standpoint of the legal literature on the question of the referendum: R. Šafarov: ‘Institut referenduma v uslovijach obščenarodnogo gosudarstva’.SGiP, 1963, 3, 19ff. Sokolov, ibid. Eugeniusz Zielinski: ‘Instytucja referenduma w panstwie socjalistycznym’.Panstwo i prawo, 1965, 2, 232–240. But especially: V. Kotok: ‘O razvitii form socetanija narodnogo predstavitel'stva s neposredstrennoj demokratiej v SSSR’.SGiP, 1960, 12, p. 14ff. And also: V. Kotok:Referendum v systeme socialističeskoj demokrati. M. 1964.

  56. The Supreme Soviet decided, at its plenary session of April 25, 1962, to work out a new constitution, and it elected a commission under Khrushchev to write the draft. Yet after Khrushchev's fall there has hardly been anything said about the new constitution, although the necessity of a new constitution is emphasized again and again. Cf.Prawo i zycie. Warsaw, May 27, 1962, 2–3.

  57. N. G. Aleksandrov, F. I. Kalinycev, D. S. Karev, et al.:Osnovy teorii gosudarstva i prava. Moscow 1960, 104.

  58. Cf.: N. Chalepov: ‘Marksistkaja dialektika i sovremennyj revizionizm’.Kommunist Belorussii. Minsk, 1960, 11, 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sočinenija, 6th ed., vol. X, 61. And Chalepov, ibid.

  60. B. V. Ščetinin: ‘Nekotorye čerty obščenarodonogo socialističeskogo gosudarstva’.Izvestija vysšich učebnych zavedenij. Pravovedenie. Leningrad, 1962, 2, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cf.: V. A. Vajčuk: ‘Razvitie socialističeskoj gosudarstvennosti k kommunističeskomu samoupravleniju’.FN, 1962, 5, 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Fedoseev,op. cit., ‘ pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nikolaev,op. cit., ‘, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Il'inskij,op. cit., p. 8ff. V. I. Kozochin,op. cit.

  65. V. M. Semenov: ‘Principy sovetskogo socialisticeskogo obščenaradnogo prava’.Izvestija vysšich učebnych zavedenij. Pravovedenie. Leningrad, 1964, 1, 16–26. In this article the principles of the people's law are listed in eight points.

    Google Scholar 

  66. László Révész: ‘Recht und Sozialnorm’,op. cit., pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Uj szo. Pressburg, September 25, 1965, 5. Article by László Szántó, academician: ‘Thoughts on Socialist Democracy’.

  68. Cf.: Hans-Jürg Bopp:Marxismus und Rechtswissenschaft. Zollikon, 1963, pp. 21–22.

  69. Cf.: Alexander Patrzalek:Instytucje prawa wyboczego Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej. Warsaw, 1963, 6. Cf. also the review of the book and the position represented therein:Panstwo i prawo, 1964, 5–6, 902–904. Review by Zygmunt Izdebski.

  70. Bol'šaja Sovetskaja Enciklopedija, vol. 29, 131.

  71. The people's proletariat and the peasantry. Sočinenija, 4th ed., vol. 9, 40.

  72. “The revolution is led by the people; the people are the proletariat and the peasants”.Sočinenija, vol. 1, 139.

  73. Sočinenija, vol. 10, 233, and vol. 9, 113.

  74. Cf.: G. Ašin: ‘Kakovo soderžanie ponjatija “narod” v istoričeskom materializme’.Političeskoe samoobrazovanie. M. 1964, 7, 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid. Cf.:

    Google Scholar 

  76. ‘XXIII. s'ezd KPSS’,op. cit. Cf.:

    Google Scholar 

  77. ‘Juridičeskuju nauku — na uroven' zadač kommunističeskogo stroitel'stva’. Leading article by the editors.SGiP, 1966, 3, 3–14. Here p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ibid., pp. 5–6.

  79. ‘Povyšat' rol' provovoj nauki v formirovanii kommunističeskogo mirovozrenija’. Leading article by the editors.SGiP, 1963, 8, pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kommunist, 1964, 12, 70–74.

  81. Cf.SGiP, 1965, 5, 45–52.

  82. Cf. the report of E. V. Tadevosjan inVF 1965, 10, 164–166, with an enumeration of the individual problems of the new planned branch of science.

  83. Cf. the report inSGiP, 1963, 3, 120.

Download references

Authors
  1. Laszlo Revesz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Revesz, L. Open questions in contemporary Soviet philosophy of law and state. Studies in Soviet Thought 6, 202–223 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047134

Keywords

Search

Navigation