Abstract
Flat variograms often are interpreted as representing a lack of spatial autocorrelation. Recent research in earthquake engineering shows that nearby field noise can substantially mask a prominent spatial autocorrelation and result in what appears to be a purely random spatial process. A careful selection of threshold in assigning an indicator function can yield an indicator variogram which reveals underlying spatial autocorrelation. Although this application involves use of seismic data, the results are relevant to geostatistical applications in general.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carr, J. R. and Glass, C. E., 1985, Treatment of earthquake ground motion using regionalized variables: J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol., v. 17, no. 3, p. 221–241.
Journel, A. G., 1983, Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions, J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol., v. 15, no. 3, p. 445–468.
Soulie, M., 1984, Geostatistical applications in geotechnics,in G. Verly (Ed.), Geostatistics for natural resources characterization, part 2: D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands, p. 703–730.
United States Earthquakes, 1955, published by the United States Department of Commerce, Coast and Geodetic Survey, p. 10–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carr, J.R., Bailey, R.E. & Deng, E.D. Use of indicator variograms for an enhanced spatial analysis. Mathematical Geology 17, 797–811 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034062
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034062