Skip to main content
Log in

Monoterpenoid content of sage grouse ingesta

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the monoterpenoid levels in the ingesta from various digestive organs of sage grouse are less than that expected from the big sagebrush leaves ingested. Results supported the hypothesis. Dramatic reductions occurred between the gizzard and duodenum. Monoterpenoid levels in the ceca were nil; thus adverse effects of monoterpenoids on ceca microbes would also be nil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, F., andChowdhury, A.K. 1958. Digestion in the rabbits stomach.Br.J. Nutr. 12:65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T.D., andBraun, C.E. 1978. Weights of Colorado sage grouse.Condor 80:241–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluff, L.K., Welch, B.L., Pederson, J.C., andBrotherson, J.D. 1982. Concentration of monoterpenoids in the rumen ingesta of wild mule deer.J. Range Manage. 35:192–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C.W., Stoddart, L.A., andHarris, L.E. 1952. Determining the digestibility and metabolizable energy of winter range plants by sheep.J. Anim. Sci. 11:578–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, D.R., andNagy, J.G. 1976. Mule deer nutrition and plant utilization, pp. 71–78,in G.W. Workman and J.B. Low (eds.). Mule Deer Decline in the West: A Symposium. Utah State University, Logan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, W.J., Lassak, E.U., andBrophy, J. 1987. Digestion and absorption ofEucalyptus essential oils in greater glider (Petauroides volans) and brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula).J. Chem. Ecol. 13:2115–2130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.S., andFlinders, J.T. 1980. Habitat and dietary relationship of the pygmy rabbit.J. Range Manage. 33:136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igimi, H., Nishimura, M., Kodama, R., andIde, H. 1974. Studies on the metabolism ofd-limonene (p-mentha-1,8-diene). I. The absorption, distribution and excretion ofd-limonene in rats.Xenobiotica 4:77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kufeld, R.C., Wallmo, O.C., andFeddema, C. 1973. Foods of the Rocky Mountain mule deer. USDA For. Ser. Res. Pap. RM-11, Rocky Mount. For. Range Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, H.R. 1956. Food habits of the Great Basin deer herds of California.Cal. Fish Game 42:243–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A.S. 1953. Intestinal morphology of gallineaceous birds in relation to food habits.J. Wildl. Manage. 17:197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, J.G., andRegelin, W.L. 1977. Influence of plant volatile oils on food selection by animals.Proc. Congr. Game Biol. 13:225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, J.G., Steinhoff, H.W., andWard, G.M. 1964. Effects of essential oils of sagebrush on deer rumen microbial function.J. Wildl. Manage. 28:785–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narjisse, H. 1981. Acceptability of big sagebrush to sheep and goats: Role of monoterpenes. PhD dissertation, Utah State University, Logan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, H.F. 1973. Terpenes, pp. 254–309,in L.P. Miller (ed.). Organic Metabolites—Photochemistry, Vol. II. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H.K., Sakae, T., Jones, M.B., andLonghurst, W.M. 1967. Effects of various essential oils isolated from Douglas fir needles upon sheep and deer rumen microbial activity.Appl. Microbiol. 15:777–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H.K., Jones, M.B., andLonghurst, W.M. 1968. Comparison of rumen microbial inhibition resulting from various essential oils isolated from relatively unpalatable plant species.Appl. Microbiol. 16:39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, T.E., andBraun, C.E., 1985. Sage grouse food selection winter, North Park, Colorado.J. Wildl. Manage. 49:1055–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severson, K., May, M., andHepworth, W. 1968. Food preferences, carrying capacities, and forage competition between antelope and domestic sheep in Wyoming's Red Desert. Agric. Exp. Stn., Sci. Monogr. 10. University of Wyoming, Laramie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tueller, P.L. 1979. Food habits and nutrition of mule deer on Nevada ranges. Nev. Agric. Exp. Stn., Res. Paper, University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallmo, O.C., Carpenter, W.L., Regelin, W.L., Gill, R.B., andBaker, D.L. 1977. Evaluation of deer habit on a nutritional basis.J. Range Manage. 30:122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, B.L. 1983. Big sagebrush: Nutrition, selection, and controversy, pp. 21–33,in K.L. Johnson (ed.). Proceedings of the First Utah Shrub Ecology Workshop. College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, B.L., andPederson, J.C. 1981. In vitro digestibility among accessions of big sagebrush by wild mule deer and its relationship to monoterpenoid content.J. Range Manage. 34:497–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, B.L., Mcarthur, E.D., andDavis, J.N. 1983. Mule deer preference and monoterpenoids (essential oils).J. Range Manage. 36:485–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.M., Flinders, J.T., andWelch, B.L. 1982a. Preference of pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis) for various populations of big sagebrush (Arlemisia tridentata).J. Range Manage. 35:724–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.M., Welch, B.L., andFlinders, J.T. 1982b. Monoterpenoid content of pygmy rabbit stomach ingesta.J. Range Manage. 35:107–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The use of trade or firm names in this paper is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welch, B.L., Pederson, J.C. & Rodriguez, R.L. Monoterpenoid content of sage grouse ingesta. J Chem Ecol 15, 961–969 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015191

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015191

Key words

Navigation