Skip to main content
Log in

Combining personality and cognitive ability predictors for hiring service-oriented employees

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent developments in personality theory and assessment have led to calls for inclusion of personality measures in personnel selection. A measure of service-oriented personality was used in conjunction with cognitive and perceptual ability tests in a concurrent validation study of 202 medical clerical positions. The ability tests explained 5% of criterion variance; an additional 5–8% was accounted for by the personality measures. The results were interpreted as tentative support for broadening use of personality measurement in personnel selection, although a need for greater attention to construct validation was also emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, R., Phillips, J., & Alexander, R. (1981). Concurrent and predictive validity designs: A critical reanalysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 588–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1990). Another look at the validity of personality: A dimensional perspective. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami Beach, April.

  • Bowen, D. & Schneider, B. (1985). Boundary spanning role employees and the service encounter: Some guidelines for managers and research. In J. Czepiel, M. Solomon and C. Suprenant (eds.)The service encounter. Lexington, MA: Heath & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D. (1983). The service sector revolution: The automation of services.Long Range Planning, 16(6), 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, D.V. & Silverman, S.B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity.Personnel Psychology, 42, 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E. (1965).The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection.Personnel Psychology, 26, 461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E. & Bartol, R. (1953). The validity of personality inventories in the selection of employees.Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos, C. (1980). Designing a long range marketing strategy for services.Long Range Planning, 13(2), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. (1987). Changing views for personnel selection research.Personnel Psychology, 40, 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. & Gottier, R. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection research.Personnel Psychology, 18, 135–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskett, J. (1986).Managing in the service economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J. & Hogan, R. (1986).Hogan Personnel Selection Series manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., Hogan, R. & Busch, C. (1984). How to measure service orientation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. Page & R. Dienstbier (Eds.),Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. & Hough, L. (1988). Personality assessment for selection and placement decisions. Workshop presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, April.

  • Hogan, R. & Nicholson, R. (1988). The meaning of personality test scores.American Psychologist, 43, 621–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. (1980).Validity generalization for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Employment Service, Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., & Judiesch, M.K. (in press). Individual differences in output as a function of job complexity.Journal of Applied Psychology.

  • Lopez, F.M., Kesslman, G. & Lopez, F.E. (1981). An empirical test of a trait-oriented job analysis technique.Personnel Psychology, 34, 479–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E., Jeanneret, P. & Mecham, R. (1972). A study of characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ),Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 347–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1985). Updating Norman's “adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1989). More reasons to adopt the five-factor model.American Psychologist, 44, 451–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, J.J., Hough, L.M., Toquam, J.L., Hanson, M.A., Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains.Personnel Psychology, 43, 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968).Personality and assessment. NY: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P. (1986). Personnel selection methods. In C.L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.),International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 37–70). NY: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, B. & Alexander, R. (1988). A comparison of criteria for test validation: A meta-analytic investigation.Personnel Psychology, 41, 517–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, B., Ledford, G., Bowen, D. & Cummings, T. (1989). Personality measures as a selection tool for high involvement organizations. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, D.C., August.

  • Noller, P., Law, H. & Comrey, A. (1987). Cattell, Comrey, and Eysenck personality factors compared: More evidence for the five robust factors?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 775–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcraft, G. & Chase, G. (1985). Managing service demand at the point of delivery.Academy of Management Review, 10, 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, E., Olson, R. & Wyckoff, D. (1978).Management of service operations. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippmann, J.S. & Prien, E.P. (1989). An assessment of the contributions of general mental ability and personality characteristics to management success.Journal of Business and Psychology, 3, 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F., Hunter, J., Pearlman, K. & Hirsh, H. (1985). Forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 38, 697–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., Gooding, R., Noe, R. & Kirsch, M. (1984). Metaanalyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics.Personnel Psychology, 37, 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. & Bowen, D. (1985). Employee and customer perceptions of services in banks: Replication and extension.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 423–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. & Schmitt, N. (1987).Staffing organizations (2nd ed.) Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H.M. & Adler, S. (1984). Personality and organizational behavior.Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. (1987, September). How interpersonal are the MMPI personality disorder scales? InCurrent research in MMPI personality disorder scales. Symposium presented at the annual meetings of the American Psychological Association, New York. “Workplace drug testing up; further increases likely.” (1987).Resource, February, 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the University of Colorado Graduate School of Business for data entry and analysis, as well as the cooperation of the National Computer Systems Corporation and of Kaiser Permanente and its employees. We are also indebted to Garth Coombs, Deborah Crown, and Chuck Hulin for their insightful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosse, J.G., Miller, H.E. & Barnes, L.K. Combining personality and cognitive ability predictors for hiring service-oriented employees. J Bus Psychol 5, 431–445 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014493

Keywords

Navigation