Skip to main content
Log in

On the microscopic background of the Onsager-Casimir reciprocity relations

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been known for some time that small deviations from the Onsager-Casimir symmetry relations are introduced when one passes from a given description of a system to a less detailed one by adiabatic elimination of fast variables. Exact validity is preserved, however, for a slightly modified form of these relations. In this paper the question is considered whether this modified Onsager symmetry is also preserved by the transition from a microscopic to a mesoscopic description, the step that introduces manifest irreversibility into the equations of motion. This question is examined in detail for a system of a few heavy oscillators coupled to a bath, a model discussed in a recent paper by van Kampen. The modified Onsager symmetry survives the transition to an irreversible description via the dense spectrum approximation. This is shown explicitly by inspection of the results obtained by van Kampen; some arguments favoring a more general validity are also briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Onsager,Phys. Rev. 37:405 (1931);38:2265 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. B. G. Casimir,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17:343 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. A. McLennan,Phys. Rev. A 10:1272 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. U. Geigenmüller, U. M. Titulaer, and B. U. Felderhof,Physica 119A:53 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. F. Hubmer and U. M. Titulaer,J. Stat. Phys. 49:331 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. F. Hubmer and U. M. Titulaer,J. Stat. Phys. 50:913 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. G. van Kampen,Physica 147A:165 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. U. Felderhof and U. M. Titulaer,Physica 100A:563 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. M. Titulaer and B. U. Felderhof,Physica 100A:573 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. G. van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981), Chapter V.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. G. van Kampen,Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 26(15) (1951).

  13. H. Mori,Prog. Theor. Phys. 34:423 (1965); R. Zwanzig,Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (Wiley, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. M. Titulaer,Physica 100A:234 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. U. Geigenmüller, U. M. Titulaer, and B. U. Felderhof,Physica 119A:41 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Bloch,Nucl. Phys. 6:329 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  17. U. Geigenmüller, U. M. Titulaer, and B. U. Felderhof,Physica 120A:635 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Ullersma,Physica 32:27, 56, 74, 90 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Ullersma and J. A. Tjon,Physica 71:294 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Machta and I. Oppenheim,Physica 112A:361 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Prof. Nico van Kampen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Titulaer, U.M. On the microscopic background of the Onsager-Casimir reciprocity relations. J Stat Phys 53, 61–75 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011545

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011545

Key words

Navigation