Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback training for controlling arousal in subsequent stressful situations

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-five subjects participated in (1) a pretreatment session during which arousal was measured while subjects anticipated and then viewed a stressful film; (2) four 20-min treatment sessions during which subjects received either contingent EMG biofeedback (biofeedback treatment), instructions to attend to a variable pitch tone (attention-placebo control), instructions to relax as much as possible (instructions-only control), or instructions to sit quietly (no-treatment control); and (3) a posttreatment session that was identical to the pretreatment session. Results indicate that when compared to the subjects in the control conditions, subjects who received EMG biofeedback were not effective in reducing frontalis EMG levels during treatment or while viewing the stressful film, but they were effective in reducing frontalis EMG levels while anticipating the stressful film. There was no evidence that EMG biofeedback influenced either skin conductance or self-reports of arousal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, A. B. An experimental test of assumptions relating to the use of electro-myographic biofeedback as a general relaxation technique.Psychophysiology 1975,12 656–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, A. B., White, P. D., & Wallace, H. M. Training and transfer of training effects in EMG biofeedback assisted muscular relaxation.Psychophysiology 1977,14 551–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., & Stoyva, J. M. An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1969,2 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., Stoyva, J., & Adler, C. Feedback-induced muscle relaxation: Application to tension headache.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1970,1 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., Stoyva, J. M., Adler, C. S., & Mullaney, D. J. EMG biofeedback and tension headache: A controlled outcome study.Psychosomatic Medicine 1973,35 484–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, A., Kondo, C. Y., & Knott, J. R. A comparison of EMG feedback and progressive muscle relaxation training in anxiety neurosis.British Journal of Psychiatry 1975,127 470–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, R. D. Electromyograph feedback as a relaxation technique.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 825–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. J., Freundlich, A., & Meyer, R. G. Differential effectiveness of electromyograph feedback, verbal relaxation instructions, and medication placebo with tension headaches.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 892–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. How should we measure “change”—or should we?Psychological Bulletin 1970,74 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGood, D. E., & Chisholm, R. C. Multiple response comparison of parietal EEG and frontalis EMG biofeedback.Psychophysiology 1977,14 258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. H., & Blanchard, E. B. Biofeedback, self-control, and self-management.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1977,2 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. P., & Von Storch, T. Tension headaches.Journal of the American Medical Association 1953,151 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J., Korman, M., Weis, C. B., Smith, D., & Clarke, L. A multiple-response evaluation of EMG biofeedback performance during training and stress-induction conditions.Psychophysiology 1978,15 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. N., Griffin, P., Mooney, D., & Parise, M. Electromyographic biofeedback and relaxation instructions in the treatment of muscle contraction headaches.Behavior Therapy 1975,6 672–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. N., Moseley, D., & McGowan, W. T. Relaxation training and biofeedback in the reduction of frontalis muscle tension.Psychophysiology 1975,12 547–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, D. F., & Reinking, R. H. Tension headaches: What form of therapy is most effective?Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, R. A., & Staudenmayer, H. Baseline levels in muscle relaxation training.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1978,3 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotses, H., Glaus, K. D., Crawford, P. L., Edwards, J. E., & Scherr, M. S. Operant reduction of frontalis EMG activity in the treatment of asthma in children.Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1976,20 453–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. The evaluation of autonomic responses: Toward a general solution.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1956,67 123–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmo, R. B., Shagass, C., & Davis, F. H. Symptom specificity and bodily reactions during psychiatric interview.Psychosomatic Medicine 1950,12 362–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, C. The modification of tension headaches pain using EMG biofeedback.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1977,15 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, M., Johnson, G., & Rondestvedt, J. Chronic anxiety treated by feedback-induced muscle relaxation.Archives of General Psychiatry 1973,23 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, J. L., & Mealiea, W. L. Biofeedback-assisted cue controlled relaxation for the treatment of flight phobias.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1975,6 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, R. H., & Kohl, M. L. Effects of various forms of relaxation training on physiological and self-report measures of relaxation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 595–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schandler, S. L., & Grings, W. W. An examination of methods for producing relaxation during short-term laboratory sessions.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1976,14 419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedivy, D. I., & Kleinman, K. M. Lack of correlation between frontalis EMG and either neck EMG or verbal ratings of tension.Psychophysiology 1977,14 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sime, W. E., & DeGood, D. E. Effect of EMG biofeedback and progressive muscle relaxation training on awareness of frontalis muscle tension.Psychophysiology 1977,14 522–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasekera, I. Instructions and EMG feedback in systematic desensitization: A case report.Behavior Therapy 1972,3 460–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, J. Basimetric approach (law of initial value) to biological rhythms.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1962,98 1211–1220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Fraser Hall, University of Kansas, 66045, Lawrence, Kansas

    Donn H. Nielsen & David S. Holmes

Authors
  1. Donn H. Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David S. Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported in part by Bio-Medical and General Research Fund grants from the University of Kansas to David S. Holmes. Appreciation is due to B. Kent Houston, Edward F. Morrow, and Charles A. Hallenbeck for their contributions to the project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, D.H., Holmes, D.S. Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback training for controlling arousal in subsequent stressful situations. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 5, 235–248 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998599

Keywords

Search

Navigation