Skip to main content
Log in

The social implications of higher level thinking skills

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes theoretical and empirical research suggesting that individuals who are capable of perceiving others in complex and divergent ways may be able to communicate more effectively, adapting verbal messages to fit the perspectives of listeners. This proposition represents a link between several fields of inquiry that researchers rarely interrelate: higher level thinking skills, social cognition, social competency, and communications. Key concepts within each field are historically defined, and directions for future research are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levenson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N. (1950).The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1969).Creative Person, Creative Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1953). Complexity-simplicity as a personality dimension.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 48: 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 51: 478–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., and Welsh, G. S. (1952). Artistic perception as a factor in personality style: Its measurement by a figure-preference test.Journal of Psychology 33: 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, M. J. and Payne, S. K. (1985). Is construct differentiation loquacity?Human Communication Research 11: 605–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromage, B. K., and Mayer, R. E. (1981). Relationship between what is remembered and creative problem-solving performance in science learning.Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971).Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. A., and delia, J. G. (1977). Cognitive complexity, social perspective-taking, and functional persuasive skills in second- to ninth-grade children.Human Communication Research 3: 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosden, M. A., Ellis, H. C. and Feeney, D. M. (1979). Cognitive flexibility-rigidity, repetition effects, and memory.Journal of Research in Personality 13: 386–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V., Crutchfield, R. S., Davies, L., and Olton, R. M. (1974).The Productive Thinking Program: A Course in Learning to Think. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, W. H. (1965). Cognitive complexity and expression formation. In B. A. Maher (ed.),Progress in Experimental Personality Research, vol. 2, pp. 47–90. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, W. H., Press, A. N., Delia, J. G., and Kenny, C. T. (1974). The structural analysis of the organization of written impressions. Mimeo, Dept. of Psychology, University of Kansas.

  • Dean, R. S., and Garabedian, A. A. (1981). The personality characteristics of the rigid learner.Journal of School Psychology 19: 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • deBono, E. (1967).The Five-Day Course in Thinking. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delia, J. G., and Clark, R. A. (1977). Cognitive complexity, social perception, and the development of listener-adapted communication in six-, eight-, ten-, and twelve-year old boys.Communication Monographs 44: 326–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delia, J. G., Clark, R. A., and Switzer, D. E. (1974). Cognitive complexity and impression formation in informal social interaction.Speech Monographs 41: 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., and Harman, H. H. (1979). Cognitive factors: Their identification and replication.Multivariate Behavior Research Monographs, 79-2.

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1941). The general factor in aesthetic judgments.British Journal of Psychology 31: 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feffer, M. H. (1959). The cognitive implications of role-taking behavior.Journal of Personality 27: 152–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving.Review of Educational Research 54: 363–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M. (1970).The Conditions of Learning 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. (1943). Concerning rigidity.Character & Personality 11: 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M. (1986). Conceptual and definition issues in the assessment of children's social skills: Implications for classification and training.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 15: 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity.American Psychologist 5: 444–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C. L., and Delia, J. G. (1976). Cognitive complexity and social perspective-taking.Communication Monographs 43: 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality.Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoz, R. (1981). The effects of rigidity on school geometry learning.Educational Studies in Mathematics 12: 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, L. (1969).Contrary Imaginations. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1987a). Measurements of divergent and complex thinking. Article submitted for publication.

  • Kagan, D. M. (1987b). Divergent thinking and social cognition among fifth and sixth graders. Article submitted for publication.

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955).The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P., and Cooper, C. (1985). Rigid personality and rigid thinking.British Journal of Educational Psychology 55: 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. A. (1935).A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchins, A. S., and Luchins, E. H. (1959).Rigidity of Behavior. Eugene, Ore.: University of Oregon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., and Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving.Psychological Monographs 76(10): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes, S. J. (1967).Creative Behavior Guidebook. New York: Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1969).The Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. C., Jordan, W. J., and Street, R. L. (1979). Language indices in the measurement of cognitive complexity: Is complexity loquacity?Human Communication Research 6: 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1960).The Open and Closed Mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H. (1973). Egocentrism in childhood: A unitary construct?Child Development 44: 102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. L., and Rafoth, B. A. (1986). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of expository and persuasive writing among college freshmen.Research in the Teaching of English 20: 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., and Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of adolescent gifted and nongifted children.Educational and Psychological Measurement 45: 483–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savell, J. M., Twohig, P. T., and Rachford, D. L. (1986). Empirical status of Feurstein's “Instrumental Enrichment” (FIE) Technique as a method of teaching thinking skills.Review of Educational Research 56: 381–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarlett, H. H., Press, A. N., and Crockett, W. H. (1971). Children's descriptions of peers: A Wernerian developmental analysis.Child Development 42: 439–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shantz, C. U. (1975). The development of social cognition. In E. M. Heatherington (ed.),Review of Child Development Research, Vol. 5, pp. 257–323. Chicago: U. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. J. (1983). The effect of process-oriented science curriculum upon problem-solving ability.Science Education 67(5): 615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment.Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1984). What should intelligence tests test? Implications of a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing.Educational Researcher 13: 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, I. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent.American Psychologist 9: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1944). A factorial study of perception.Psychometric Monograph, No. 4.

  • Torrance, E. P. (1962).Guiding Creative Talent. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J. (1986). Research on creativity.Gifted Child Quarterly 30(1): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1946). The concept of rigidity: A Critical evaluation.Psychological Review 53: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1957).Comparative Psychology of Mental Development. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kagan, D.M. The social implications of higher level thinking skills. Res High Educ 27, 176–187 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992368

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992368

Keywords

Navigation