Skip to main content
Log in

String and graph grammar characterizations of bounded regular languages

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two grammatical characterizations of the bounded regular languages are presented: one in terms of graph grammars, the other using string grammars. First it is shown that a class of state graphs recognizing the bounded regular languages can be generated by a particular second-order contextfree graph grammar. Next we call uniquely recursive a right-linear (string) grammar having at most one right-recursive production for each of its nonterminals. It is then established that the class of languages generated by uniquely recursive, sequential right-linear grammars is exactly the bounded regular languages. Some comments on the relationship between string and graph grammars are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Abe, M. Mizumoto, J. Toyoda, and K. Tanaka, “Web grammars and several graphs,”J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 7:37–65 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Aho and J. D. Ullman,The Theory of Parsing, Translation and Compiling, Vol. 1 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. R. Cook, “First order graph grammars,”SIAM J. Comput. 3:90–99 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ginsburg,The Mathematical Theory of Context-free Languages (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Ginsburg and S. Griebach, “Abstract Families of Languages,” inStudies in Abstract Families of Languages, Am. Math. Soc. Memoir No.87, 1–32 (1969).

  6. S. Ginsburg and E. H. Spanier, “Bounded ALGOL-like languages,”Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 113:333–368 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ginsburg and E. H. Spanier, “Bounded regular sets,”Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 17:1043–1049 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Goldstine, “Bounded AFLs,”Quarterly Report No. 40, Institute for Computer Research, University of Chicago (1974).

  9. J. Goldstine, “Substitution and bounded languages,”J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 6:9–29 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. G. Montanari, “Separable graphs, planar graphs and web grammars,”Inf. Control 16:243–267 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Pavlidis, “Linear and context-free graph grammars,”J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 19:11–22 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. W. Pratt, “Pair grammars, graph languages and string-to-graph translations,”J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 5:560–595 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. B. Salomon, “The decidability of a mapping problem for generalized sequential machines with final states,”J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 10:200–218 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Shamir, “On sequential languages and two classes of regular events,”Z. Phonetik, Sprach. Kommun. 18:61–69 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salomon, K.B. String and graph grammar characterizations of bounded regular languages. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 7, 1–10 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991938

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991938

Key words

Navigation