Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Econometric analyses of electoral behavior: A critical review

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the major econometric analyses of electoral behavior in the United States. After a discussion of the early works in this area, analysis focuses on the recent debate precipitated by Kramer's 1971 work. The most important econometric works are summarized so that political scientists not working in this area but still interested in understanding the economic influences on voting can become acquainted with the substantive conclusions of each work and learn something of the different variables and methodologies employed in the analysis. For scholars engaged in research in this field, the paper will serve as a useful summary of previous works. The conclusion discusses major points of controversy and suggests specific research questions toward which future work should be directed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerman, J. Political economic cycles.Kyklos, 1947,I, 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, K.The creation of a Democratic majority, 1928–1936. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcelus, F., and Meltzer, A. H. The effect of aggregate economic conditions on congressional elections.American Political Science Review, 1975,LXIX (4), 1232–1239. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcelus, F., and Meltzer, A. H. Aggregate economic variables and votes for Congress: a rejoinder.American Political Science Review, 1975,LXIX (4), 1266–1269. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcelus, F. Effects of aggregate economic variables on the distribution of House seats. Paper presented at the 1978 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 20–22, 1978.

  • Barnhart, J. D. Rainfall and the Populist Party in Nebraska.American Political Science Review, 1925,XIX (3), 527–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B.Sociologists, economists and democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, L.Ballot behavior. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Public Affairs, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, L.How to predict elections. New York: Knopf, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. S., and Price, H. D. Comment.American Political Science Review, 1975,69 (4), 1240–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, R. A. The puzzle of political participation in America. In Anthony King (ed.), InThe New American political system. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1978, pp. 287–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, R. A., and Page, B. I. Indifference, alienation and rational decisions.Public Choice, 1973,15, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, R. A., and Page, B. I. The impact of events on presidential popularity: The Johnson and Nixon administrations. In Aaron Wildavsky (ed.),Perspectives on the Presidency. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975, pp. 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, R. A., and Sniderman, P. M. From life space to polling place: the relevance of personal concerns for voting behavior.British Journal of Political Science, 1977,7 (July), 337–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D.Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York: W. W. Norton, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. S., Miller, W. S., and Stokes, D. E.The American Voter. New York: Wiley, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conforto, Bruce M., and Shapiro, Robert Y. Presidential performance, the economy and the public's evaluation of economic conditions: a piece of the midterm election puzzle. Unpublished manuscript, 1978.

  • Davis, O., Hinich, M., and Ordeshook, P. An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process.American Political Science Review, 1970,64, 426–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A.An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. A., and Fiorina, M. P. The decline in turnout in presidential elections. Paper presented at the Conference on Voter Turnout, San Diego, May 16–19, 1979.

  • Fiorina, M. P.Representatives, roll calls and constituencies. Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. P. Economic retrospective voting in American elections: a microanalysis.American Journal of Political Science, 1978,22 (2), 426–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. The politico-economic system: a simulation model.Kyklos, 1974,XXVII (2), 227–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., and Schneider, F. An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States.Review of Economics and Statistics, 1978,60 (2), 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S., and Kramer, G. H. Comment on Arcelus and Meltzer, The effect of aggregate economic conditions on congressional elections.American Political Science Review, 1975,LXIX (4), 1255–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H. and Coleman, W. Political trends in industrial America: Pennsylvania an example.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1949, 473–486.

  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. Industrial conflict in advanced societies.American Political Science Review, 1976,LXX (4), 1033–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. Political parties and macroeconomic policy.American Political Science Review, 1977,71 (3), 1467–1487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. The mass public and macroeconomic policy: the dynamic of public opinion toward unemployment and inflation. Paper presented at the 1978 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, August 31–September 3, 1978.American Journal of Political Science, 1979, forthcoming.

  • Hinich, M. J. Voting as an act of contribution. Paper presented at the Conference on Voter Turnout, San Diego, May 16–19, 1979.

  • Katona, G.Psychological Analysis of Economic Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, S. Presidential popularity and negative voting: an alternative explanation of the midterm congressional decline of the president's party.American Political Science Review, 1977,71 (1), 44–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, S. Explaining presidential popularity.American Political Science Review, 1978,72 (2), 506–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. A. A quantitative study of political behavior, 1840–1950.Journal of Social Psychology, 1944,LX (1), 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O., Jr. A theory of critical elections.Journal of Politics, 1955,17 (February), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O., Jr. (With the assistance of Milton Cummings, Jr.)The responsible electorate: rationality in presidential voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. R., and Kinder, D. R. Political consequences of economic concerns—personal and collective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, New York, August 31–September 3, 1978.

  • Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R. Economic discontent and political behavior: the role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting. Paper presented at the 85th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 1977.

  • Klorman, R. Trend in personal finances and the vote.Public Opinion Quarterly 1978,42 (1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964.American Political Science Review 1971,LXV (1), 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, S. Voting behavior and aggregate policy targets.Public Choice 1976,18 (Summer), 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. D., and Monroe, K. R. Economic expectations and presidential popularity: a model of the short-term politico-economic interaction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, Charleston, South Carolina, March 17–19, 1979.

  • Linehan, W. J., and Schrodt, P. A. Size, competitiveness, and the probability of influencing an election. Paper presented at the Conference on Voter Turnout, San Diego, May 16–19, 1979.

  • MacRae, D. A political model of the business cycle.Journal of Political Economy, 85 (2), 239–263.

  • Monroe, K. Economic influences on presidential popularity.Public Opinion Quarterly 1978, 42 (3), 360–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson.American Political Science Review 1970,LXIV (1), 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J.War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neprash, J. A.The Brookhart Campaign in Iowa, 1920–1926. New York: Columbia University Press, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. The political business cycle.Review of Economic Studies 1975,XLII (2), 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, W. F., and Coombs, L. The economic factor in the Roosevelt elections.American Political Science Review 1940,34 (4), 719–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I. Elections and social choice: the state of the evidence.American Journal of Political Science 1977,XXI (3), 639–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, F. A., and Myers, W. I. Prices and presidents.Farm Economics. Ithaca: New York State College of Agriculture, 1948,163 (September), 4210–4218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piereson, J. E. Presidential popularity and midterm voting at different electoral levels.American Journal of Political Science 1975,XIX (4), 683–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piereson, J. E. District economic conditions and congressional elections. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 21–23, 1977.

  • Pollard, W. Effects of economic conditions on elections—a study controlling for political variables. Paper presented at the Meetings of the Public Choice Society, New Orleans, March 1978.

  • Pomper, G. M.Voters' Choice: Varieties of American Behavior. New York: Dodd Mead, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, A. et al. The effect of economic conditions on congressional elections, 1946–1958.Review of Economics and Statistics 1962,XLIV 458–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. A.Quantitative aspects of politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. Discussion (of Stigler's paper).American Economic Review 1973,63 (2), 178–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W., and Ordeshook, P. C. A theory of the calculus of voting.American Political Science Review 1968,62 (1), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W., and Ordeshook, P. C.An introduction to positive political theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. Different (income) classes and presidential popularity: an empirical analysis.Munich Social Science Review 1978,2, 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.Models of man. New York: Wiley, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George. General economic conditions and national elections.American Economic Review 1973,63 (2), 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbitts, C. Majority votes and the business cycle.American Journal of Sociology 1931,XXXVI (4), 596–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. The relationship between seats and votes in two-party systems.American Political Science Review 1973,67 (2), 540–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. Determinants of the outcomes of midterm congressional elections.American Political Science Review 1975,69 (3) 812–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R.Political control of the economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, M. Economic conditions and electoral outcomes: class differences in the political response to recession.American Journal of Political Science 1977,22 (4), 917–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, H. F. Rational abstention due to satisfaction: a revised look at the effect of candidate evaluations on turnout. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 21–23, 1977.

  • Weisberg, H. F., and Grofman, B. Candidate evaluations and turnout. Paper presented at the Conference on Voter Turnout, San Diego, May 16–19, 1979.

  • Wides, J. W. Self-perceived economic change and political orientations: a preliminary exploration.American Politics Quarterly 1976,4 (October), 395–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, T., and Hart, H. Prosperity and political victory.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1950, 331–335.

  • Wright, G. The political economy of New Deal spending: an econometric analysis.Review of Economics and Statistics 1974,LXI (1), 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinser, J. E., Hausafus, K. F., and Dawson, P. A. (1979). The rational allocation of time and electoral participation. Paper presented at the Conference on Voter Turnout, San Diego, May 16–19, 1979.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York University, USA

    Kristen R. Monroe (Assistant Professor of Politics)

Authors
  1. Kristen R. Monroe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monroe, K.R. Econometric analyses of electoral behavior: A critical review. Polit Behav 1, 137–173 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989992

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989992

Keywords

Search

Navigation