Skip to main content
Log in

The mobilization of political discontent

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although political discontent has risen substantially among Americans since the mid-sixties, there is considerable disagreement about the implications of this trend for individual political behavior and system performance. This paper develops a conceptual and theoretical framework within which this question can be examined. Two dimensions of political discontent, low diffuse support and external inefficacy, are hypothesized as motivations for political action when certain other conditions are met. In addition, because each of these orientations should be associated with different styles of political behavior, the mobilizing potential of political discontent may be greater than previous studies have indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberbach, J. D. (1977). “Power Consciousness: A Comparative Analysis.”American Political Science Review 71: 1544–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abravanel, M. D., and R. J. Busch (1975). “Political Competence, Political Trust, and the Action Orientations of University Students.”Journal of Politics, 37: 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch, G. I., and L. A. Kellstedt (1975). “Trust in the Political System: A Construct Validation.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, Calif., September 2–6, 1975.

  • Beck, P. A., and M. K. Jennings (1979). “Political Periods and Political Participation.”American Political Science Review 73: 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J. (1974). “Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.”American Political Science Review 68: 973–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, K. M., and C. L. Davis (1976). “The Structural Context of Politics and Dimensions of Regime Performance: Their Importance for the Comparative Study of Political Efficacy.”Comparative Political Studies 9: 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E. (1972). “Change in the American Electorate.” In A. Campbell and P. E. Converse (Eds.),The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 263–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. C. (1979). “Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma.”American Politics Quarterly 7: 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1965).A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1975). “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support.”British Journal of Political Science 5: 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finifter, A. W. (1970). “Dimensions of Political Alienation.”American Political Science Review 64: 389–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J. (1970). “The Mistrustful-Efficacious Hypothesis and Political Participation.”Journal of Politics 32: 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A. (1968).Power and Discontent. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A. (1971). “Political Trust and its Ramifications.” In G. Abcarian and J. W. Soule (Eds.),Social Psychology and Political Behavior. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, pp. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970).Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, V. (1978).Distrust and Democracy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B. W., Marando, V. L., and Taylor, G. A. (1971). “Efficacy, Mistrust, and Political Participation: Findings from Additional Data and Indicators.”Journal of Politics 33: 1130–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1977).The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, A. (1977).Protest and Political Consciousness. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. H. (1974). “Political Issues and Trust in Government.”American Political Science Review 68: 951–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. H. (1979). “The Institutional Focus of Political Distrust.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C., August 31–September 3, 1979.

  • Miller, W. E., A. H. Miller, and E. J. Schneider (1980).American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook, 1952–1978. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N. (1977). “Behavioral Correlates of Political Support.”American Political Science Review 71: 454–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N., and T. O. Jukam (1977). “On the Meaning of Political Support.”American Political Science Review 71: 1561–1595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J. M. (1971). “Political Orientation and Riot Participation.”American Sociological Review 36: 810–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, A. H., M. D. Menchik, J. M. Chaiken, P. L. Ellickson, W. E. Walker, D. N. De Tray, and A. E. Wise (1979).Fiscal Containment of Local and State Government. Rand report, R-2494-FF/RC.

  • Schwartz, D. C. (1973).Political Alienation and Political Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O., and J. B. McConahay. (1973).The Politics of Violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, M. A. (1980) “Trust, Efficacy and Modes of Political Participation: A Study of Costa Rican Peasants.”British Journal of Political Science 10: 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. E. (1962). “Popular Evaluations of Government: An Empirical Assessment.” In H. Cleveland and H. D. Lasswell (Eds.),Ethics and Bigness. New York: Kraus Reprint Co., pp. 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., and Nie, N. H. (1972).Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. W. (1973). “Efficacy, Trust, and Orientation Toward Socio-political Authority: Students' Support for the University.”American Journal of Political Science 17: 282–301.(a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. W. (1973). “Efficacy, Trust, and Commitment to the Political Process.”Social Science Quarterly 54: 623–631.(b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. D. (1976).The Dissent of the Governed. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurcher, L. A., Jr., and J. K. Monts (1972). “Political Efficacy, Political Trust, and Anti-pornography Crusading: A Research Note.”Sociology and Social Research 56: 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craig, S.C. The mobilization of political discontent. Polit Behav 2, 189–209 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989890

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989890

Keywords

Navigation