Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reproductive conflicts ofPalicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae) a distylous shrub of a tropical cloud forest in Mexico

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied a population of the distylousPalicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae) in a cloud forest remnant near Xalapa City, Veracruz, México to explore possible asymmetries between floral morphs in the attractiveness to pollinators, seed dispersers, nectar robbers, floral parasites, and herbivores. We first assessed heterostyly and reciprocal herkogamy by measuring floral attributes such as corolla length (buds and open flowers), style and anther heights, stigma and stamen lengths and the distance between the anther tip to the stigma lobe. We then estimated floral and fruit attributes such as flower size, anther height, number and size of pollen grains, fruit size, seed size, nectar production, and flower and fruit standing crops to assess differences between floral morphs in attracting and effectively using mutualistic pollinators and seed dispersers. Also, floral parasitism and nectar robbing were assessed in this study as a measure of flower attractiveness to antagonists. The system seems to conform well to classical heterostyly (e.g. reciprocal stamen/style lengths, pollen and anther dimorphism, intramorph incompatibility) yet, there were several tantalizing differences observed between pin and thrum morphs. Thrum flowers have longer corollas and larger but fewer pollen grains than pin flowers. Both morphs produced the same total number of inflorescences, developed the same number of buds, and opened the same number of flowers per inflorescence during the flowering season. Nectar production and sugar concentration were similar between floral morphs but the reward was not offered symmetrically to floral visitors throughout the day. Nectar concentration was higher in pin flowers in the afternoon. The numbers of developing, fully developed, and ripe fruits were the same between floral morphs, however, fruits and seeds were larger than those of thrums. The incidence of fly larvae was higher among thrum flowers and damage by nectar robbing was the same between floral morphs. Fruit abortion patterns of flowers manually pollinated suggest intra-morph sterility (self and intramorph incompatibility). There were no differences between morphs in fruit and seed set per flower following legitimate pollination although thrums were more leaky than the pins (intramorph compatibility).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson W. R. (1973) A morphological hypothesis for the origin of heterostyly in the Rubiaceae. Taxon 22: 537–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M. (1994) Sexual selection in plants. In: Andersson M. (ed.) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 396–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker H. G. (1956) Pollen dimorphism in the Rubiaceae. Evolution 10: 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker H. G. (1966) The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 20: 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. C. H. (1990) The evolution and adaptive significance of heterostyly. TREE 5: 144–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. C. H. (1992) Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model system for evolutionary analysis. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Wien New York, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa K. S., Beach H. (1983) Self-incompatibility systems in the Rubiaceae of a tropical lowland wet forest. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 1281–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach J. H., Bawa K. S. (1980) Role of pollination in the evolution of dioecy from distyly. Evolution 34: 1138–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D. R., Waser N. M. (1987) The evolution of plant mating systems: multilocus simulations of pollen dispersal. Amer. Nat. 129: 593–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D. (1979) The maintenance and breakdown of distyly. Amer. Nat. 114: 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras P. S. (1998) Biología reproductiva dePalicourea padifolia Roemer and Schultes (Rubiaceae): un arbusto distílico de un bosque mesófilo de monaña. Tesis de Licenciatura (Biología). Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin B., Stephenson A. G. (1985) Sex differential floral longevity, nectar secretion, and pollinator foraging in a protrandrous species. Amer. J. Bot. 72: 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez C., Ávila-Sakar G., Vázquez-Santana S., Márquez-Guzmán J. (1997) Morph-biased male sterility in the tropical distylous shrubErythroxylum havanense (Erythroxylaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 84: 626–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulberger R. (1975) S-Gene action and the significance of characters in heterostylous syndrome. Heredity 35: 407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulberger R. (1992) Floral polymorphisms and their functional significance in the heterostylous syndrome. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Wien New York, pp. 41–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P., Busby W. H. (1987) Pollen carryover: experimental comparisons between morphs ofPalicourea lasiorrachis (Rubiaceae), in a distylous, bird-pollinated, tropical treelet. Oecologia 73: 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P., Colwell R. K. (1978) Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds. Amer. Zool. 18: 779–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P., Tiebout H. M., Young B. E. (1991) Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density-dependent interactions? Field experiments. Ecology 72: 1953–1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders F. R. (1979a) The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand J. Bot. 17: 607–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders F. R. (1979b) Heterostyly inLithospermum cobrense (Boraginaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 66: 746–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton C. W. (1989) Variations on a distylous theme in MesoamericanPsychotria subgenusPsychotria (Rubiaceae). Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 55: 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns C. N., Inouye D. W. (1993) Techniques for pollination biology. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn J. R., Barrett S. C. H. (1992) Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution 46: 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. (1968) The breeding system ofLithospermum caroliniense: adaptation and counteradaptation. Amer. J. Bot. 102: 427–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G. (1982) Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. Amer. Nat. 120: 571–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G. (1986) The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in Angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand J. Bot. 24: 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G., Webb C. J. (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Bot. Rev. 43: 177–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G. (1992) The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Wien New York, pp. 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G., Yates J. M. (1982) Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified byWahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36: 903–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorence D. (1990) A phylogenetic list of the genera of Rubiaceae in Mexico. Acta Bot. Mex. 12: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R. J. (1993) Adaptive significance ofIpomopsis aggregata nectar production: observation and experiment in the field. Evolution 47: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niessen K., Wells S., McDade L., Bakarr M., Boyle B., Eisen M. (1990) Heterostyly in eleven species of Rubiaceae. In: Loiselle B. (ed.) Tropical Biology 90-3. O.T.S. Organization for Tropical Studies (OTS), Costa Rica, pp. 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R. (1976) The reproductive system ofAmsinckia grandiflora, a distylous species. Syst. Bot. 1: 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R. (1980) Heterostyly, population composition and pollen flow inHedyotis caerulea. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pailler T., Thompson J. D. (1997) Distyly and variation in heteromorphic incompatibility inGaertnera vaginata (Rubiaceae) endemic to La Reunion Island. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Nasser N., Eguiarte L. E., Piñero D. (1993) Mating systems in the Rubiaceae of a tropical lowland wet forest. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 1281–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ree R. H. (1997) Pollen flow, fecundity, and the adaptive significance of heterostyly inPalicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae). Biotropica 29: 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards J. H., Barrett S. C. H. (1992) The development of heterostyly. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Wien New York, pp. 85–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards J. H., Koptur S. (1993) Floral variation and distyly inGuettarda scabra (Rubiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riveros G. M., Barria O. R., Humaña P. A. M. (1995) Self compatibility in distylousHedyotis salzmannii (Rubiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 194: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. (1978) La vegetación de México. Editorial Limusa, México, D. F. Ramírez N., Xena De Enrech N., Sobrevila C. (1983) Reproductive biology ofPalicourea fendleri andP. petiolaria (Rubiaceae) heterostylous shrubs of a tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 15: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson A. G., Bertin R. I. (1983) Male competition, female choice and sexual selection in plants. In: Real L. (ed.) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 110–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone J. L. (1995) Pollen donation patterns in a tropical distylous shrub (Psychotria surrensis: Rubiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 1390–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. M. (1989) Revision ofPalicourea (Rubiaceae) in Mexico and Central America. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 26: 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. M. (1993) Revision ofPalicourea (Rubiaceae: Psychotriae) in the West Indies. Moscosoa. 7: 201–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. M. (1996) Overview of the Psychotriae (Rubiaceae) in the Neotropics. Opera. Bot. Belg. 7: 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. M. (1997) Conspectus of the genusPalicourea (Rubiaceae: Psychotriae) with the description of the some new species from Ecuador and Colombia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 224–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. M., Lorence D. H. (1985) Lectotypification ofPalicourea geleottiana M. Martens (Rubiaceae) and a new name for this common species. Taxon 34: 667–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolome J. (1993) Caída de hojarasca y comportamiento fenológico de las especies arbóreas del bosque mesófilo de montaña del Parque Ecológico Francisco X. Clavijero. Tesis de Licenciatura (Biología). Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier B. S. (1967) The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the Angiosperms. Evolution 21: 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser N. M., Price M. V. (1983) Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour inDelphinium nelsonii. Nature 302: 422–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb C. J., Lloyd D. G. (1986) The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II Herkogamy. New Zealand J. Bot. 24: 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M. R. (1996) Pollen-feeding fly alters floral phenotypic gender inCentropogon solanifolius (Campanulaceae). Biotropica 28: 770–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Linera G. (1993) Vegetación de bordes de un bosque nublado en el Parque Ecológico Clavijero, Xalapa, Veracruz, México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 41: 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe L. M. (1997) Differential flower herbivory and gall formation on males and females ofNeea psychotroides, a dioecious tree. Biotropica. 29: 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe L. M., Barrett S. C. H. (1989) Patterns of pollen removal and deposition in tristylousPontederia cordata L. (Pontederiaceae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 36: 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar J. H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolá M. G. (1984) Estudio de la vegetación de los alrededores de Xalapa, Veracruz. Tesis de Licenciatura (Biología). Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Instituto de Ecología, Apartado Postal No. 63, 91000, Xalapa, Veracruz, México

    Paola Sabina Contreras & Juan Francisco Ornelas

Authors
  1. Paola Sabina Contreras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Francisco Ornelas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Contreras, P.S., Ornelas, J.F. Reproductive conflicts ofPalicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae) a distylous shrub of a tropical cloud forest in Mexico. Pl Syst Evol 219, 225–241 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985581

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985581

Key words

Search

Navigation