Skip to main content
Log in

Floral development and systematics ofCistaceae

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The floral development of representatives of six genera ofCistaceae has been studied. Calyx development involves the formation of a ring primordium in several taxa. Androecium development in species with intermediate or higher stamen numbers starts with the formation of a ring meristem on which the stamens are initiated in a centrifugal direction. In many taxa five alternipetalous leading stamen primordia can be observed. In the apetalous (cleistogamous) flowers ofTuberaria inconspicua androecium development appears to be unordered; this is probably due to the lack of petals. InLechea intermedia (also cleistogamous) the corolla is trimerous and three complex stamen primordia are produced, which give rise either to one or three stamens. Relationships withinCistaceae are discussed. Floral development inCistaceae is compared with that in otherMalvanae. Among the eight families ofMalvanae from which information on floral development is availableCochlospermaceae andBixaceae exhibit the greatest similarities toCistaceae. InCistaceae the leading stamen primordia are alternipetalous. InBixa the same condition seems to be present. InMalvales s. str. mostTiliaceae also show earliest stamen initiation in alternipetalous sectors, whereas the stamens of the innermost alternipetalous position are retarded early or even suppressed inSterculiaceae, Bombacaceae, andMalvaceae. WithinMalvales s. str. the diversity of androecial developmental patterns seems to decrease inBombacaceae andMalvaceae due to increasing synorganization in the mature androecium. The derivation of polyandry inMalvanae from diplo- or obdiplostemony is discussed by comparison with the sister clades ofMalvanae as shown in recentrbcL studies (i.e.Sapindales, Rutales, the glucosinolate producing clade, andMyrtales).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alverson, W. S., Karol, K., Conti, E., Sytsma, J., 1994: Circumscription of theMalvales and its placement in rosids based onrbcL sequence data. — Amer. J. Bot.81(6, Suppl.): 139. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillon, H., 1862: Etudes organogéniques sur quelques genres deByttneriacées. — Adansonia2: 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1873: XXIX Chlaenacées. In: Histoire des plantes. —4, pp. 220–226. — Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batenburg, I. H., Moeliono, B. M., 1982: Oligomery and vasculature in the androecium ofMollugo nudicaulis Lam. (Molluginaceae). — Acta Bot. Neerl.31: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, C., Hoppe, J. R., 1990: Die Blütenentwicklung vonTheobroma cacao L. (Sterculiaceae). — Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen65: 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S., Frankie, G. W., 1983:Cochlospermum vitifolium. — InJanzen, D. H., (Ed.): Costa Rican natural history, pp. 215–216. — Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, B. L., 1983:Bixa orellana. — InJanzen, D. H., (Ed.): Costa Rican natural history, pp. 193–194. — Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, J., 1992: Floral biology and pollinators of three co-occurringCistus species (Cistaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.109: 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummit, R. K., 1992: Vascular plant families and genera. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capuron, R., 1970: Observation sur les Sarcolaenacées. — Adansonia, Sér. 2,10: 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco, A., 1952: Chlénacées. — InHumbert, H., (Ed.): Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. 126e famille. — Paris: Firmin, Didot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D., Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Hills, H. G., Qiu, Y.-L., Kron, K. A., Rettig, J. H., Conti, E., Palmer, J. D., Manhart, J. R., Sytsma, K. J., Michaels, H. J., Kress, W. J., Karol, K. G., Clark, W. D., Hedrén, M., Gaut, B. S., Jansen, R. K., Kim, K.-J., Wimpee, C. F., Smith, J. F., Furnier, G. R., Strauss, S. H., Xiang, Q.-Y., Plunkett, G. M., Soltis, P. S., Swensen, S. E., Williams, P. A., Gadek, C. J., Quinn, L. E., Eguiarte, E., Golenberg, G. H., Learn, S., Jr.,Graham, S. W., Barrett, S. C. H., Dayanandan, S., Albert, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, E., Litt, A., Sytsma, K. J., 1996: Circumscription ofMyrtales and their relationships to other rosids: evidence fromrbcL sequence data. — Amer. J. Bot.83: 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domke, W., 1934: Untersuchungen über die systematische und geographische Gliederung der Thymelaeaceen. — Biblioth. Bot.111: 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, A. W., 1878: Blüthendiagramme.II. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlin, H. L., 1935a: A critical revision of certain taxonomic groups of theMalvales. — New Phytol.34: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1935b: A critical revision of certain taxonomic groups of theMalvales. Part II. — New Phytol.34: 122–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1990: Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.39: 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: Evolution and floral diversity: the phylogenetic surroundings ofArabidopsis andAntirrhinum. — Int. J. Pl. Sci.153: S106-S122.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994: Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1996: Homoplasy in angiosperm flowers. — InSanderson, M. J., Hufford, L., (Eds): Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution, pp. 303–325. — San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., van der Pijl, L., 1971: The principles of pollination ecology. — Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, E. S., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J., 1995:Simaroubaceae, an artificial construct: evidence fromrbcL sequence variation. — Amer. J. Bot.82: 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. B., 1992: Pattern formation in shoots: a likely role for minimal energy configurations of the tunica. — Int. J. Pl. Sci.153: S59-S75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, W., 1903:Cistaceae. — InEngler, A., (Ed.): Das Pflanzenreich.IV 193, pp. 1–161. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, H., 1940:Akaniaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn;19bI, pp. 173–175. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, J., 1988: Pollination relationships in Southern Spanish mediterranean shrublands. — J. Ecol.76: 274–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: Flower variation and breeding system in theCistaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.179: 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, Y., Shivanna, K. R., 1977: The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. — Ann. Bot.41: 1233–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirmer, M., 1918: Beiträge zur Morphologie polyandrischer Blüten. — Flora110: 140–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, U., Ludewig, J., 1985: Morphologie und systematische Stellung vonLimnanthes douglasii R. Brown, einem repräsentative Vertreter derLimnanthaceae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.105: 401–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister, W., 1868: Allgemeine Morphologie der Gewächse. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H., 1993:Neurada — eine Gattung derMalvales. — Sendtnera1: 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janchen, E., 1925:Cistaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn,21, pp. 289–313. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, M., 1985: Struktur, Funktion und systematische Bedeutung des Gynoeciums bei Sterculiaceen. — Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zürich. — Zürich: ADAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: Different gynoecium types inSterculiaceae: ontogeny and functional aspects. — InLeins, P., Tucker, S. C., Endress, P. K., (Eds): Aspects of floral development, pp. 225–236. — Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Q. O. N., Daoud, H. S., Stirton, C. H., 1981: Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petals. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.83: 57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Londoño, A. C., Alvarez, E., Forero, E., Morton, C. M., 1995: A new genus and species ofDipterocarpaceae from the Neotropics. I. Introduction, taxonomy, ecology, and distribution. — Brittonia47: 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B., Ashton, P. S., 1977:Pakaraimaeoideae, Dipterocarpaceae of the Western Hemisphere. II. Systematic, geographic and phyletic considerations. — Taxon26: 341–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncur, M. W., 1981: Floral initiation in field crops. — Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, O. I., 1998: Ovule and seed anatomy ofCistaceae and relatedMalvanae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.209: 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Chase, M. W., Endress, P. K., 1998: A combined cladistic analysis of dicot families usingrbcL and non-molecular data sets. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.85 (in press).

  • Payer, J.-B., 1857: Traité d'organogénie comparée de la fleur. — Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pax, F., 1936a:Moringaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2nd edn,17b, pp. 693–698. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1936b:Bretschneideraceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn,17b, pp. 699–700. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilger, R., 1925a:Bixaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn,21, pp. 313–315. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1925b:Cochlospermaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn,21, pp. 316–320. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J., Price, R. A., Karol, K., Conti, E., Sytsma, K. J., Palmer, J. D., 1993: Nucleotide sequences of therbcL gene indicate monophyly of mustard oil plants. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 686–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene, L.-P., 1989: Floral development ofCochlospermum tinctorium andBixa orellana with special emphasis on the androecium. — Amer. J. Bot.76: 1344–1359.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1992: The androecium of theMagnoliophytina: characterisation and systematic importance. — Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leuven.

  • , 1992: Complex polyandry in theMagnoliatae: definition, distribution and systematic value. — Nordic J. Bot.12: 621–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994: Merosity in flowers: definition, origin, and taxonomic significance. — Pl. Syst. Evol.191: 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1995: The floral development ofNeurada procumbens L. (Neuradaceae). — Acta Bot. Neerl.44: 439–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E. R., 1936: The vascular ground-plan as a guide to the floral ground-plan: illustrated fromCistaceae. — New Phytol.35: 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E. R., 1939: Floral morphology. 2. — Cambridge: Heffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, K., 1895a:Tiliaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 1st edn,III/6, pp. 8–30. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1895b:Sterculiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 1st edn,III/6, pp. 69–99. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1895c:Chlaenaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 1st edn,III/6, pp. 168–175. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterk, A. A., 1970: Reduction of the androecium inSpergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae). — Acta Bot. Neerl.19: 488–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. L., 1987: Systema Magnoliophytorum. — Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talavera, S., Gibbs, P. E., Herrera, J., 1993: Reproductive biology ofCistus ladanifer (Cistaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.186: 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W., 1969: Die Infloreszenzen. Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers.2, 1. — Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S. C., 1987: Floral initiation and development in legumes. — InStirton, C. H., (Ed.): Advances in legume systematics.3, pp. 183–239. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1991: Helical floral organogenesis inGleditsia, a primitive caesalpinioid legume. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1130–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukraintseva, V. V., 1993: Pollen morphology of the familyCistaceae in relation to its taxonomy. — Grana (Suppl.2): 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphof, J. C. T., 1938: Cleistogamic flowers. — Bot. Rev.4: 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heel, W. A., 1966: Morphology of the androecium inMalvales. — Blumea13: 182–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1978: Morphology of the pistil inMalvaceae — Ureneae. — Blumea24: 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcourt, B., 1989:Dipterocarpaceae. — InPolhill, R. M., (Ed.): Flora of Tropical East Africa. — Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F., 1981: Morphologie der Blüten und der Blütenstände. — Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. C., 1966: A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woon, C., Keng, H., 1979: Observations on stamens of theDipterocarpaceae. — Gard. Bull. (Singapore)32: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nandi, O.I. Floral development and systematics ofCistaceae . Pl Syst Evol 212, 107–134 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985224

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985224

Key words

Navigation