Skip to main content
Log in

A Multitrait-multimethod examination of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI)

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, certain Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) scales have seen increasing usage for the measurement of DSM-III personality disorders. The current study sought to identify the convergent and discriminant validity of these two sets of scales for this purpose. In general, the results indicated significant convergence across the two instruments. However, better convergent validity was found for scales representing those DSM-III disorders which are most consistent with the typology upon which the MCMI was based. In particular, convergent and discriminant validity results were poorest for Compulsive, Antisocial, and Passive-Aggressive personality scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 584–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubro, A. F. (1987).External validation study of the MMPI personality disorder scales. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, New York, Sept.

  • Golding, S. L., & Seidman, E. (1974). Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices: A two step principal components procedure.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 9, 479–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. L., & Farr, S. P. (1987).Concordance among MMPI and MCMI personality disorder scales. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, Sept.

  • Hays, R. (1986). MTMMBAS: A program for analyzing multitrait-multimethod matrices.Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 5, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1969). Multimethod factor analysis in the evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity.Psychological Bulletin, 72, 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1961). A note on Guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 14, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenigsberg, H. W., Kaplan, R. D., Gilmore, M. M., & Cooper, A. M. (1985). The relationship between syndrome and personality disorder in DSM-III: Experience with 2,462 patients.American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korchin, S. J., Schuldberg, D. (1981). The future of clinical assessment.American Psychologist, 36, 1147–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorr, M., & Cave, R. L. (1966). The equivalence of psychotic syndromes across two media.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1969).Modern psychopathology. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1981).Disorders of personality: DSM-III Axis II. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1982).Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1985). The MCMI provides a good assessment of DSM-III disorders: The MCMI-II will prove even better.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. (1986). The MCMI and DSM-III: Further commentaries.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 205–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1985). A psychometric analysis of five DSM-III categories.Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1986). A comparison of three personality disorder assessment approaches.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 8, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1987).MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorder: Preliminary validation studies. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, New York, Sept.

  • Morey, L. C. (1988). Personality disorders in DSM-III and DSM-III-R: Convergence, coverage, and internal consistency.American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 473–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C., & McNamara, T. P. (1987). On definitions, diagnosis, and DSM-III.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 283–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C., & Smith, M. R. (1988). Personality disorders. In R. L. Greene (Ed.),The MMPI: Use with specific populations. Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C., Waugh, M. H., & Blashfield, R. K. (1985). MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: Their derivation and correlates.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C., Blashfield, R. K., Webb, W. W., & Jewell, J. (1988). MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: A preliminary validation study.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1979).Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, B., Coryell, W., Zimmerman, M., & Stangl, D. (1986). DSM-III personality disorders: Diagnostic overlap and internal consistency of individual DSM-III criteria.Comprehensive Psychiatry, 27, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitraitmultimethod data.Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Frances, A. (1985). The DSM-III personality disorders: Perspectives from psychology.Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Kelso, K. (1983). Psychodiagnosis of Axis II.Clinical Psychology Review, 3, 491–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Sanderson, C. (1987). The convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI as a measure of the DSM-III personality disorders.Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., Williams, J. B., Spitzer, R., & Frances, A. (1985). The MCMI and DSM-III: A brief rejoinder to Millon.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 366–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., Frances, A., Warner, L., & Bluhm, C. (1986). Diagnostic criteria for the Borderline and Schizotypal personality disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., Williams, J. B., Spitzer, R., & Frances, A. (1986). The MCMI and DSM-III: A brief rejoinder to Millon.Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 198–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morey, L.C., Le Vine, D.J. A Multitrait-multimethod examination of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI). J Psychopathol Behav Assess 10, 333–344 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960626

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960626

Key words

Navigation