Skip to main content
Log in

The value of second-look operation in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

  • Originals
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A second-look operation was performed on 151 patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had responded to primary surgery and chemotherapy. 19% of the 79 patients who appeared clinically to be free of disease had microscopic recurrences and 23% had macroscopic residual disease at a second-look operation. The 5-year survival rate for patients with no histological and for those with microscopic secondaries at second-look operation were 55% and 35% respectively (P=0.45). Only patients with well or moderately well differentiated tumors and a small residual tumor mass at first operation had a good prognosis after a second-look operation even without further chemotherapy. Median survival after secondary debulking was 15 to 17 months and was independent in the radicality of the second-look procedure. Outside of clinical trials second-look laparotomy should therefore only be performed as a diagnostic procedured as a diagnostic procedure in patients with well or moderately well differentiated tumors who are left with a small residual tumor mass at the time of the first operation. Because this is a group of patients in whom chemotherapy can be discontinued after a negative second-look operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (1981) Evaluation of the cancer patient and the response to treatment. In: Monfardini S, Brunner K, Crowther D, Olive D, MacDonald J, Eckhardt S, Whitehouse J (eds) Manual of cancer chemotherapy. UICC, Geneva, pp 17-26

  2. Berek JS, Hacker NF, Lagasse LD, Nieberg RK, Elashoff RM (1983) Survival of patients following secondary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 61:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DE, Shaff MI, Jones HW Grosh WW, Greco FA, Burnett LS (1985) Abdominopelvic computed tomography: evaluation in patients undergoing second-look laparotomy for ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 65:715–719

    Google Scholar 

  4. Copeland LJ, Gershenson DM (1986) Ovarian cancer recurrences in patients with no macroscopic tumor at second-look laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 68:873–874

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J R. Stat Soc B 34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dauplat J, Ferriere JP, Gorbinet M Legros M, Chollet P, Giraud B, Plagne R (1986) Second-look laparotomy in managing epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 57:1627–1631

    Google Scholar 

  7. Day TG, Gallager HS, Rutledge FN (1975) Epithelial carcinoma of the ovary: the prognostic importance of histologic grade. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 42:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neijt JP, Ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Van der Burg MEL, Van Oosterom AT (1986) Complete remission at laparotomy: still a gold standard in ovarian cancer? Lancet II:1028

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niloff JM, Bast RC, Schaetzl EM, Knapp RC (1985) Predictive value of CA 125 antigen levels in second-look procedures for ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:981–986

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pateisky N, Philipp K, Sevelda P, Skodler WD, Enzelsberger H, Hamilton G, Burchell J, Schatten Ch (1987) Radioimmunoscintigraphy using monoclonal antibodies before second-look sugery in patients suffering from ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 24:212–216

    Google Scholar 

  13. Podratz KC, Malkasian GD, Hilton JF, Harris EA, Gaffey TA (1985) Second-look laparotomy in ovarian cancer: evaluation of pathologic variables. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:230–238

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raju KS, McKinna JA, Barker GH, Wiltshaw E, Jones JM (1982) Second-look operations in the planned management of advanced ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:650–654

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salzer H, Gitsch E, Ditrich Ch, Sevelda P, Karrer K, Schemper M, Stempel-Smekal G, Langer M Wagner G, Rainer H, Moser K, Czerwenka K, Breitenecker G, Spona J, Austrian Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Study Group (1985) Results of the first multicenter austrian ovarian cancer study: prospective randomized comparison of a sequential chemotherapy (Adriamycin/Cisplatinum-Vincristine/Cyclophosphamide-Methotrexate) with two standard treatments (Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide or Adriamycin/Cisplatinum) in patients with stage III and IV carcinoma. Geburtsh. Frauenheilkd 45:761–768

    Google Scholar 

  16. Serov SF, Scully RE, Sarbin LH (1973) Histological typing of ovarian tumors. In: International histological classification of tumors. WHO, Geneva, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sevelda P, Salzer H, Ditrich Ch, Pateisky N, Spona J (1987) The diagnostic validity of the tumor marker CA 125 in ovarian cancer patients. Tumor Diagn Ther 8:115–120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sevelda, P., Dittrich, C. & Salzer, H. The value of second-look operation in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 244, 79–86 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931377

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931377

Key words

Navigation