Skip to main content
Log in

Application of multivariate analyses in studies of the organization and structure of fish and invertebrate communities

  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological studies often attempt to link observed effects to multiple causal factors which may be operating simultaneously. Although in situ randomized experiments in which factor levels are controlled may be a powerful means for disentangling causal relationships, an experimental approach is not always feasible or even a desirable first step in the analysis, particularly when there is insufficient background knowledge of the system. In such cases, analysis of survey data, reflecting natural (co)variation in the putative causal factors and their direct and indirect effects, can be a practical and useful alternative to experiments. When set in the proper statistical framework, survey data can be used to assess whether a given factor has a detectable effect once the effect of other factors has been accounted for statistically (by partialling), and to estimate what proportion of the effect can be attributed to each factor (by variance decomposition). This analysis can help establish whether a particular causal model is consistent with the data at hand, and should be viewed as preliminary to a mechanistic approach, providing support and guidance for the investigation of more realistic variables. Here, we use three examples based on survey data from fish and invertebrate lacustrine communities to illustrate the application of partialling and variance decomposition in a multivariate setting. The first example shows that variation in the abundance and size structure of cladoceran taxa is still associated with fish species composition when potentially confounding effects of abiotic variables are accounted for by partialling. In the second and third examples, variance decomposition is used to determine the relative contribution of the environmental and spatial components to variation in the community structure of littoral zoobenthos and in the diet of a freshwater fish species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borcard, D., P. Legendre and P. Drapeau, 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. L. and S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., 1979. Causality and modern science (3rd revised ed.). Dover Pubications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and P. Cohen, 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H., 1975. Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. In: M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamonds (eds.), Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 460–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M., 1986. Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiments, and natural experiments. In: J. M. Diamond and T. J. Case (eds.), Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, NY, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, L. M., 1987. Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behavior. Can. J. Zool 65:803–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, S. I., 1970. Complementary feeding niches sustained by size-selective predation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15:131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. and H. Smith, 1981. Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New York, NY. 709 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunson, W. A. and J. Travis, 1991. The role of abiotic factors in community organization. Am. Nat. 138:1067–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R. and S. C. Stearns, 1982. On inference in ecology and evolutionary ecology: the problem of multiple causes. Acta Biotheoretica 31:145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinch, S. G., K. N. Somers and N. C. Collins, 1994. Spatial autocorrelation and assessment of habitat-abundance relationships in littoral zone fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51:701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. G. and J. S. Farris, 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., 1990. Quantitative methods and biogeographic analysis. In: D. J. Garbary and G. R. South (eds.), Evolutionary biogeography of the marine algae of the North Atlantic, NATO ASI Series, Vol. 22. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. and M. Troussellier, 1988. Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria: modeling in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33:1055–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnan, P., 1988. Interactions between brook charr,Salvelinus fontinalis, and nonsalmonid species: ecological shift, morphological shift, and their impact on zooplankton communities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:999–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnan, P. and E. D. Stevens, 1993. Pyloric caecal morphology of brook charr,Salvelinus fontinalis, in relation to diet. Env. Biol. Fish. 36:205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnan, P., M. A. Rodríguez, P. Legendre and S. Lacasse, 1994. Dietary variation in a freshwater fish species: relative contributions of biotic interactions, abiotic factors, and spatial structure. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51:2856–2865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. A., 1992. Community regulation: under what conditions are bottom-up factors important on rocky shores? Ecology 73:755–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. A. and A. M. Olson, 1990. Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community structure. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nero, R. W. and W. G. Sprules, 1986. Zooplankton species abundance and biomass in relation to occurrence ofMysis relicta (Malacostraca: Mysidacea). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43:420–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. A. and B. Pejler, 1973. On the relation between fish fauna and zooplankton composition in north Swedish lakes. Rep. Inst. Freshwater Res., Drottningholm 53:51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, W.J., 1975. Some aspects of the limnology of the ponds and lakes of the Noatak drainage basin, Alaska. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 19:472–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, L. and S. Diehl, 1990. Mechanistic individual-based approaches in the population/community ecology of fishes. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 27:165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis, G. A., 1994. Food webs, trophic cascades and community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 19:121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, G. F. and J. C. H. Carter, 1975. Crustacean plankton communities of the Matamek River system and their variation with predation. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32:2530–2535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, M. A. and P. Magnan, 1993. Community structure of lacustrine macrobenthos: do taxonbased and size-based approaches yield similar insights? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:800–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, M. A., P. Magnan and S. Lacasse, 1993. Fish species composition and lake abiotic variables in relation to the abundance and size structure of cladoceran zooplankton. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:638–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, P. F., 1979. Habitat partitioning and competition in fish communities. In: R. H. Stroud and H. Clepper (eds.), Predator-prey systems in fisheries management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W., 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122:240–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W., 1986. Mechanistic approaches to community ecology: a new reductionism? Amer. Zool. 26:81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenson, J. A. E., 1973. On predation andHolopedium gibberum (Zaddach) distribution. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18:1005–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis in ecology. Ecology 67:1167–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987. Ordination. In: Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. ter Braak, O. F. R. van Tongeren (eds.), Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. PUDOC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 91–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1988a. CANOCO — a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C.J.F., 1988b. Partial canonical correspondence analysis. In: Bock, H. H. (ed.), Classification methods and related methods of data analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 551–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C.J.F., 1990. Interpreting canonical correlation analysis through biplots of structure correlations and weights. Psychometrika 55:519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C.J.F., 1991. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C.J.F. and I. C. Prentice, 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18:271–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J., 1986. The analysis of competition by field experiments. In: J. Kikkawa and D. J. Anderson (eds.), Community ecology: pattern and process. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, California, pp. 240–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J. and P. S. Petraitis, 1993. Structure of intertidal assemblages in different locations: how can local processes be compared? In: R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter (eds.), Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E., 1986. Species interactions in freshwater fish communities. In: J. M. Diamond and T. J. Case (eds.), Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, NY, pp. 344–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, H. M. and J. Travis, 1984. An experimental approach to understanding natural communities. In: D. R. Strong, Jr., D. Simberloff, L. G. Abele and A. B. Thistle (eds.), Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., 1988. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc. Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution of the Group for Interuniversitary Research in Limnology (G.R.I.L.).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez, M.A., Magnan, P. Application of multivariate analyses in studies of the organization and structure of fish and invertebrate communities. Aquatic Science 57, 199–216 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877427

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877427

Key words

Navigation