Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic context and figure-ground organization

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The semantic-priming paradigm was used to investigate the effect of semantic context on the latency to identify visually ambiguous and unambiguous targets. Ambiguous targets had reversible figure-ground organizations analogous to Rubin's vase-profiles picture in which the figural vase is shaped by the same contour that, if reassigned, shapes two figural profiles. The two organizations of the ambiguous targets were either a series of black irregular shapes or a familiar word in white letters; subjects were required to achieve the latter organization. Unambiguous target words were not reversible. Related primes, unlike unrelated primes, facilitated the identification of both types of target; but the magnitude of facilitation was greater for ambiguous targets. The results demonstrate that semantic context influences the speed of figure-ground organization and add perceptual ambiguity to the target manipulations that interact with context to affect encoding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B. (1981). Cognitive factors in subjective stabilization of the visual world.Acta Psychologica, 48, 111–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klymenko, V., & Weisstein, N. (1986). Spatial frequency differences can determine figure-ground organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human. Perception and Performance, 12, 324–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klymenko, V., Weisstein, N., Topolski, R., & Hsieh, C. (1989). Spatial and temporal frequency in figure-ground organization.Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol. V). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, L. A. (1985). The effect of masked pictures on the interpretation of ambiguous pictures.Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 4, 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, D. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964).Word association norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, J. R., & Kubovy, M. (1986). Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. II).Cognitive processes and performance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1986). The description and analysis of object and event perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. II).Cognitive processes and performance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, E. (1921/1958). Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Translated by D. C. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.),Readings in psychology. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. W., & McDonald, J. E. (1981). Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 673–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Meyer, D. E. (1973). Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and Performance (Vol. IV). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. E. Koster (Ed.),Attention and Performance (Vol II). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W. R. (1981).A taxonomy of visual processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, B. (1963). A threshold difference produced by a figureground dichotomy.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 201–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E., & Weisstein, N. (1982). Anew perceptual context-superiority effect: Line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground.Science, 218, 587–589.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E., & Weisstein, N. (1983). Sharp targets are detected better against a figure, and blurred targets are detected better against a background.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E., & Weisstein, N. (1987). The effects of flicker on the perception of figure and ground.Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 440–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zusne, L. (1970).Visual perception of form. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, J., Schiffman, H.R. & Greist-Bousquet, S. Semantic context and figure-ground organization. Psychol. Res 52, 306–309 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868062

Keywords

Navigation