Skip to main content
Log in

Conclusion

The above techniques can help establish more accurately the state of knowledge applicable to improving services. These techniques can be expected to be used more as the United States struggles to make its health and mental health care systems more efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. (1990). Medical treatment effectiveness research.AHCPR Program Note. Rockville, MD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J.A., & Lipsey, M.W. (1991). A practitioner's guide to meta-analysis.American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 291–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M.W. (1988). Practice and malpractice in evaluation research.Evaluation Practice, 9(4), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta-analysis.American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health. (1991). Treatment of panic disorder. (1991). NIH Consensus Development Conference Consensus Statement,9(2). Bethesda, MD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991).Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F.L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology.American Psychologist, 47, 1173–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L., & Glass, G.V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.American Psychologist, 32, 752–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (1992).Cross design synthesis: A new strategy for medical effectiveness research (GAO/PEMD-92-18). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J.P., Sullivan, S.E., & Malinak, J. (1989). The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The views expressed are his, and do not necessarily represent those of NIMH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Windle, C. The shift to research synthesis. Adm Policy Ment Health 21, 263–267 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00707492

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00707492

Keywords

Navigation