Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable development, the Hartwick rule and optimal growth

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defining sustainable development as non-declining utility, the consistency of this concept with the Hartwick rule and optimal growth is explored when resources are exhaustible. A simple proof that a generalized Hartwick rule is necessary and sufficient for constant consumption is derived. The existence of a maximal constant consumption path is shown to depend critically on the elasticity of substitution; if this is less than 1, consumption declines; if it is greater than 1 then consumption is not maximal; if it is equal to 1 (the Cobb-Douglas case) then existence is proved. Consumption can increase along an optimal path if the pure rate of time preference is 0; if it is non-zero then consumption declines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dasgupta, P. and G. Heal (1979),Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge.

  • Dasgupta, S. and T. Mitra (1983), ‘Intergenerational Equity and Efficient Allocation of Exhaustible Resources’,International Economic Review 24(1), 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., P. Hammond and M. Hoel (1980), ‘On Hartwick's Rule for Regular Maximin Paths of Capital Accumulation and Resource Depletion’,Review of Economic Studies XLVII, 551–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J. M. (1977), ‘Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources’,American Economic Review 67(5), 972–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J. M. (1978), ‘Substitution Among Exhaustible Resources and Intergenerational Equity’,Review of Economic Studies XLV(2)(140), 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J. M. (1990), ‘Natural Resources, National Accounting and Economic Depreciation’,Journal of Public Economics 43, 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G. (1991), ‘National Accounts and Environmental Resources’,Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1992a), ‘Is Growth Sustainable? Reflections on the Concept of Sustainable Economic Growth’, International Economic Association (mimeo).

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1992b), ‘An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases’,Science 258.

  • Pearce, D. W., A. Markandya and E. Barbier (1989),Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey, J. (1989), ‘Economic Analysis of Sustainable Growth and Sustainable Development’, Environment Dept. Working Paper No. 15, The World Bank.

  • Ramsey, F. (1928), ‘A Mathematical Survey of Saving’,Economic Journal 38, 543–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1974), ‘Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources’,Review of Economic Studies Symposium.

  • Solow, R. M. (1986), ‘On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources’,Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88(1), 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton, K. Sustainable development, the Hartwick rule and optimal growth. Environ Resource Econ 5, 393–411 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691576

Key words

Navigation