Conclusion
Let me come back to the successes of the Poincaré group in particle physics. This is a group with ten generators. The translation generators are responsible for the energy-momentum conservation laws, the rotation generators of the conservation of angular momentum, and the boost generators of the conservation ofinitial position. If positions are slightly different from the ones described by Minkowski space, it means that we have to change slightly the notion of boosts. If we remember that boosts were questionable in Minkowski space (see Section 9), we are not surprised. We are naturally led to a deformation of the Poincaré group which would preserve translations and rotations [such a deformation has been proposed by Lukierskiet al. (n.d.)]. By duality, small changes at short distances must correspond to small changes in large momenta. The fact that cutoffs for momenta are involved in QED is perhaps related to a noncommutative structure for our space. With such a structure, making the size of an electron go to zero is meaningless and consequently the difficulty of an electron with infinite energy also becomes meaningless. A noncommutative space is probably a way to solve the difficulties mentioned in the epigraphs to this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacry, H. (1981).Journal of Physics A,14, L73.
Bacry, H. (1988a).Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré,49, 245.
Bacry, H. (1988b).Localizability and Space in Quantum Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Bacry, H. (1989).Nuclear Physics B (Proceedings Supplement),6, 222.
Bacry, H. (1991). inLecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 382,Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Bacry, H. (1991).Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré,56, 345.
Connes, A. (1986).Publications Mathematiques IHES,62, 257.
Connes, A. (1990).Géométrie non commutative, InterEditions.
Duval, C., Elhadad, J., and Tuynman, G. M. (1990). Pukanszky's condition and symplectic induction, preprint CPT-90/P.2398, Centre de physique théorique, Marseille, France.
Dyson, F. (1972).Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society,78, 635.
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M. (1965).The Feynman Lectures in Physics, Vol. 3, Chapter 1, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
Grigore, D. R. (1989).Journal of Mathematical Physics,30, 2646.
Holton, G. (1973).Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Lukierski, J., Nowicki, A., and Ruegg, H. (n.d.) New quantum Poincaré algebra and κ-deformed field theory,Physics Letters B, in press.
Newton, T. D., and Wigner, E. P. (1949).Review of Modern Physics,21, 400.
Poincaré, H. (1892).Théorie mathématique de la lumière, Georges Carré, Paris.
Schrödinger, E. (1984).Collected Papers, Vol. 3, Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna.
Wigner, E. P. (1939).Annals of Mathematics,40, 149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bacry, H. Reflections on the evolution of physical theories. Int J Theor Phys 32, 1281–1292 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00675195
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00675195