Skip to main content
Log in

Propositional systems in local field theories

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate prepositional systems for local field theories, which reflect intrinsically the uncertainties of measurements made on the physical system, and satisfy the isotony and local commutativity postulates of Haag and Kastler. The space-time covariance can be implemented in a natural way in these propositional systems. New techniques are introduced to obtain these propositional systems: the lattice-valued logics. The decomposition of the complete orthomodular lattice-valued logics shows that these logics are more general than the usual two-valued ones and that in these logics there is enough structure to characterize the classical and quantum, nonrelativistic and relativistic local field theories in a natural way. The Hubert modules give the natural inner product “spaces” (modules) for the realization of the lattice-valued logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banai, M. (1978). preprint, KFKI-1978-20.

  • Banai, M. (1980a). “A New Algebraic Approach to Nonrelativistic Quantum Theory,” submitted toJ. Math. Phys.

  • Banai, M. (1980b). “Propositional Systems in Field Theories and Lattice Valued Quantum Logics,” inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti ed. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banai, M. (1980c). Thesis, University Loránd Eötvös, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G., and von Neumann, J. (1936). “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Annals of Mathematics,37, 823–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emch, G. G. (1972).Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudder, S. (1970). “Axiomatic Quantum Mechanics and Generalized Probability Theory,” inProbabilistic Methods in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 2, A. T. Bharucha-Reid ed. Academic Press, New York, pp. 53–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag, R., and Kastler, D. (1964). “An Algebraic Approach to Quantum Field Theory,”Journal of Mathematical Physics,5(7), 848–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, J. (1968).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jech, Th. (1971).Lectures in Set Theory with Particular Emphasis on the Method of Forcing, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplansky, I. (1953). “Modules over Operator Algebras,”American Journal of Mathematics,75, 839–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, G. (1963).The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piron, C. (1976).Foundation of Quantum Physics. Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuti, G., and Zaring, W. M. (1973).Axiomatic Set Theory. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuti, G. (1980). “Quantum Set Theory,” inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti ed. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is also with the Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1363, Budapest, P.O.B. 24.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banai, M. Propositional systems in local field theories. Int J Theor Phys 20, 147–169 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00669793

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00669793

Keywords

Navigation