Skip to main content
Log in

The solvation of the dioxouranium(VI) ion by dimethyl sulfoxide

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The species UO2(DMSO) 2+5 is shown from1H NMR studies to be the predominant dioxouranium(VI) species existing in dilute anhydrous acetonedimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solutions, and this result is compared with data reported for the analogous water-acetone-dimethyl sulfoxide system. Complete line-shape analyses of exchange-modified1H NMR line shapes indicate that the mechanism for DMSO exchange on UO2(DMSO) 2+5 is probably of theD orI D type. A typical set of rate parameters arek ex (260°K) =273±14 sec−1, ΔH #=38.9±0.5 kJ-mole−1, and ΔS #=−47.5±1.8 J-oK−1-mole−1 for a solution in which [UO2(DMSO)5 2+], [DMSO], and [d 6 acetone] are, respectively, 0.01155, 0.0875, and 13.00 moles-dm−3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. P. Bowen, S. F. Lincoln, and E. H. Williams,J. Magn. Reson. 19, 243 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. P. Bowen, S. F. Lincoln, and E. H. Williams,Inorg Chem. 15, 2126 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Crea, S. F. Lincoln, and E. H. Williams,Aust. J. Chem. 29, 2183 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Crea, R. Diguisto, S. F. Lincoln, and E. H. Williams,Inorg. Chem. 16, 2825 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Fratiello, G. A. Vidulich, C. Cheng, and V. Kubo,J. Solution Chem. 1, 433 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Fratiello, V. Kubo, and R. E. Schuster,Inorg. Chem. 10, 744 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. W. Alcock and S. Esperàs,J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 893 (1977).

  8. N. M. Karayannis, C. Owens, L. L. Pytelwski, and M. M. Labes,J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 31, 2059 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen and W. L. Groenveld,Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 3, 145. (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. D. Burrows and T. J. Kemp,Chem. Soc. Rev. 3, 139 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. I. Vogel,Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, 3rd ed. (Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1961), p. 702.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. F. Lincoln,Coord. Chem. Rev. 6, 309 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Fratiello,Prog. Inorg. Chem. 17, 57 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Toma, M. Villemin, and J. M. Thiery,J. Phys. Chem. 77, 1294 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Crea, S. F. Lincoln, and R. J. West,Aust. J. Chem. 26, 1227 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. U. Mayer and V. Gutmann,Struct. Bonding,12, 113 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. R. Nassimbeni and A. L. Rodgers,Cryst. Struct. Commun. 5, 301 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. H. Langford and H. B. Gray, inLigand Substitution Processes, (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. M. Fuoss,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 5059 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Kustin and J. Swinehart,Prog. Inorg. Chem. 13, 107 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Honan, G.J., Lincoln, S.F. & Williams, E.H. The solvation of the dioxouranium(VI) ion by dimethyl sulfoxide. J Solution Chem 7, 443–451 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646114

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646114

Key words

Navigation