Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological differences among clones of Daphnia pulex Leydig

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Natural populations of Daphnia pulex that reproduce by obligate parthenogenesis include a number of clones. Studies on two common and two rare clones from southwestern Ontario revealed significant differences in their intrinsic rates of increase, competitive abilities, rates of ephippial egg production, and lifespans. Environmental factors such as temperature and food type had large inluences on the rate of increase of each clone. Differences in rates of increase among clones were most pronounced at temperatures higher than those encountered in nature. In general, the covariance of life history traits among clones was high. The outcome of competitive encounters between clones was deterministic and in most cases was unaffected by temperature. Clones with high rates of increase tended to be better competitors than those with low rates of increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (1973) Competition and the relative abundance of two cladocerans. Ecology 54:484–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold DE (1971) Ingestion, assimilation, survival and reproduction by Daphnia pulex fed seven species of blue-green algae. Limnol Oceanogr 16:906–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1974) Competition and the structure of bird communities. Princeton University Press Princeton New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw JW (1966) Productivity and competitive ability in Tribolium. Am Nat 100:683–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson PS, Lerner IM (1962) Genetic variation and indeterminism in interspecific competition. Am Nat 96:379–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities In: ML Cody, JM Diamond (ed), Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press Cambridge pp 342–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank PW (1952) A laboratory study of intraspecies and interspecies competition in Daphnia pulicaria (Forbes) and Simocephalus vetulus OF Müller. Physiol Zool 30:287–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank PW (1957) Coactions in laboratory populations of two species of Daphnia. Ecology 38:510–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer BD (1972) Population dynamics and recognition of biotypes in the pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can Ent 104:1729–1733

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill DE (1972) Rates of increase and competitive ability. Am Nat 106:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden CE, Comotto RM, Hendrickson Jr. JA, Hornig LL, Johnson KL (1980) Procedures and recommendations for the culture and use of Daphnia in bioassay studies. Report to US Environmental Protection Agency

  • Green J (1954) Size and reproduction in Daphnia magna. Proc Zool Soc Lond 124:535–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG, Kellerman SL (1965) Competition between varieties 2 and 3 of Paramecium aurelia. The influence of temperature in a food limited system. Ecology 46:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN (1978) The population biology of Daphnia (Crustacea, Daphniidae). Biol Rev 53:387–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Crease TJ (1980) Another planktonic paradox: coexisting clones of Daphnia pulex Leydig. Science 207:1363–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1951) Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Infante A (1973) Untersuchungen über die Ausnutzbarkeit verschiedener Algen durch das Zooplankton. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 42:340–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1977a) Coexistence of similar zooplankton species by differential adaptation to reproduction and escape in an environment with fluctuating food and enemy densities. I. A model. Oecologia (Berl) 29:233–247 (1977b) II. Field data analysis of Daphnia. Oecologia (Berl) 30:313–329 (1978) III. Laboratory experiments. Oecologia (Berl) 35:35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot WC (1977) Competition in cladoceran communities: the cost of evolving defenses against copepod predation. Ecology 58:303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • King CE (1972) Adaptation of rotifers to seasonal variation. Ecology 53:408–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane PA (1975) The dynamics of aquatic systems: a comparative study of the structure of four zooplankton communities. Ecol Monogr 45:307–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill LS (1978) r and K selection in experimental populations of E. coli. Science 202:1201–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper and Row New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarewicz JC, Likens GE (1975) Niche analysis of a zooplankton community. Science 190:1000–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Miracle MR (1974) Niche structure in freshwater zooplankton: A principal components approach. Ecology 54:1306–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill WE (1975) Experimental studies of microcrustacean competition, community composition and efficiency of resource utilization. Ecology 56:809–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilssen JP (1976) Community analysis and altitudinal distribution of limnetic Entomostraca from different areas in southern Norway. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 23:105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Park T (1962) Beetles, competition and populations. Science 138:1369–1375

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson ME (1980) The climate of the Essex region Canada's southland. Report #2. Geography Department University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz A (1980) The coexistence of three species of Daphnia in the Klostersee. I. Field studies on the dynamics of reproduction. Oecologia (Berl) 45:117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz A (1979) On the calculation of birth rates and death rates in fluctuating populations with continuous recruitment. Oecologia (Berl) 41:343–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW (1977) Clonal selection: competition among clones. Arch Hydrobiol Beih 8:202–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW (1979) Intraspecific competition and population structure in rotifers. Ecology 60:494–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press Princeton New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM (1972) Predators, invisible prey and the nature of polymorphism in the Cladocera (Class Crustacea) Limnol Oceanogr 17:171–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loaring, J.M., Hebert, P.D.N. Ecological differences among clones of Daphnia pulex Leydig. Oecologia 51, 162–168 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540595

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540595

Keywords

Navigation