Skip to main content
Log in

Autonomy in the doctor-patient relation

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an introduction to this issue, I argue that the concept of autonomy is clearly important for many of the freedoms we enjoy. The problem in medicine with its use lies in interpreting the concept with respect to the impact of disease on persons, the models of medicine we employ, and the settings in which the problems arise. A short statement about the major points of the authors collected in this issue concludes the editorial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veatch, R.: 1982, A Theory of Medical Ethics, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pellegrino, E. and Thomasma, D.: 1981, A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramsey, P.: 1980, Ethics at the Edges of Life, Yale University Press, New Haven, p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Veatch, R.: 1976, Death, Dying and the Biological Revolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergsma, J. and Thomasma, D.: 1982, Health Care: Its Psychosocial Dimensions, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cassell, E.: ‘Disease as an “it”’, Social Science and Medicine.

  7. Dworkin, G.: 1976, ‘Autonomy and behavior control’, Hastings Center Report 6, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wolff, R.: 1970, In Defense of Anarchism, Harper and Row, New York, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kant, I.: 1961, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Hutchinson University Library, London, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zaner, R.: 1981, The Context of Self, Ohio University Press, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacIntyre, A.: 1982, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Annas, G.: 1974, ‘The hospital: A Human rights wasteland’, The Civil Liberties Review 1, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, B.: ‘Whose Life Is It Anyway?’, A 1981 motion picture starring Richard Dreyfuss.

  14. Veatch, R.: 1979, ‘Professional medical ethics: The grounding of its principles’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley, P.: 1980, ‘A response to the March 1979 issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cassell, E.: 1981, ‘The function of medicine’, Hastings Center Report 7, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siegler, M.: 1977, ‘Critical illness: The limits of autonomy’, Hastings Center Report 7, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, B.: 1981, ‘Autonomy and the refusal of lifesaving treatment’, Hastings Center Report 11, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr.: 1978, ‘Commentary: Moral autonomy and the polis: Response to Gerald Dworkin and Gregory Vlastos’, in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. and D. Callahan (eds.) Morals, Science and Sociality, The Hastings Center, Hastings-on-Hudson, pp. 202–214.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomasma, D.: 1983, ‘The limitations of the autonomy model for the doctor-patient relation’, The Pharos.

  21. Thomasma, D.: 1983, ‘Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: A model of physician's conscience for the doctor-patient relationship’, Annals of Internal Medicine.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomasma, D.C. Autonomy in the doctor-patient relation. Theor Med Bioeth 5, 1–7 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489241

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489241

Key words

Navigation