Summary
We examined the prognostic validity of Winokur's familial subtypes of depression in 184 in-patients with primary unipolar major depression. Patients with familial pure depressive disease had a more favorable hospital course and reported less symptoms during a 6-month follow-up evaluation than patients with depressive spectrum disease or sporadic depressive disease. Consistent with previous studies of the validity of the familial subtypes, the use of stringent thresholds to diagnose the patient's relatives increased the validity of classification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreasen NC, Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Winokur G (1977) The family history method using diagnostic criteria. Arch Gen Psychiatry 34:1229–1235
Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G (1979) Cognitive therapy for depression. Guilford Press, New York
Coryell W, Zimmerman M, Pfohl B (1985) Short-term prognosis in primary and secondary major depression. J Affect Dis 9:265–270
Endicott J, Spitzer RJ, Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1976) The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33:766–771
Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff RA, Winokur G, Munoz R (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26:57–63
Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Social Clin Psychology 6:278–296
Katz MM, Secunda R, Hirschfeld RM, Koslow S (1979) NIMH clinical research collaborative branch program on the psychobiology of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 36:765–771
Keller MB, Lavori PW, Friedman B, Nielsen E, Endicott J, McDonald-Scott P, Andreasen NC (1987) The longitudinal interval follow-up evaluation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:540–548
VanValkenburg C, Lowry M, Winokur G, Cadoret R (1977) Depression spectrum disease versus pure depressive disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 165:341–347
Winokur G (1979) Unipolar depression: Is it divisible into autonomous subtypes? Arch Gen Psychiatry 36:47–52
Winokur G (1983) The validity of familial subtypes of depression. McLean Hospital Journal 8:17–37
Winokur G, Behar D, VanValkenburg C, Lowry M (1978) Is a familial definition of depression both feasible and valid? J Nerv Ment Dis 166:764–768
Zimmerman M, Coryell W (1986) Reliability of follow-up assessments of depressed inpatients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:468–470
Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Pfohl BM (1985a) The importance of diagnostic thresholds in familial classification: The dexamethasone suppression test and familial subtypes of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:300–304
Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Pfohl BM (1985b) The treatment validity of DSM-111 melancholic subtyping. Psychiatry Res 16:37–43
Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Pfohl B (1986a) Validity of familial subtypes of primary unipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:1090–1096
Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Pfohl B, Corenthal C, Stangl D (1986b) ECT response in depressed patients with and without a DSM-III personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 143:1030–1032
Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Pfohl B (1987a) Prognostic validity of the dexamethasone suppression test: results of a six-month prospective follow-up. Am J Psychiatry 144:212–214
Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Stangl D, Pfohl B (1987b) Validity of an operational definition for neurotic unipolar major depression. J Affect Dis 12:29–40
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmerman, M., Coryell, W., Pfohl, B. et al. Prognostic validity of the familial subtypes of depression. Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci 237, 166–170 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451285
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451285