Skip to main content
Log in

Pompholyx (Epidermophytosis, Dermatophytosis, Ringworm of the feet, infectious eczematoid dermatitis or ringworm, dyshidrosis)

A statistical contribution to the solution of the pending problems

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

„Pompholyx” as the oldest term for this disease in medical terminology, connoting a recurrent vesicular eruption on palms and soles, is recommended for general use in replacing a number of prejudicial terms connecting this condition either with a hypothetical and long reputed dysfunction of the sweat glands: dyshidrosis or with the causative role of fungi: epidermophytosis.

Publications of statistical investigations pertaining to the subject are reviewed. They show the amazing low percentage of pathogenic fungi which could be recovered in this condition.

Among clinically active cases, the lesions were microscopically negative in the ratio of 10% to 37%.

Clinically active and microscopically fungus-positive cases yielded from 80% to 95 % negative cultural results.

The present study of 983 cases showed 1.9% clinically active lesions on the feet. Microscopically and culturally all these cases were negative for any kind of pathogenic fungi.

During the camping period in mid-summer 1940, from June to late August, no prophylactic measures were taken to kill the fungi or to prevent their dissemination in locker rooms, on runways or shower rooms.

Despite this attitude there was no spread of fungi, no dissemination of infecting agents and no outburst of an epidemic of „epidermophytosis”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Andrews G. C. and Birkman F. W., New York State J. Med., 31, 1029–1031, (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker S. W. and Ritchie E. B., Arch. Dermat. a. Syphil., 22, 790, (1930).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Dermat. Wochschr., 89, 1355–1357, (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Dermat. Ztschr., 60, 58–66, (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Dermat. Wchschr., 90, 633–641, (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Dermat. Wchschr., 90, 166–177, (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., J. Trop. Med., 42, 81–86, (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Mycopathologia, 1, 26–40, (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Ztschr. f. Geburtsh. u. Gynäk., 104, 119–140, (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Acta dermat.-venereol., 12, 38–80, (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., Acta dermat.-venereol., 13, 150–200, (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T., IX Congr. Internat. Dermatolog., Budapest, 1935, 2, 986–987, (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhns und Alexander, Allgemeine Mykologie in Jadassohn's Handbuch d. Haut- u. Geschlechtskr., XI, I, Springer, Berlin, (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler C. S., Houghton J. E. and Cooper G. F., U. S. Nav. Med. Bull., 21, 615–630, (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer G., Arch. f. Dermat. u. Syphil., 169, 244–258, (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox T., Amer. J. Dermat., 4, 1–8, (1873).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser P. K., J. Trop. Med., 42, 141–145, (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman R. L., Pennsylvania Med. J., April (1933).

  • Graffenried v., Dermat. Wchschr., 66, 21, (1918).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griff, Fanny and Itkin, Acta Dermat.-venereol., 11, 508, (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins J. G., Pennsylvania Med. J., March, (1938).

  • Hulsey S. H. and Jordan F. M., Am. J. Med. Sci., 169, 267, (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadisch E., Dermat. Wchschr., 89, 1423–1433, (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann-Wolff M., Dermat. Ztschr., 21, (1914).

  • Legge R. T., Bonar Lee and Templeton H. J., J. Amer. Med. Ass., 92, 1507, (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge R. T., Bonar Lee and Templeton, J. Amer. Med. Ass., 93, 17, (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKee G. M. and Lewis G. M., Arch. Dermat. a. Syphil., 23, 445, (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson A. R., Arch. Dermat., 3, 289–303, July 1877, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickler A. and Friedman R., Arch. Dermat. a. Syphil., 24, 430–445, (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidman F. D., Arch. Dermat. a. Syphil., 15, 415–450, (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White C. J., Arch. Dermat. a. Syphil., 20, 315–319, (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams C. M., Arch. Dermat. a. Syphil., 15, 541, (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J. W., Urol. a. Cutan. Rev., 41, (2), (1937).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benedek, T. Pompholyx (Epidermophytosis, Dermatophytosis, Ringworm of the feet, infectious eczematoid dermatitis or ringworm, dyshidrosis). Mycopathologia 3, 240–254 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00446029

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00446029

Keywords

Navigation